Optimal design of a flux reversal permanent magnet machine as a wind turbine generator

Flux reversal permanent magnet generators are well suited for use as wind turbine generators owing to their high torque generation ability and magnetic gear. However, they suffer from poor voltage regulation due to their high winding inductance. In this paper, a design optimization method is proposed for flux reversal generators in wind turbine applications. The proposed method includes a new multiobjective function. Cost, volume of the generator, and mass of the permanent magnet are considered in it independently and simultaneously. Besides the new objective function, the main superiority of this paper compared with published papers is considering winding inductance in optimization procedures as a constraint and analyzing the optimization results for different values of it. Also, for the first time, the equations for permanent magnet sizing are considered based on a demagnetization curve for designing a flux reversal generator. For this purpose, a step-by-step design procedure is proposed and sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the sensitivity of output parameters to specific electrical loading, the height of the permanent magnets, and the machine length-to-diameter ratio. Then a multiobjective optimization based on a genetic algorithm is carried out and the best combination of pole number and number of slots/pole/phase is obtained. Then, for this combination, the optimum value of the constraint is obtained, too. Then specifications and dimensions of the optimum flux reversal machine as a wind turbine generator is presented. Finally, a time-stepping finite element method is used to validate the design and optimization results.

___

  • [1] Boldea I, Zhang L, Naser SA. Theoretical characterization of flux reversal machine in low-speed servo drives-the pole-PM configuration. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2002; 37 (5): 1549–1556. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2002.804759
  • [2] Niu S, Ho SL, Fu WNA. Novel direct-drive dual-structure permanent magnet machine. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2010; 45: 2035-2039. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2010.2041197
  • [3] Wu ZZ, Zhu ZQ, Zhan HL. Comparative analysis of partitioned stator flux reversal PM machines having fractionalslot nonoverlapping and integer-slot overlapping windings. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 2016; 31: 776-788. doi: 10.1109/TEC.2016.2525826
  • [4] More DS, Fernandes BG. Analysis of flux-reversal machine based on fictitious electrical gear. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 2010; 25: 940-946. doi: 10.1109/TEC.2010.2048330
  • [5] More DS, Fernandes BG. Modeling and performance of three-phase 6/14 pole flux reversal machine. IET Electric Power Applications 2013; 6 (2): 131-139. doi: 10.1049/iet-epa.2012.0058
  • [6] Yang Y, Wang X, Zhang Z. Analytical calculation of magnetic field and electromagnetic performance of flux reversal machines. IET Electric Power Applications 2014; 7 (5): 167-177. doi: 10.1049/iet-epa.2013.0187
  • [7] Guo K, Fang S, Lin H, Yang H, Huang Y. 3-D analytical analysis of magnetic field of flux reversal linear-rotary permanent-magnet actuator. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2016; 53 (5): 1-5. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2017.2662079
  • [8] Zhu X, Hua W, Wang W, Huang W. Analysis of back-EMF in flux-reversal permanent magnet machines by air gap field modulation theory. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2019; 66 (5): 3344-3355. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2854575
  • [9] Xie K, Li D, Qu R, Yu Z, Gao Y. Analysis of a flux reversal machine with quasi-halbach magnets in stator slot opening. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2019; 55 (2): 1250-1260. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2018.2873540
  • [10] Zhu S, Zheng P, Yu B, Cheng L, Fan Y. Performance analysis and modeling of a tubular staggered-tooth transverseflux PM linear machine. Energies 2016; 9 (3): 163. doi: 10.3390/en9030163
  • [11] Kou B, Luo J, Yang X, Zhang L. Modeling and analysis of a novel transverse-flux flux-reversal linear motor for long-stroke application. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2016; 63 (10): 5237-5247. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2581142
  • [12] Rauch SE, Johnson LJ. Design principles of flux-switching alternators. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 1995; 74 (3): 1261–1268. doi: 10.1109/AIEEPAS.1955.4499226
  • [13] Boldea I, Nasar SA. Three phase flux reversal machine. IET Electric Power Applications 1999; 146 (2): 139–145. doi: 10.1049/ip-epa:19990114
  • [14] Kim TH, Lee J. A study of the design for the flux reversal machine. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2004; 40 (4): 2053–2055. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2004.832488
  • [15] Yang H, Lin H, Zhu ZQ, Lyu S, Liu Y. Design and analysis of novel asymmetric-stator-pole flux reversal PM machine. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (in press). doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2896097
  • [16] Lee CHT, Chau KT, Liu C. Design and analysis of a cost-effective magnet less multi-phase flux-reversal DCfield machine for wind power generation. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 2015; 30 (4): 1555-1563. doi: 10.1109/TEC.2015.2443155
  • [17] Zhu X, Hua W. An improved configuration for cogging torque reduction in flux-reversal permanent magnet machines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2016; 53 (5): 1-1. doi: 10.1109/CEFC.2016.7816063
  • [18] Zhu X, Hua W, Wu Z. Cogging torque suppression in flux-reversal permanent magnet machines. IET Electric Power Applications 2017; 12 (1): 135-143. doi: 10.1049/iet-epa.2017.0342
  • [19] Li D, Gao Y, Qu R. Design and analysis of a flux reversal machine with evenly distributed permanent magnets. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2017; 54 (1): 162-173. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2017.2750998
  • [20] Huang S, Luo J, Leonardi F, Lipo TAA. General approach to sizing and power density equations for comparison of electrical machines. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 1998; 34 (1): 92-97. doi: 10.1109/28.658727
  • [21] Gieras JF, Wing M. Permanent Magnet Motor Technology: Design and Application. 2nd edition. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker, 2002.
  • [22] Mi C. Analytic design of permanent magnet traction drive motors. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2005; 42 (7): 1751-1755. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2006.874511