Analysis of precursory seismicity patterns in Zagros (Iran) by CN algorithm

This study illustrates the application of the CN algorithm for the analysis of precursory seismicity patterns in the Zagros region (Iran), an area characterized by a complex seismotectonic setting and by remarkable seismic activity. CN is a formally defined and widely tested algorithm for intermediate-term middle-range earthquake prediction, based on the analysis of routinely compiled earthquake catalogs. To allow its application, the global and regional catalogs available for the territory of Iran have been analyzed so as to compile a data set sufficiently complete and homogeneous over a time span of about 3 decades, as required for CN application. A number of tests have been performed with respect to changes in the input catalogs, assuming different magnitude completeness levels as well as considering different magnitude thresholds for the selection of target earthquakes. Different variants of the regionalization have been outlined according to the seismotectonic model, and it was concluded that precursory seismicity patterns for the largest events need to be researched in the whole Zagros tectonic domain. Accordingly, an experiment was set up aimed at validation of intermediate-term middle-range prediction of earthquakes with magnitude M >= 6.0 in the Zagros region. Starting in March 2012, CN prediction results have been routinely updated based on the events with M >= Mc = 4.0 as they are reported in the International Seismological Centre catalog.

Analysis of precursory seismicity patterns in Zagros (Iran) by CN algorithm

This study illustrates the application of the CN algorithm for the analysis of precursory seismicity patterns in the Zagros region (Iran), an area characterized by a complex seismotectonic setting and by remarkable seismic activity. CN is a formally defined and widely tested algorithm for intermediate-term middle-range earthquake prediction, based on the analysis of routinely compiled earthquake catalogs. To allow its application, the global and regional catalogs available for the territory of Iran have been analyzed so as to compile a data set sufficiently complete and homogeneous over a time span of about 3 decades, as required for CN application. A number of tests have been performed with respect to changes in the input catalogs, assuming different magnitude completeness levels as well as considering different magnitude thresholds for the selection of target earthquakes. Different variants of the regionalization have been outlined according to the seismotectonic model, and it was concluded that precursory seismicity patterns for the largest events need to be researched in the whole Zagros tectonic domain. Accordingly, an experiment was set up aimed at validation of intermediate-term middle-range prediction of earthquakes with magnitude M >= 6.0 in the Zagros region. Starting in March 2012, CN prediction results have been routinely updated based on the events with M >= Mc = 4.0 as they are reported in the International Seismological Centre catalog.

___

  • Bak P, Christensen K, Danon L, Scanlon T (2002). Unified scaling law for earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 88: 178501–178504.
  • Berberian M (1976). Contribution to the Seismotectonics of Iran (Part II). Report No. 39. Tehran: Geological Survey of Iran.
  • Berberian M, King GC (1981). Towards a palaeogeography and tectonics evolution of Iran. Can J Earth Sci 18: 210–265.
  • Hessami K, Jamali F, Tabassi F (2003). Major Active Faults of Iran [map]. Tehran: International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology.
  • Jackson DD, Kagan YY (1999). Testable earthquake forecasts for 19 Seismol Res Lett 70: 393–403.
  • Jordan T, Chen Y, Gasparini P, Madariaga R, Main I, Marzocchi W, Papadopoulos G, Sobolev G, Yamaoka K, Zschau J (2011). Operational earthquake forecasting: state of knowledge and guidelines for utilization. Ann Geophys 54: 316–391.
  • Kagan YY, Jackson DD (2000). Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes. Geophys J Int 143: 438–453.
  • Keilis-Borok VI (1996). Intermediate term earthquake prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 3748–3755.
  • Keilis-Borok VI, Knopoff L, Rotwain IM (1980). Burst of aftershocks, long-term precursors of strong earthquakes. Nature 283: 259– 2
  • Keilis-Borok VI, Kossobokov VG (1990). Premonitory activation of earthquake flow: algorithm M8. Phys Earth Planet Inter 61: 73–
  • Keilis-Borok VI, Primakov I (1997). Earthquake prediction and earthquake preparedness: the possibilities to reduce the damage from earthquakes. In: Fourth Workshop on Non-Linear Dynamics and Earthquake Prediction, 6–24 October 1997, Trieste.
  • Keilis-Borok VI, Rotwain IM (1990). Diagnosis of time of increased probability of strong earthquakes in different regions of the world: algorithm CN. Phys Earth Planet Inter 61: 57–72.
  • Kossobokov VG, Romashkova LL, Keilis-Borok VI, Healy JH (1999). Testing earthquake prediction algorithms: statistically significant advance prediction of the largest earthquakes in the CircumPacific, 1992–1997. Phys Earth Planet Inter 111: 187–196.
  • Mirzaei N, Gao M, Chen YT (1999). Delineation of potential seismic sources for seismic zoning of Iran. J Seismol 3: 17–30.
  • Molchan GM, Dmitrieva OE, Rotwain IM, Dewey J (1990). Statistical analysis of the results of earthquake prediction, based on burst of aftershocks. Phys Earth Planet Inter 61: 128–139.
  • Nowroozi AA (1976). Seismotectonic provinces of Iran. B Seismol Soc Am 66: 1246–1249.
  • Nuttli OW (1973). Seismic wave attenuation and magnitude relations for eastern North America. J Geophys Res 78: 876–885.
  • Panza GF, Peresan A, Magrin A, Vaccari F, Sabadini R, Crippa B, Marotta AM, Splendore R, Barzaghi R, Borghi A et al. (2011). The SISMA prototype system: integrating geophysical modeling and earth observation for time-dependent seismic hazard assessment. Natural Hazards 69: 1179–1198.
  • Peresan A, Costa G, Panza GF (1999a). Seismotectonic model and CN earthquake prediction in Italy. Pure Appl Geophys 154: 281–306.
  • Peresan A, Costa G, Panza GF (1999b). A proposal of regionalization for the application of the CN earthquake prediction algorithm to the Italian territory. Ann Geophys 42: 281–306.
  • Peresan A, Kossobokov V, Panza GF (2012). Operational earthquake forecast/prediction. Rendiconti Lincei 23: 131 –138.
  • Peresan A, Kossobokov V, Romashkova L, Panza GF (2005). Intermediate-term middle-range earthquake predictions in Italy: a review. Earth Sci Rev 69: 97–132.
  • Peresan A, Rotwain I, Zaliapin I, Panza GF (2002). Stability of intermediate-term earthquake predictions with respect to random errors in magnitude: the case of Central Italy. Phys Earth Planet Inter 130: 117–127.
  • Peresan A, Zuccolo E, Vaccari F, Gorshkov A, Panza GF (2011). Neo-deterministic seismic hazard and pattern recognition techniques: time-dependent scenarios for North-Eastern Italy. Pure Appl Geophys 168: 583–607.
  • Rhoades DA, Evison FF (2004). Long-range earthquake forecasting with every earthquake a precursor according to scale. Pure Appl Geophys 161: 47–71.
  • Rhoades DA, Evison FF (2005). Test of the EEPAS forecasting model on the Japan earthquake catalog. Pure Appl Geophys 162: 1271–1290.
  • Rotwain IM, Novikova O (1999). Performance of the earthquake prediction algorithm CN in 22 regions of the world. Phys Earth Planet Inter 111: 207–213.
  • Shebalin PN (1992). Automatic Duplicate Identification in Set of Earthquake Catalogs Merged Together. US Geological Survey Open File Report 92–401 (Appendix II).
  • Stoecklin J (1968). Structural history and tectonics of Iran: a review. AAPG Bull 52: 1229–1258.
  • Takin M (1972). Iranian geology and continental drift in the Middle East. Nature 235: 147–150.
  • Tatar M, Hatzfeld D, Martinod J, Walpersdorf A, Ghafori-Ashtiany M, Chery J (2002). The present-day deformation of the central Zagros (Iran) from GPS measurements. Geophys Res Lett 29: 1927–1930.
  • Tavakoli B, Ghafori-Ashtiany M (1999). Seismic hazard assessment of Iran. Ann Geophys 42: 1013–1021.
  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. B Seismol Soc Am 84: 974–1002.