Competitive unit maintenance scheduling in a deregulated environment based on preventing market power

With the advent of electricity markets, the traditional approach to unit maintenance scheduling (UMS) needs to undergo major changes in order to be compatible with competitive environment structures. The transition from a vertical power system to a competitive structure makes many challenges for policymakers and market designers. In this paper, a new approach to UMS in competitive electricity markets is presented. The main part of this study involves both how to treat generating companies (GENCOs) fairly and how to guarantee power system security during the maintenance scheduling. This paper advances the UMS in the electricity market so that one can determine which maintenance plans are to be selected while guaranteeing power system security and ensuring fair competition among GENCOs. The main contribution of this study is the constructing of a new kind of UMS to prevent market power and economic withholding. In order to guarantee power system security, a probabilistic approach of reliability analysis is presented. This probabilistic methodology is designed based on the health levelization and well-being analysis technique. The optimal strategy profile is defined by a genetic algorithm, so it can strike the right balance between profit and security with fair competition. In the end, maintenance scheduling as numerical results for 9 GENCOs of a large-scale IEEE reliability test system is applied to show the applicability of the proposed framework.

Competitive unit maintenance scheduling in a deregulated environment based on preventing market power

With the advent of electricity markets, the traditional approach to unit maintenance scheduling (UMS) needs to undergo major changes in order to be compatible with competitive environment structures. The transition from a vertical power system to a competitive structure makes many challenges for policymakers and market designers. In this paper, a new approach to UMS in competitive electricity markets is presented. The main part of this study involves both how to treat generating companies (GENCOs) fairly and how to guarantee power system security during the maintenance scheduling. This paper advances the UMS in the electricity market so that one can determine which maintenance plans are to be selected while guaranteeing power system security and ensuring fair competition among GENCOs. The main contribution of this study is the constructing of a new kind of UMS to prevent market power and economic withholding. In order to guarantee power system security, a probabilistic approach of reliability analysis is presented. This probabilistic methodology is designed based on the health levelization and well-being analysis technique. The optimal strategy profile is defined by a genetic algorithm, so it can strike the right balance between profit and security with fair competition. In the end, maintenance scheduling as numerical results for 9 GENCOs of a large-scale IEEE reliability test system is applied to show the applicability of the proposed framework.

___

  • Generation No. 12 13 14 15 16 17 × × × × × × Mixe d in tege r programming 18 × × × × × × × Bende rs ’ dec om p osition 19 × × × × × × Bende rs ’ dec om p osition 20 × × × × × Duali ty the o ry 21 × × × × GA 22 × × Hybri d P SO J.H. Kim, J.K. Park, “A new game-theoretic framework for maintenance strategy analysis”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 18, pp. 698–706, 2003.
  • J.H. Kim, J.K. Park, “A new game-theoretic approach to maintenance scheduling problems in competitive electricity markets”, Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Vol. 3, pp. 1510–1515, 2002.
  • A.J. Conejo, R. Garcia-Bertrand, M. Diaz-Salazar, “Generation maintenance scheduling in restructured power systems”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 20, pp. 984–992, 2005.
  • State Electricity Regulatory Commission of the People’s Republic of China, “Survey report for power dispatching of Nordic and England electricity market”, available at http://www.serc.gov.cn (no date given). G. Lu, C.Y. Chung, K.P. Wong, F. Wen, “Unit maintenance scheduling coordination mechanism in electricity market environment”, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 2, pp. 646–654, 2008.
  • Z. Gao, Z. Ren, “Competitive maintenance scheduling and settlement base on bidding in electricity market”, IEEE Industry Applications Conference, Vol. 4, pp. 2684–2689, 2005.
  • Y. Wang, E. Handschin, “Unit maintenance scheduling in open systems using genetic algorithm”, Proceedings of the IEEE Transmission and Distribution Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 334–339, 1999.
  • G. Lu, C.Y. Chung, K.P. Wong, F. Wen, “Unit maintenance scheduling in electricity market environment considering transmission congestion”, 7th IEE International Conference on Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management, Vol. 1, pp. 527–532, 2006.
  • J. Wang, F. Wen, “Compensation of profit losses for generation companies associated with the regulation mechanism for maintenance scheduling”, Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA, Vol. 17, pp. 67–70, 2005.
  • J. Wang, F. Wen, R. Yang, Y. Ni, F.F. Wu, “Towards the development of an appropriate regulation mechanism for maintenance scheduling of generating units in electricity market environment”, Proceedings of the IEEE PES General Meeting, Vol. 2, pp. 1198–1202, 2004.
  • L. Cai, B. Wu, “A regulation for congestion of generator maintenance in a deregulated system”, IEEE Power System Technology Conference, Vol. 4, pp. 23–26, 2003.
  • M.K.C. Marwali, S.M. Shahidepour, “Integrated generation and transmission maintenance scheduling with network constraint”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 13, pp. 1063–1068, 1998.
  • I.K. Yu, C.S. Chou, Y.H. Song, “Application of the ant colony search algorithm to short-term generation scheduling problem of thermal units”, International Conference on Power System Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 551–556, 1998.
  • C. Sharma, S. Bahadorsingh, “A MATLAB-based power generator maintenance scheduler”, IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, Vol. 3, pp. 1344–1348, 2004.
  • M.Y. Damavandi, H. Seifi, M.M. Pedram, “Generation unit maintenance scheduling considering gas network constraints”, International Conference on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems, pp. 1–5, 2009.
  • C. Feng, X. Wang, F. Li, “Optimal maintenance scheduling of power producers considering unexpected unit failure”, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 3, pp. 460–471, 2009.
  • D. Chattopadhyay, K. Bhattacharya, J. Parikh, “A systems approach to least-cost maintenance scheduling for an interconnected power system”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 10, pp. 2002–2007, 1995.
  • Y. Fu, M. Shahidehpour, Z. Li, “Security-constrained optimal coordination of generation and transmission maintenance outage scheduling”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 22, pp. 1302–1313, 2007.
  • M.K.C. Marwali, S.M. Shahidehpour, “Long term transmission and generation maintenance scheduling with network fuel and emission constraint”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 14, pp. 1160–1165, 1999.
  • T.M. Al-Khamis, S. Vemuri, L. Lemonidis, J. Yellen, “Unit maintenance scheduling with fuel constraints”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 933–939, 1992.
  • R. Eshraghnia, M.H. Modir Shanechi, R. Riahi, “The effect of energy purchase cost in maintenance schedule of generating units based on genetic algorithm”, Midterm Conference on Control and Automation, pp. 1–8, 2007. Y.S. Park, J.H. Kim, J.H. Park, J.H. Hong, “Generating unit maintenance scheduling using hybrid PSO algorithm”, 14th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Applications to Power Systems, pp. 656–661, 2007.
  • W. Li, Risk Assessment of Power Systems: Models, Methods, and Applications, New York, Wiley, 2005.
  • J. Enderyi, Reliability Modeling in Electrical Power Systems, New York, Wiley, 1978.
  • R. Billinton, R.N. Allan, Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, New York, Plenum Press, 1996.
  • R. Billinton, A. Abdulwhab, “Short term generating unit maintenance scheduling in a deregulated power system using a probabilistic approach”, IEE Proceedings – Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 150, pp. 463–468, 200 S. Martorell, S. Carlos, A. Sanchez, V. Serradell, “Constrained optimization of test intervals using a steady-state genetic algorithm”, Reliability Engineering System Safety, Vol. 67, pp. 215–232, 2000.
  • Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee, “IEEE reliability test system”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 14, pp. 1010–1020, 1991.