Economic analysis of a wind-battery hybrid system: an application for a house in Gebze, Turkey, with moderate wind energy potential

In this study, the energy demand of a house in Gebze, Turkey, is met by using wind energy as a primary energy source combined with rechargeable batteries. The wind-battery system is simulated by MATLAB while considering that energy continuity is maintained by using a sufficient number of batteries. A life-cycle cost analysis is carried out over a 20-year system lifetime because the operating time of the hybrid system is subject to the turbine life, usually assumed to be 20 years. The wind turbine generators considered are of various nominal powers, ranging from 0.6 to 450 kW. For each wind turbine, the necessary number of batteries to continuously supply the house with energy is calculated and an economic analysis of each system is performed. According to the simulation results, among the wind turbines considered in this study, Proven 2.5 (with a nominal power of 2.5 kW) appears to be the most economical turbine and produces electricity at a cost of US{\}0.82/kWh, while the optimum battery number for the Proven 2.5 wind turbine is 44. The total system cost obtained is {\}17,438.

Economic analysis of a wind-battery hybrid system: an application for a house in Gebze, Turkey, with moderate wind energy potential

In this study, the energy demand of a house in Gebze, Turkey, is met by using wind energy as a primary energy source combined with rechargeable batteries. The wind-battery system is simulated by MATLAB while considering that energy continuity is maintained by using a sufficient number of batteries. A life-cycle cost analysis is carried out over a 20-year system lifetime because the operating time of the hybrid system is subject to the turbine life, usually assumed to be 20 years. The wind turbine generators considered are of various nominal powers, ranging from 0.6 to 450 kW. For each wind turbine, the necessary number of batteries to continuously supply the house with energy is calculated and an economic analysis of each system is performed. According to the simulation results, among the wind turbines considered in this study, Proven 2.5 (with a nominal power of 2.5 kW) appears to be the most economical turbine and produces electricity at a cost of US{\}0.82/kWh, while the optimum battery number for the Proven 2.5 wind turbine is 44. The total system cost obtained is {\}17,438.

___

  • B. Alboyaci, B. Dursun, “Electricity restructuring in Turkey and the share of wind energy production”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 33, pp. 2499-2505, 2008.
  • B. Dursun, B. Alboyaci, “The contribution of wind-hydro pumped storage systems in meeting Turkey’s electric energy demand”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, pp. 1979-1988, 2010.
  • C. Gokcol, B. Dursun, B. Alboyaci, E. Sunan, “Importance of biomass energy as alternative to other sources in Turkey”, Energy Policy, Vol. 37, pp. 424-431, 2009.
  • A. Hepbasli, O. Ozgener, “A review on the development of wind energy in Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 8, pp. 257-276, 2003.
  • European Wind Energy Association, Wind in Power: European Statistics in 2009, Brussels, EWEA, 2009. Available at http://www.ewea.org/Şleadmin/ewea documents/documents/statistics/general stats 2009.pdf.
  • Enerji Piyasası D¨uzenleme Kurumu, T¨urkiye R¨uzgar Enerjisi Kurulu Kapasitesi, Ankara, EPDK. Available at: http://www2.epdk.org.tr/lisans/elektrik/yek/yek.html. J.F. Manwell, J.G. McGowan, A.L. Rogers, Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
  • S. Tolun, S. Mente¸s, Z. Aslan, M.A. Y¨ukselen, “The wind energy potential of G¨ok¸ceada in the northern Aegean Sea”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 6, pp. 679-685, 1995.
  • N. Eskin, H. Artar, S. Tolun, “Wind energy potential of G¨ok¸ceada Island in Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 12, pp. 839-851, 2008.
  • S. ˙Incecik, F. Erdo˘gmu¸s, “An investigation of the wind power potential on the western coast of Anatolia”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 6, pp. 863-865, 1995.
  • Z. S¸en, A.D. S¸ahin, “Regional assessment of wind power in western Turkey by the cumulative semivariogram method”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 12, pp. 169-177, 1997.
  • V.M. Karsli, C. Ge¸cit, “An investigation on wind power potential of Nurda˘gı-Gaziantep, Turkey”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 28, pp. 823-830, 2003.
  • M. Durak, Z. S¸en, “Wind power potential in Turkey and Akhisar case study”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 25, pp. 472, 2002.
  • F. T¨urksoy, “Investigation of wind power potential at Bozcaada, Turkey”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 6, pp. 917-923, C. D¨undar, D. Inan, “Investigation of wind energy application possibilities for a speciŞc island (Bozcaada) in Turkey”, Proceedings of World Renewable Energy Conference, Vol. 9, pp. 822-826, 1996.
  • M. Bilgili, B. S¸ahin, A. Kahraman, “Wind energy potential in Antakya and ˙Iskenderun regions, Turkey”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 29, pp. 1733-1745, 2004.
  • M.S. Gen¸c, M. G¨ok¸cek, “Evaluation of wind characteristics and energy potential in Kayseri, Turkey”, Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 135, pp. 33-43, 2009.
  • M. Bilgili, B. Sahin, “Investigation of wind energy density in the southern and southwestern region of Turkey”, Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 135, pp. 12-20, 2009.
  • A.N. Celik, “A statistical analysis of wind power density based on the Weibull and Rayleigh models at the southern region of Turkey”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 29, pp. 593-604, 2003.
  • A.N. Celik, “A techno-economic analysis of wind energy in southern Turkey”, International Journal of Green Energy, Vol. 4, pp. 233-247, 2007.
  • A. Ucar, F. Balo, “Assessment of wind power potential for turbine installation in coastal areas of Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, pp. 1901-1912, 2010.
  • M. G¨ok¸cek, M.S. Gen¸c, “Evaluation of electricity generation and energy cost of wind energy conversion systems (WECSs) in Central Turkey”, Applied Energy, Vol. 86, pp. 2731-2739, 2009.
  • S.A. Akda˘g, ¨O. G¨uler, “Evaluation of wind energy investment interest and electricity generation cost analysis for Turkey”, Applied Energy, Vol. 87, pp. 2574-2580, 2010.
  • Wikipedia, “Gebze”. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebze. D.A. Spera, T.R. Richard, “ModiŞed power law equations for vertical wind proŞles”, Conference and Workshop on Wind Energy Characteristics and Wind Energy Siting, Portland, 1979.
  • M. Kaltschmitt, W. Streicher, A. Wiese, Renewable Energy: Technology, Economics, and Environment, Berlin, Springer, 2007.
  • E.K. Akpinar, S. Akpinar, “An assessment on seasonal analysis of wind energy characteristics and wind turbine characteristics”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 46, pp. 1848-1867, 2005.
  • Mutlu Batteries. Available at: http://www.mutlu.com.tr/index.cfm?lang=eng. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, HOMER Getting Started Guide, Version 2.1, Golden, CO, USA, NREL, A. ¨Ozdamar, H. Yildiz, ¨O. S¸ar, “Wind energy utilization in a house in Izmir, Turkey”, International Journal of Energy Resources, Vol. 25, pp. 253-261, 2001.
  • Wind & Sun Ltd., Price List - Charge Controllers. Available at: http://www.windandsun.co.uk/Prices/prices charge controllers.htm. S. Mathew, Wind Energy: Fundamentals, Resource Analysis and Economics, Berlin, Springer, 2006.
  • P. Yilmaz, M.H. Hocaoglu, A.E.S. Konukman, “A pre-feasibility case study on integrated resource planning including renewables”, Energy Policy, Vol. 36, pp. 1223-1232, 2008.