Image pattern recognition technique for the classification of multiple power quality disturbances

In a practical power system, a power quality (PQ) event often consists of various types of disturbances occurring at the same time. However, most of the existing techniques are trained to classify single disturbances, and hence have very limited usage in classifying real-time data. This work proposes a novel technique to automatically detect and classify multiple disturbances that coexist in PQ monitoring data. The data obtained from PQ monitors are represented in the form of 2-dimensional (2D) images. This 2D data visualization has significant benefits, in that each type of disturbance produces a different type of edge in the image; a sag produces horizontal edges, an oscillatory transient diagonal edges, and so on. The 2D discrete wavelet transform is applied to decompose these 2D images into 4 subbands using the Haar wavelet transform. Each of the events constituting the multiple disturbances has its own signature in each of the subbands and these signatures aid in the detection of these events. Pertinent features extracted from the wavelet subbands are utilized to train decision trees. These decision trees describe the rules needed for multiple event classification. Comparison results with the S-transform classification technique indicate that the proposed technique can offer faster classification and comparable accuracy, not only for a single disturbance, but also for multiple ones. Nevertheless, its memory requirement is very meager compared to S-transform. Moreover, it performs better than 1D wavelet-based event detection and classification techniques.

Image pattern recognition technique for the classification of multiple power quality disturbances

In a practical power system, a power quality (PQ) event often consists of various types of disturbances occurring at the same time. However, most of the existing techniques are trained to classify single disturbances, and hence have very limited usage in classifying real-time data. This work proposes a novel technique to automatically detect and classify multiple disturbances that coexist in PQ monitoring data. The data obtained from PQ monitors are represented in the form of 2-dimensional (2D) images. This 2D data visualization has significant benefits, in that each type of disturbance produces a different type of edge in the image; a sag produces horizontal edges, an oscillatory transient diagonal edges, and so on. The 2D discrete wavelet transform is applied to decompose these 2D images into 4 subbands using the Haar wavelet transform. Each of the events constituting the multiple disturbances has its own signature in each of the subbands and these signatures aid in the detection of these events. Pertinent features extracted from the wavelet subbands are utilized to train decision trees. These decision trees describe the rules needed for multiple event classification. Comparison results with the S-transform classification technique indicate that the proposed technique can offer faster classification and comparable accuracy, not only for a single disturbance, but also for multiple ones. Nevertheless, its memory requirement is very meager compared to S-transform. Moreover, it performs better than 1D wavelet-based event detection and classification techniques.

___

  • [1] P.K. Dash, S.M. Mishra, M.A. Salama, A.C. Liew, “Classification of power system disturbances using a fuzzy expert system and a Fourier linear combiner”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 15, pp. 472–477, 2000.
  • [2] L. Angrisani, P. Daponte, M. D’Apuzzo, “Wavelet network-based detection and classification of transients”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 50, pp. 1425–1435, 2001.
  • [3] Z.L. Gaing, “Implementation of power disturbance classifier using wavelet-based neural networks”, Proceedings of the IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 7, 2003.
  • [4] Z.L. Gaing, “Wavelet-based neural network for power disturbance recognition and classification”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 19, pp. 1560–1568, 2004.
  • [5] A.M. Gaouda, M.M.A. Salama, M.R. Sultan, A.Y. Chikhani, “Power quality detection and classification using wavelet-multiresolution signal decomposition”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 14, pp. 1469–1476, 1999.
  • [6] G.T. Heydt, A.W. Galli, “Transient power quality problems analyzed using wavelets”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol 12, pp. 908–915, 1997.
  • [7] L. Gengyin, Z. Ming, Z. Zhiyuan, “Power quality disturbance automatic recognition based on wavelet and genetic network”, Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 Conference on Computers, Communications, Control and Power Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 1923–1926, 2002.
  • [8] F. Zhao, R. Yang, “Power quality disturbance recognition using S-transform”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 22, pp. 944–950, 2007.
  • [9] M.F. Faisal, A. Mohamed, “Identification of multiple power quality disturbances using s-transform and rule based classification technique”, Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 9, pp. 2688–2700, 2009.
  • [10] Z. Yong, C. Hao-Zhong, D. Yi-Feng, L. Gan-Yun, S. Yi-Bin, “S-transform–based classification of power quality disturbance signals by support vector machines”, Proceedings of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, Vol. 25, pp. 51–56, 2005.
  • [11] M. Faisal, A. Mohamed, H. Shareef, A. Hussain, “Power quality diagnosis using time frequency analysis and rule based techniques”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, pp. 12592–12598, 2011.
  • [12] S. Suja, J. Jerome, “Pattern recognition of power signal disturbances using S transform and TT transform”, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 32,, pp. 37–53, 2010.
  • [13] C.H. Huang, C.H. Lin, C.L. Kuo, “Chaos synchronization-based detector for power-quality disturbances classification in a power system”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 26, pp. 944–953, 2011.
  • [14] T.K. Abdel-Galil, M. Kamel, A.M. Youssef, E.F. El-Saadany, M.M.A. Salama, “Power quality disturbance classification using the inductive inference approach”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 19, pp. 1812–1818, 2004.
  • [15] H. He, J.A. Starzyk, “A self-organizing learning array system for power quality classification based on wavelet transform”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 21, pp. 286–295, 2006.
  • [16] E.P. de Aguiar, C.A.G. Marques, C.A. Duque, M.V. Ribeiro, “Signal decomposition with reduced complexity for classification of isolated and multiple disturbances in electric signals”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 24, pp. 2459–2460, 2009.
  • [17] M.V. Ribeiro, J.L.R. Pereira, “Classification of single and multiple disturbances in electric signals”, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Vol. 2007, 2007.
  • [18] D.G. Ece, O.N. Gerek, “Power quality event detection using joint 2D-wavelet subspaces”, IEEE Transactions on ¨ Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 53, pp. 1040–1046, 2004.
  • [19] O.N. Gerek, D.G. Ece, “2D analysis and compression of power quality event data”, IEEE Transactions on Power ¨ Delivery, Vol. 19, pp. 791–798, 2004.
  • [20] H. Shareef, A. Mohamed, “Power quality disturbance detection and visualization utilizing image processing methods”, Proceedings of the 14th International Middle East Power System Conference, pp. 238–244, 2010.
  • [21] http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1159/3/docs.html [22] G. Shi, F. Li, “Image denoising with optimized subband threshold”, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia App, pp. 160–164, 2003.
  • [23] S. Sardy, “Minimax threshold for denoising complex signals with waveshrink”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 48, pp. 1023–1028, 2000.
  • [24] R.C. Dugan, M.F. McGranaghan, S. Santaso, H.W. Beaty, Electrical Power Systems Quality, 2nd Edition, New York, McGraw Hill, 2002.