Statistical Earthquake Frequency Analysis for Western Anatolia

In order to apply a statistical earthquake frequency analysis to western Anatolia, the area has been restricted within coordinates 36.50º-40º North and 26.00º-30.00º East. Data used in the analysis belong to the instrumental period from 1.1.1900 to 10.11.2006 (Ms ≥ 4.0). The earthquake record was assumed to be representative of longer periods and the possibility of clusters of seismicity or of extreme magnitude events were ignored. The study area has been divided into eight zones with different seismotectonic properties. All computations have been performed for these zones separately. The earthquake magnitude series is termed as the instantaneous peak over the threshold (POT) and the series of the largest earthquake magnitude per year in a zone as the annual maximum (AM). POT and AM series of the surface wave magnitude (Ms) are obtained from the catalog of the Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI) of Bosphorus University. Exceedance probabilities and return periods of earthquakes of various magnitudes have been calculated for each zone. This paper discusses the comparative assessment of four advanced distributions to provide accurate and reliable earthquake estimates for all sub-regions in western Anatolia. The models compared are the Exponential (EXP), Extreme value distribution Type 1 (Gumbel) (GUM), Log Pearson Type 3 (LP3), and Generalised Pareto (GP). Model parameters are estimated using the method of moments and the quantitative assessment of each model is based on the Anderson Darling Test results and quantile estimation of each model. On the basis of these comparisons, it is concluded that the GP and GUM distributions are most appropriate for describing the peaks over the threshold earthquake series and annual maximum earthquake data in western Anatolia. The results show that b values in the computed magnitude-frequency relations range from 0.40-0.76. These results are supported by previous studies of the Aegean and surrounding area (Papazachos 1990; Öncel & Wilson 2004; Sayıl & Osmanşahin 2007). The highest b value has been obtained for Zone 7 (Gökova Gulf). As a result of the GUM, EXP and GP models, Zone 8 has the lowest risk for magnitude 7.0 and longest return periods; however, LP3 model results show that Zone 7 has the lowest risk for magnitude 7.0 and the longest return period.

Statistical Earthquake Frequency Analysis for Western Anatolia

In order to apply a statistical earthquake frequency analysis to western Anatolia, the area has been restricted within coordinates 36.50º-40º North and 26.00º-30.00º East. Data used in the analysis belong to the instrumental period from 1.1.1900 to 10.11.2006 (Ms ≥ 4.0). The earthquake record was assumed to be representative of longer periods and the possibility of clusters of seismicity or of extreme magnitude events were ignored. The study area has been divided into eight zones with different seismotectonic properties. All computations have been performed for these zones separately. The earthquake magnitude series is termed as the instantaneous peak over the threshold (POT) and the series of the largest earthquake magnitude per year in a zone as the annual maximum (AM). POT and AM series of the surface wave magnitude (Ms) are obtained from the catalog of the Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI) of Bosphorus University. Exceedance probabilities and return periods of earthquakes of various magnitudes have been calculated for each zone. This paper discusses the comparative assessment of four advanced distributions to provide accurate and reliable earthquake estimates for all sub-regions in western Anatolia. The models compared are the Exponential (EXP), Extreme value distribution Type 1 (Gumbel) (GUM), Log Pearson Type 3 (LP3), and Generalised Pareto (GP). Model parameters are estimated using the method of moments and the quantitative assessment of each model is based on the Anderson Darling Test results and quantile estimation of each model. On the basis of these comparisons, it is concluded that the GP and GUM distributions are most appropriate for describing the peaks over the threshold earthquake series and annual maximum earthquake data in western Anatolia. The results show that b values in the computed magnitude-frequency relations range from 0.40-0.76. These results are supported by previous studies of the Aegean and surrounding area (Papazachos 1990; Öncel & Wilson 2004; Sayıl & Osmanşahin 2007). The highest b value has been obtained for Zone 7 (Gökova Gulf). As a result of the GUM, EXP and GP models, Zone 8 has the lowest risk for magnitude 7.0 and longest return periods; however, LP3 model results show that Zone 7 has the lowest risk for magnitude 7.0 and the longest return period.

