Optimal IPFC damping controller design based on simplex method and self-tuned fuzzy damping scheme in a two-area multimachine power system

This paper develops a novel self-tuned fuzzy damping control scheme for an interline power flow controller (IPFC) to suppress the interarea mode of oscillations in a multimachine power system. The nonlinear adaptive damping controller is based on coordinated operation of two fuzzy inference systems. The first one produces the required $q$-axis voltage reference of the quasi multipulse series converter in response to generator angle oscillations, while the second one is used to tune the output of the first one online for further reducing the error signal using a given set of fuzzy rules. The simplex method is employed to search for optimal gains of the damping controller by minimizing the objective function in which speed deviations between generators are formulated. The feasibility of the proposed technique is validated using time-domain simulation cases in the PSCAD simulation program. It is also shown that the proposed damping scheme for IPFC works better than the static synchronous series compensator, which utilizes the same damping scheme in reducing the interarea mode of oscillations.

Optimal IPFC damping controller design based on simplex method and self-tuned fuzzy damping scheme in a two-area multimachine power system

This paper develops a novel self-tuned fuzzy damping control scheme for an interline power flow controller (IPFC) to suppress the interarea mode of oscillations in a multimachine power system. The nonlinear adaptive damping controller is based on coordinated operation of two fuzzy inference systems. The first one produces the required $q$-axis voltage reference of the quasi multipulse series converter in response to generator angle oscillations, while the second one is used to tune the output of the first one online for further reducing the error signal using a given set of fuzzy rules. The simplex method is employed to search for optimal gains of the damping controller by minimizing the objective function in which speed deviations between generators are formulated. The feasibility of the proposed technique is validated using time-domain simulation cases in the PSCAD simulation program. It is also shown that the proposed damping scheme for IPFC works better than the static synchronous series compensator, which utilizes the same damping scheme in reducing the interarea mode of oscillations.

___

  • Total harmonic distortion (THD) content
  • Table 2 summarizes voltage distortions of Buses 1 and 2 as a measure of THD. Records of the simulated cases taken at 12.5 s show that the THD values are within acceptable limits when the STFDC is activated in both control loops of the IPFC and SSSC [25]. Consequently, filtering is not required for the two FACTS devices even when GTOs are switched at the fundamental system frequency of 60 Hz.
  • Table THD values of power system bus voltages. Case 1 IPF 0.25%
  • THD for V1(L−L) 0.12% 0.10% THD for V1(L−L)
  • 0.20% THD for V1(L−L)
  • 0.20% THD for V1(L−L) 0.12% 0.08% Case 3 6. Conclusion
  • Kundur P. Power System Stability and Control. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  • Mojtaba A, Morteza T. Full-adaptive THEN-part equipped fuzzy wavelet neural controller design of FACTS devices to suppress inter-area oscillations. Neurocomputing 2013; 118: 157–170. [3] Shakarami MR, Kazemi A. Assessment of effect of SSSC stabilizer in different control channels on damping inter-area oscillations. Energy Convers Manage 2011; 52: 1622–1629.
  • Lei X, Lerch EN, Povh D. Optimization and coordination of damping controls for improving system dynamic performance. IEEE T Power Syst 2001; 16: 473–480.
  • Gyugyi L, Sen KK, Schauder CD. The interline power flow controller concept: a new approach to power flow management in transmission systems. IEEE T Power Deliver 1999; 14: 1115–1123.
  • Jiang X, Fang X, Chow JH, Edris A, Uzunovic E, Parisi M, Hopkins L. A novel approach for modeling voltage- sourced converter-based FACTS controllers. IEEE T Power Deliver 2008; 23: 2591–2598.
  • Murugan A, Thamizmani S. A new approach for voltage control of IPFC and UPFC for power flow management. In: IEEE 2013 International Conference on Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability; 10–12 April 2013; Nagercoil, India. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1376–1381.
  • Vural AM, Bayındır KC¸ . A hybrid fuzzy-PI control scheme for a quasi multi-pulse interline power flow controller including PQ decoupling feature. J Power Electron 2012; 12: 787–799.
  • Gyugyi L, Schauder CD, Sen KK. Static synchronous series compensator: a solid-state approach to the series compensation of transmission lines. IEEE T Power Deliver 1997; 12: 406–417.
  • Jyothsna TR, Vaisakh K. Design and performance evaluation of SSSC supplementary modulation controller in power systems using SPEF method. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2012; 35: 158–170.
  • Wang L, Truong DN. Comparative stability enhancement of PMSG-based offshore wind farm fed to an SG-based power system using an SSSC and an SVeC. IEEE T Power Syst 2013; 28: 336–1344.
  • Kazemi A, Karimi E. The effect of interline power flow controller (IPFC) on damping inter-area oscillations in the interconnected power systems. In: IEEE 2006 International Symposium on Industrial Electronics; 9–13 July 2006; Montreal, Canada. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1911–1915.
  • Parimi AM, Elamvazuth I, Saad N. Interline power flow controller (IPFC) based damping controllers for damping low frequency oscillations in a power system. In: IEEE 2008 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies; 24–27 November 2008; Singapore. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 334–339.
  • Banaei MR, Kami A. Interline power flow controller based damping controllers for damping low frequency oscil- lations. In: IEEE 2009 31st International Telecommunications Energy Conference; 18–22 October 2009; Incheon, South Korea. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1–6.
  • Belwanshi SM, Chandrakar VK, Dhurvey SN. Performance evaluation of IPFC by using fuzzy logic based controller for damping of power system oscillations. In: IEEE 2011 4th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology; 18–20 November 2011; Port Louis, Mauritius. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 168– 173.
  • Parimi AM, Sahoo NC, Elamvazuth I, Saad N. Dynamic modeling of interline power flow controller for small signal stability. In: IEEE 2010 International Conference on Power and Energy; 29 November–1 December 2010; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 583–588.
  • Parimi AM, Sahoo NC, Elamvazuth I, Saad N. Transient stability enhancement and power flow control in a multi- machine power system using interline power flow controller. In: IEEE 2011 International Conference on Energy, Automation, and Signal; 28–30 December 2011; Bhubaneswar, India. New York, NY, USA: IEEE. pp. 1–6.
  • Shan J, Gole AM, Annakkage UD, Jacobson DA. Damping performance analysis of IPFC and UPFC controllers using validated small-signal models. IEEE T Power Deliver 2011; 26: 446–454.
  • Vural AM, Bayındır KC¸ . Two-level quasi multi-pulse voltage source converter based generalized unified power flow controller. Int Rev Electr Eng 2011; 6: 2622–2637.
  • Hagiwara M, Fujita H, Akagi H. Performance of a self-commutated BTB HVDC link system under a single-line-to- ground fault condition. IEEE T Power Electr 2003; 18: 278–285.
  • Mudi RK, Pal NR. A robust self-tuning scheme for PI- and PD-type fuzzy controllers. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 1999; 7: 2–16.
  • Hameed S, Das B, Pant V. A self-tuning fuzzy PI controller for TCSC to improve power system stability. Electr Pow Syst Res 2008; 78: 1726–1735.
  • IEEE. Recommended Practices and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electrical Power Systems. New York, NY, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 1993.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0632
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK