___

• El-Kahlout ID, Oflazer K. Initial explorations in English to Turkish statistical machine translation. In: Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation; 2006; Stroudsburg, PA, USA. pp. 7-14.
• El-Kahlout ID, Oflazer K. Exploiting morphology and local word reordering in English-to-Turkish phrase-based statistical machine translation. IEEE T Audio Speech 2010; 18: 1313-1322.
• Oflazer K, El-Kahlout ID. Exploring different representational units in English-to-Turkish statistical machine translation. In: Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation; 2007; Prague, Czech Republic. pp. 25-32.
• Oflazer K. Statistical machine translation into a morphologically complex language. In: Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics; 2008; Haifa, Israel. pp. 376-387.
• Yeniterzi R, Oflazer K. Syntax-to-morphology mapping in factored phrase-based statistical machine translation from English to Turkish. In: 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 2010; Stroudsburg, PA, USA. pp. 454-464.
• Koehn P. Statistical Machine Translation. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
• Gorgun O, Yildiz OT, Solak E, Ehsani R. English-Turkish parallel treebank with morphological annotations and its use in tree-based smt. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Methods; 2016; Rome, Italy. pp. 510-516.
• Marcus MP, Marcinkiewicz MA, Santorini B. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Comput Linguist 1993; 19: 313-330.
• Erguvanlı ET. The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press, 1984.
• Hutchins J. ALPAC: The (In)famous Report. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2003.
• Thouin B. The METEO system. Practical Experience of Machine Translation. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland Publishing Co., 1982.
• Berger AL, Brown PF, Pietra SAD, Pietra VJD, Gillett JR, Lafferty JD, Mercer RL, Printz H, Ures L. The Candide system for machine translation. In: Workshop on Human Language Technology; 1994; New Jersey, USA. pp. 157-162.
• Och FJ, Ney H. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Comput Linguist 2003; 29: 1951.
• Vogel S, Ney H, Tillman C. HMM-based word alignment in statistical translation. In: 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics; 1996; Copenhagen, Denmark. pp. 836-841.
• Och FJ, Tillmann C, Ney H. Improved alignment models for statistical machine translation. In: Joint Conference of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora; 1999; Maryland, USA. pp. 20-28.
• Och FJ, Ney H. The alignment template approach to statistical machine translation. Comput Linguist 2004; 30: 418-449.
• Oflazer K. Turkish and its challenges for language processing. Language Resources and Evaluation 2014; 48: 639-653.
• Chiang D. A hierarchical phrase-based model for statistical machine translation. In: 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 2005; Ann Arbor, MI, USA. pp. 263-270.
• Chiang D. Hierarchical phrase-based translation. Comput Linguist 2007; 33: 201-228.
• Chiang D, Lopez A, Madnani N, Monz C, Resnik P, Subotin M. The Hiero machine translation system: extensions, evaluation, and analysis. In: Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing; 2005; Vancouver, Canada. pp. 779-786.
• Gorgun O, Yildiz OT. A novel approach to morphological disambiguation for Turkish. In: Computer and Information Sciences II; 2011; Germany. pp. 77-83.
• Papineni K, Roukos S, Ward T, Zhu W. BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computation Linguistics; 2002; Philadelphia, PA, USA. pp. 311-318.