___

  • AKYOL, N., ZHU, L., MITCHELL, B.J., SÖZBİLİR, H. & KEKOVALI, K. 2006. Crustal structure and local seismicity in western Anatolia. Geophysical Journal International 166, 1259–1269.
  • BARKA, A.A. & REILINGER, R. 1997. Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region: deduced from GPS, neotectonic and seismicity data. Annali di Geophisica XI, 587–610.
  • BOZKURT, E. 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey–a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta 14, 3–30
  • BOZKURT, E. & SÖZBİLİR, H. 2004. Tectonic evolution of the Gediz Graben: field evidence for an episodic, two-stage extension in western Turkey. Geological Magazine 141, 63–79.
  • CHOULAKIAN, V. & STEPHENS, M.A. 2001. Goodness-of-fit tests for the generalized pareto distribution. Technometrics 43, 478–484.
  • D’AGOSTINO, R.B. & STEPHENS, M.A. 1986. Goodness-of-Fit Techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York.
  • DARGAHI-NOUBARY, G.R. 1986. A method for predicting future large earthquakes using extreme order statistics. Physics of the Earth and Planetary International 42, 241–245.
  • EMRE, Ö., ÖZALP, S., DOĞAN, A., ÖZAKSOY, V., YILDIRIM, C. & GÖKTAŞ, F. 2005. Active Faults in Around İzmir and Potential of Earthquake Occurrence. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute (MTA) of Turkey Report no. 10754 [in Turkish, unpublished].
  • GRINGORTENS, I.I. 1963. A plotting rule for extreme probability paper. Journal of Geophysical Researh 68, 813–814.
  • GUTENBERG, B. & RICHTER, C.F. 1954. Seismicity of the Earth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersy.
  • HOSKING, J.R.M. 1990. L-Moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order Statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 52,105–124.
  • HOSKING, J.R.M. & WALLIS, J.R. 1997. Regional Frequency Analysis – An Approach Based on L-Moments. Cambridge University Press.
  • KAGAN, Y.Y. 1993. Statistics of characteristic earthquakes. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 83, 7–24.
  • KIRATZI, A.A. & LOUVARI, E. K. 2001. On the active tectonics of the Aegean Sea and the surrounding lands. In: TAYMAZ, T. (ed),Proceedings of Symposia on Seismotectonics of the North-Western Anatolia- Aegean and Recent Turkish Earthquakes. İstanbul Technical University, Turkey, 88–95.
  • KOTTEGODA, N.T. & ROSSO, R. 1997. Statistics, Probability and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers. McGraw-Hill.
  • LAIO, F. 2004. Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling goodness of fit tests for extreme value distributions with unknown parameters. Water Resources Research 40, W09308, doi: 10.1029/ 2004WR003204
  • MAIN, I. 1996. Statistical physics seismogenesis, and seismic hazard. Review of Geophysics 34, 433–462.
  • OCAKOĞLU, N., DEMİRBAĞ, E. & KUŞÇU, İ. 2004. Neotectonic structures in the area offshore of Alaçatı, Doğanbey and Kuşadası (western Turkey): evidence of strike-slip faulting in Aegean Province. Tectonophsyics 391, 67–83.
  • OCAKOĞLU, N., DEMİRBAĞ, E. & KUŞÇU, İ. 2005. Neotectonic structures in İzmir Gulf and surrounding regions (western Turkey): evidences of strike-slip faulting with compression in the Aegean extensional regime. Marine Geology 219, 155–171.
  • ÖNCEL, A.O. & WILSON, T. 2004. Correlation of seismotectonic variables and GPS strain measurements in western Turkey. Journal of Geophsical Research 109, B11306.
  • PAPAZACHOS, B.C. 1990. Seismicity of the Aegean and surrounding area. Tectonophysics 178, 287–308.
  • PAPAZACHOS, B.C. & KIRATZI, A.A. 1996. A detailed study of the active crustal deformation in the Aegean and surrounding area. Tectonophysics 253, 129–153.
  • ROSBJERG, D., MADSEN, H. & RASMUSSEN, P.F. 1992. Prediction in partial duration series with generalized pareto-distributed exceedances. Water Resources Research 28, 3001–3010.
  • SARI, C. & ŞALK, M. 2006. Sediment thicknesses of the western Anatolia graben structures determined by 2D and 3D analysis using gravity data.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 26, 39–48.
  • ŞAROĞLU, E., EMRE, Ö. & KUŞÇU, İ. 1992. Active Fault Map of Turkey. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute (MTA) of Turkey Publications.
  • SAYIL, N. & OSMANŞAHİN, İ. 2007. An investigation of seismicity for western Anatolia.Natural Hazards. DOI 10.1007/s11069-007-9141-2.
  • ŞENGÖR, A.M.C., GÖRÜR, N. & ŞAROĞLU, F. 1985. Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study. In: BIDDLE, K. & CHRISTIE-BLICK, N. (eds), Strike-Slip Deformation, Basin Formation and Sedimentation. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publications 37, 227–264.
  • STEDINGER, J.R., VOGEL, R.M. & FOUFOULA-GEORGIOU, E. 1993. Frequency analysis of extreme events. In: MAIDMENT, D.A. (ed),Handbook of Hydrology. Chapter 18, Mcgraw-Hill, New York.
  • STEPHENS, M.A. 1974. EDF statistics for goodness-of-fit and some comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, 730–737.
  • THOMPSON, M.E., BAISE, G.L. & VOGEL, R.M. 2007. A global index earthquake approach to probabilistic assessment of extremes. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, B06314.
  • URBANCIC, T.I., TRIFU, C.I. & LONG, J.M. 1992. Space-time correlations of b value with stress changes associated with the 1999 November 12, Düzce (Turkey) eartquake (Mw= 7.1). Geophysical Journal International 153, 229–241.
  • UTSU, T. 1999. Representation and analysis of the earthquake size distribution: a historical review and some new approaches. Pure and Applied Geophysics 155, 509–535.
  • WEEKS, J., LOCKNER, D. & BYERLEE, J. 1978. Change in b-values during movement on cut surfaces in granite. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 68, 333–341.
  • WESSEL, P. & SMITH, W.H.F. 1995. New version of the generic mapping tools (GMT). EOS Transactions 76, p. 329
  • WIEMER, S. & KATSUMADA, K. 1999. Spatial variability of seismicity parameters in aftershock zones. Journal of Geophysical Research 104, 13135–13151.
Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0985
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Çamlıdere Volkanik Kayaçlarının Evriminde Magma Karışımı için Dokusal ve Bileşimsel Kanıt (Galatya Volkanik Provensi), Orta Anadolu, Türkiye

