A computer-aided diagnosis system for breast cancer detection by using a curvelet transform

The most common type of cancer among women worldwide is breast cancer. Early detection of breast cancer is very important to reduce the fatality rate. For the hundreds of mammographic images scanned by a radiologist, only a few are cancerous. While detecting abnormalities, some of them may be missed, as the detection of suspicious and abnormal images is a recurrent mission that causes fatigue and eyestrain. In this paper, a computer-aided diagnosis system using the curvelet transform (CT) algorithm is proposed for interpreting mammograms to improve the decision making. The purpose of this study is to develop a method for the characterization of the mammography as both normal and abnormal regions, and to determine its diagnostic performance to differentiate between malignant and benign ones. The multiresolution CT that was recently derived is used to differentiate among 200 mammograms: 50 malignant, 50 benign, and 100 normal. A support vector machine and the k-nearest neighbor algorithm are used as classifiers to build the diagnostic model and are also used for the principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis for further dimensional reduction and feature selection. A dataset from the Mammographic Image Analysis Society database is used for testing the method.

A computer-aided diagnosis system for breast cancer detection by using a curvelet transform

The most common type of cancer among women worldwide is breast cancer. Early detection of breast cancer is very important to reduce the fatality rate. For the hundreds of mammographic images scanned by a radiologist, only a few are cancerous. While detecting abnormalities, some of them may be missed, as the detection of suspicious and abnormal images is a recurrent mission that causes fatigue and eyestrain. In this paper, a computer-aided diagnosis system using the curvelet transform (CT) algorithm is proposed for interpreting mammograms to improve the decision making. The purpose of this study is to develop a method for the characterization of the mammography as both normal and abnormal regions, and to determine its diagnostic performance to differentiate between malignant and benign ones. The multiresolution CT that was recently derived is used to differentiate among 200 mammograms: 50 malignant, 50 benign, and 100 normal. A support vector machine and the k-nearest neighbor algorithm are used as classifiers to build the diagnostic model and are also used for the principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis for further dimensional reduction and feature selection. A dataset from the Mammographic Image Analysis Society database is used for testing the method.

___

  • N.R. Pal, B. Bhowmick, S.K. Patel, S. Pal, J. Das, “A multi-stage neural network aided system for detection of micro-calcifications in digitized mammograms”, Neurocomputing, Vol. 71, pp. 2625–2634, 2008.
  • J.C. Fu, S.K. Lee, S.T.C. Wong, J.Y. Yeh, A.H. Wang, H.K. Wu, “Image segmentation, feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Vol. 29, pp. 419–29, 2005.
  • R.M. Rangayyan, F.J. Ayres, J.E.L. Desautels, “A review of computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer: toward the detection of subtle signs”, Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 344, pp. 312–348, 2007.
  • M.L. Giger, N. Krassemeijer, S.G. Armato, “Computer aided diagnosis in medical imaging”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 20, pp. 1205–1208, 2001.
  • R.J. Ferrari, R.M. Rangayyan, J.E.L. Desautels, A.F. Frere, “Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 20, pp. 953–964, 2001.
  • L. Bocchi, G. Coppini, J. Nori, G. Valli, “Detection of single and clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using fractals models and neural networks”, Medical Engineering and Physics, Vol. 26, pp. 303–312, 2004. I. Christoyianni, A. Koutras, E. Dermatas, G. Kokkinakis, “Computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digitized mammograms”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Vol. 26, pp. 309–319, 2002.
  • F.A. L´ ucio Campos, A.C. Silva, A.K. Barros, “Diagnosis of breast cancer in digital mammograms using independent component analysis and neural networks”, Proceedings of the 10th Iberoamerican Congress conference on Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis and Applications, Vol. 3773, pp. 460–469, 2005.
  • D.D. Costa, F. L´ ucio Campos, A.K. Barros, “Classification of breast tissue in mammograms using efficient coding”, Biomedical Engineering on Line, Vol. 10, pp. 50, 2011.
  • S.G. Mallat, “A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 7, pp. 674–693, 1989.
  • R. Mousa, Q. Munib, A. Moussa, “Breast cancer diagnosis system based on wavelet analysis and fuzzy-neural”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 28, pp. 713–723, 2005.
  • S. Liu, C.F. Babbs, E.J. Delp, “Multiresolution detection of speculated lesions in digital mammograms”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 10, pp. 874–884, 2001.
  • M. Ceylan, Y. ¨ Ozbay, N.O. U¸ can, E. Yıldırım, “A novel method for lung segmentation on chest CT images: complexvalued artificial neural network with complex wavelet transform”, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, Vol. 18, 2010.
  • J.C. Yang, J.W. Shin, D.S. Park, “Comparing study for detecting microcalcifications in digital mammogram using wavelets”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3177, pp. 409–415, 2004.
  • E.A. Rashed, I.A. Ismail, S.I. Zaki, “Multiresolution mammogram analysis in multilevel decomposition”, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 28, pp. 286–292, 2007.
  • C.B.R. Ferreira, D.L. Borges, “Analyses of mammogram classification using a wavelet transform decomposition”, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 24, pp. 973–982, 2003.
  • F. Moayedi, Z. Azimifar, R. Boostani, S. Katebi, “Contourlet based mammography mass classification”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4633, pp. 923–934, 2007.
  • E.J. Cand` es, D.L. Donoho, “Curvelets, multiresolution representation, and scaling laws”, SPIE Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing VIII, Vol. 4119, 2000.
  • K.P. Soman, K.I. Ramachandran, “Insight Into Wavelets: From Theory to Practice”, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., 2005.
  • F.E. Ali, I.M. El-Dokany, A.A. Saad, F.E. Abd El-Samie, “Curvelet fusion of MR and CT images”, Progress in Electromagnitics Research, Vol. 3, pp. 215–224, 2008.
  • M.M. Eltoukhy, I. Faye, B.B. Samir, “Using curvelet transform to detect breast cancer in digital mammogram”, 5th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, pp. 340–345, 2009.
  • F. Murtagh, J. Starck, “Wavelet and curvelet moments for image classification: application to aggregate mixture grading”, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 29, pp. 1557–1564, 2008.
  • M.M. Eltoukhy, I. Faye, B.B. Samir, “Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Vol. 34, pp. 269–276, 2010.
  • S. Dehghani, M.A. Dezfooli, “Breast cancer diagnosis system based on contourlet analysis and support vector machine”, World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 13 pp. 1067–1076, 2011.
  • M.M. Eltoukhy, I. Faye, B.B. Samir, “A statistical based feature extraction method for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiresolution representation”, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 42, pp. 123–128, 2012.
  • E.J. Cand` es, D.L. Donoho, “Curvelets: a surprisingly effective non-adaptive representation for objects with edges”, In: C. Rabut, A. Cohen, L.L. Schumaker, eds., Curves and Surfaces, Nashville, TN, Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 105–120, 2000.
  • E.J. Cand` es, L. Demanet, D.L. Donoho, L. Ying, “Fast discrete curvelet transform”, SIAM Multiscale Modeling and Simulations, Vol. 5, pp. 861–899, 2007.
  • Ericson B., “The very fast curvelet transfom.ppt”, Available at: http://homepages.cae.wisc.edu/ ∼ece734/project/s06/eriksson.ppt, 2012.
  • M.S. Nixon, A.S. Aguado, Feature Extraction and Image Processing, 2nd ed., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier, 2008.
  • A.R. Webb, Statistical Pattern Recognition, 2nd ed., New York, Wiley, 2002.
  • MIAS Data Base Web Page, Available at: http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/info/mias.html, 2012.