___

• [1] Beron M, Bernardis H, Miranda E, Riesco D, Pereira M et al. Measuring the understandability of WSDL specification, Web service understanding degree approach and system. Computer Science and Information Systems 2016; 13 (3): 779-807.
• [2] Grottke M, Nikora A, Trivedi K. An empirical investigation of fault types in space mission system software. In: IEEE Dependable Systems and Networks Conference; 2010. pp. 447-456.
• [3] Torres E, Callou G, Andrade E. A hierarchical approach for availability and performance analysis of private cloud storage services. Computing 2018; 100 (6): 621-644.
• [4] Yang M, Min G, Yang W, Li Z. Software rejuvenation in cluster computing systems with dependency between nodes. Computing 2014; 96: 503-526.
• [5] Levitin G, Xing L, Huang H. Optimization of partial software rejuvenation policy. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2019; 182: 63-72.
• [6] Mahmood Z, Bowes D, Hall T, Lane P, Petric J. Reproducibility and replicability of software defect prediction studies. Information and Software Technology 2018; 99: 148-163.
• [7] Masadeh R, Sharieh A, Sliet A. Grey wolf optimization applied to the maximum flow problem. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Science 2017; 14: 95-100.
• [8] Ning G, Trivedi KS, Hu H, Cai KY. Multi-granularity software rejuvenation policy based on continuous time Markov chain. In: IEEE Workshop on Software Aging and Rejuvenation; Hiroshima, Japan; 2011. pp. 32–37.
• [9] Fung S, Poon CH, Zheng F. Improved randomized online scheduling of intervals and jobs. Theory of Computing Systems 2014; 55: 202-228.
• [10] Hu B, Chicano F. Special issue on meta-heuristics for combinatorial optimization. Journal of Heuristics 2018; 24: 239-242.
• [11] Yang YY, Yang B, Wang SH. A dynamic ant-colony genetic algorithm for cloud service composition optimization. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2019; 102 (1-4): 355-368.
• [12] Sun D, Chang G, Guo Q, Wang C. A dependability model to enhance security of cloud environment using systemlevel virtualization techniques. In: Proceeding of 1st Conference on Pervasive Computing, Signal Processing and Applications; Washington, USA; 2010. pp. 305-310.
• [13] Dantas J, Matos R, Araujo J, Maciel P. Eucalyptus-based private clouds: availability modeling and comparison to the cost of a public cloud. Computing 2015; 97 (11): 1121-1140.
• [14] Araujo J, Matos R, Alves V, Maciel P, Souza F et al. Software aging in the eucalyptus cloud computing infrastructure: characterization and rejuvenation. ACM Journal of Emerging Technology Computer System 2014; 10 (1): 1-22.
• [15] Guo J, Song X, Wang Y, Zhang B, Li X. The measurement of software aging damage and rejuvenation strategy for discrete web services. Advanced Materials Research 2012; 2: 432-437.
• [16] Kulkarni P. Software rejuvenation and workload distribution in virtualized system. International Journal of Innovated Research in Computer and Communication Engineering 2015; 3 (6): 5966-5973.
• [17] Torquato M, Umesh IM, Maciel P. Models for availability and power consumption evaluation of a private cloud with VMM rejuvenation enabled by VM live Migration. Journal of Supercomputing 2018; 74 (9): 4817-4841.
• [18] Ghayathri J, Pannirselvam S. Categorization of web services based on QOS constraint using decision tree classifier. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Creative Engineering 2016; 6 (3): 338-344.
• [19] Umesh IM, Srinivasan GN. Optimum software aging prediction and rejuvenation model for virtualized environment. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 2016; 3 (3): 572-578.
• [20] Mooij A, Eggen G, Hooman J, Wezep H. Cost-effective industrial software rejuvenation using domain-specific models. In: Proceedings of 8th Conference on Theory and Practice of Model Transformations; Berlin; Germany; 2015. pp. 66-81.
• [21] Sumathi G, Raju R. Software aging analysis of web server using neural networks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications 2012; 3: 11-21.
• [22] Nivetha SK, Asokan R. Energy efficient multiconstrained optimization using hybrid ACO and GA in MANET routing. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 2016; 24: 3698-3713.
• [23] Liu M, Wang L, Gao L, Li H, Zhao H et al. A Web Service trust evaluation model based on small-world networks. Knowledge-Based Systems 2014; 57: 161-167.
• [24] Baek S, Lee J, Lee B. Improving fault traceability of web application by utilizing software revision information and behavior model. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems 2018; 12 (2): 1-20.
• [25] Gupta R, Kamal R, Suman U. A QoS-supported approach using fault detection and tolerance for achieving reliability in dynamic orchestration of web services. Journal of Information Technology 2018; 10 (1): 71-81.
• [26] Meng H, Liu J, Hei X. Modeling and optimizing periodically inspected software rejuvenation policy based on geometric sequences. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2015; 133: 184-191.
• [27] Machida F, Miyoshi N. An optimal stopping problem for software rejuvenation in a job processing system. In: Workshop on Software Reliability Engineering; Washington, USA; 2015. pp. 139-143.
• [28] Ning G, Zhao J, Lou Y, Alonso J, Matias R et al. Optimization of two-granularity software rejuvenation policy based on the Markov regenerative process. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 2016; 65 (4): 1630-1646.
• [29] Cotroneo D, Iannillo AK, Natella R, Pietrantuono R, Russo S. The software aging and rejuvenation repository. IEEE Transactions on Software Reliability Engineering 2015; 2: 108-113.
• [30] Dohi D, Okamura H, Trivedi KS. Optimizing software rejuvenation policies under interval reliability criteria. In: Proceedings of 9th Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing; Fukuoka, Japan; 2012. pp. 478-485.
• [31] Agepati R, Gundala N, Amari S. Optimal software rejuvenation policies. In: Reliability and Maintainability Symposium; Orlando, FL, USA; 2013. pp. 341-347.
• [32] Kaur C, Arora S. Chaotic whale optimization algorithm. Computational Design and Engineering 2018; 5: 275-284.
• [33] Tanyildizi E. A novel optimization method for solving constrained and unconstrained problems: modified golden sine algorithm. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 2018; 26: 3287-3304.
• [34] Karakuzu C. On the performance of newsworthy meta-heuristic algorithms based on point of view fuzzy modeling. Turkish Journal Of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences 2017; 25: 4706-4721.
• [35] Eberhart R, Kennedy J. Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE International Conference on Neural Network; Perth; Australia; 1995. pp. 1942-1948.
• [36] Mirjalili S. The ant lion optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software 2015; 88: 80-98.
• [37] Holland JH. Genetic algorithm. Scientific American 1992; 267: 66-72.
• [38] Mirjalili S, Lewis A. The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software 2016; 95: 51-67.
• [39] Gharehchopogh F, Gholizadeh H. A comprehensive survey: whale optimization algorithm and its applications. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 2018; 48: 1-24.
• [40] Mohammad HM, Umar S, Rahid T. A systematic and meta-analysis survey of whale optimization algorithm. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2019; 2019: 1-25.
• [41] Mardukhi F, Nemat Bakhsh N, Zamanifar K, Barati A. QoS decomposition for service composition using genetic algorithm. Applied Soft Computing 2013; 13: 3409-3421.