ELİF VAROL, ABİDİN TEMEL & ALAIN GOURGAUD

Trace Fossils of the Upper Eocene-Lower Oligocene Transition of the Manipur, Indo-Myanmar Ranges (Northeast India)

RAJKUMAR HEMANTA SINGH, FRANCISCO J. RODRÍGUEZ-TOVAR &

Post-Miocene deformation in south of the Galatean Volcanic Province, NW of Central Anatolia (Turkey)

Bora ROJAY, Aykut KARACA

Arıburnu Yalıtaşının (Gelibolu Yarımadası, Türkiye) Kökeni ve Yaşı Üzerine

AHMET EVREN ERGİNAL, NAFİYE GÜNEÇ KIYAK, MUSTAFA BOZCU

On the origin and age of the Arıburnu beachrock, Gelibolu Peninsula, Turkey

Ahmet ERTEK, Ali SUNGUR, Mustafa BOZCU, Hakan GÜNGÜNEŞ, Gülen TÜRKER, Nafiye Güneç KIYAK, Ahmet Evren ERGİNAL

Platinum-Group Minerals (PGM) and Other Solid Inclusions in the Elbistan-Kahramanmaraş Mantle-hosted Ophiolitic Chromitites, South-eastern Turkey: Their Petrogenetic Significance

İBRAHİM UYSAL

Quaternary Calcrete Development in the Mersin Area, Southern Turkey

MUHSİN EREN, SELAHATTİN KADİR, ZÜBEYDE HATİPOĞLU & MURAT GÜL

The Ampullinid Gastropod Globularia (Swainson 1840) from the Late Thanetian-Early Ilerdian Kırkkavak Formation (Polatlı-Ankara) of the Tethyan Realm

YAVUZ OKAN & İZZET HOŞGÖR

Post-Miocene Deformation in the South of the Galatean Volcanic Province, NW of Central Anatolia (Turkey)

BORA ROJAY & AYKUT KARACA, BORA ROJAY

Punctuated Exhumation and Foreland Basin Formation and Infilling in (Circum)-Central Anatolia (Turkey) Associated with the Neo-Tethyan Closure

DURMUŞ BOZTUĞ, HALUK TEMİZ, RAYMOND JONCKHEERE &