OLIVIER MONOD, CATHERINE KUZUCUOĞLU & ARAL İ. OKAY, Aral İ. OKAY

216

A Miocene Palaeovalley Network in the Western Taurus (Turkey)

Lower Miocene conglomerates in the Köprü and Manavgat basins contain pebbles that can be confidently traced back to their source areas, owing to their distinctive lithologies. Among others, are the green Huğlu volcanics (Late Trias), known only in allochthonous units from the Beyşehir region, or the Alanya blueschists, restricted to the Sugözü unit in the Alanya Massif. The problem is to find out how this detrital material could have travelled about eighty kilometres through the Taurus calcareous units during the Miocene. Fortunately, the present drainage system is not yet fully reorganised in the Taurus, and large areas of the chain still retain fossil morphologies. These may be seen in the upper karstic areas of the chain, where a large part of a high surface (1500-2200 m) is preserved. On this surface several dry valleys, some of them 400 m deep, with meanders and tributaries, have been recognised. They are disconnected from the present drainage, and represent fragments of a former network directed NE-SW, at right angles to the structures of the Taurus chain. The age of this network may be attributed indirectly to the Early Miocene. On the other hand, the presence of blueschist fragments in conglomerates of the Aksu Basin cannot be explained through a NE-SW-directed drainage system, and implies instead that the Alanya Massif extends to the west below the Miocene cover of the Antalya Gulf. Later, Late Miocene faulting fragmented the high surface and disrupted the drainage system. Uplift of the Taurus chain followed in the Pliocene and Quaternary, and is responsible for the extensive karstic circulation seen today, which left aside remnants of the ancient morphology of the chain.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

fluviatile network, tracer pebbles, Miocene morphology, karst, Taurus, Turkey

A Miocene Palaeovalley Network in the Western Taurus (Turkey)

Lower Miocene conglomerates in the Köprü and Manavgat basins contain pebbles that can be confidently traced back to their source areas, owing to their distinctive lithologies. Among others, are the green Huğlu volcanics (Late Trias), known only in allochthonous units from the Beyşehir region, or the Alanya blueschists, restricted to the Sugözü unit in the Alanya Massif. The problem is to find out how this detrital material could have travelled about eighty kilometres through the Taurus calcareous units during the Miocene. Fortunately, the present drainage system is not yet fully reorganised in the Taurus, and large areas of the chain still retain fossil morphologies. These may be seen in the upper karstic areas of the chain, where a large part of a high surface (1500-2200 m) is preserved. On this surface several dry valleys, some of them 400 m deep, with meanders and tributaries, have been recognised. They are disconnected from the present drainage, and represent fragments of a former network directed NE-SW, at right angles to the structures of the Taurus chain. The age of this network may be attributed indirectly to the Early Miocene. On the other hand, the presence of blueschist fragments in conglomerates of the Aksu Basin cannot be explained through a NE-SW-directed drainage system, and implies instead that the Alanya Massif extends to the west below the Miocene cover of the Antalya Gulf. Later, Late Miocene faulting fragmented the high surface and disrupted the drainage system. Uplift of the Taurus chain followed in the Pliocene and Quaternary, and is responsible for the extensive karstic circulation seen today, which left aside remnants of the ancient morphology of the chain.
Keywords:

fluviatile network, tracer pebbles, Miocene morphology, karst, Taurus, Turkey,

PDF

___

  • AKAY, E., UYSAL, S., POISSON, A., CRAVATTE, J. & MÜLLER, C. 1985. Stratigraphy of the Antalya Neogene Basin. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Turkey 28, 105–119.
  • ANDREW, T. & ROBERTSON, A.H.F. 2002. The Beyflehir-Hoyran-Hadim nappes: genesis and emplacement of Mesozoic marginal and oceanic units of the Northern Neotethys in southern Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society, London 159, 529–543.
  • ARPAT, E. & ÖZGÜL, N. 1972. Rock glaciers around Geyik Da¤, Central Taurides. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Bulletin 78, 28–32.
  • BABINOT, J.-F. 2002. Ostracodes miocènes de séries annexes aux bassins de Köprüçay et de Manavgat, région d’Antalya (sud Turquie). Revue Paléobiologie, Genève 21, 735–757.
  • BIROT, P. & DRESCH, J. 1956. La Méditerrannée et le Moyen Orient, t. 2, 526 p.
  • BLUMENTHAL, M. 1951. Recherches géologiques dans le Taurus Occidental dans l’arrière-pays d’Alanya. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Publications D5, 134 p.
  • ÇINER, A., DEYNOUX, M. & ÇÖREKÇ‹O⁄LU, E. 1999. Hummocky moraines in the Namaras and Susam Valleys, Central Taurides, SW Turkey. Quaternary Science Reviews 18, 659–669.
  • DE BROEKERT, P. & SANDIFORD, M. 2005. Buried inset-valleys in the eastern Yilgarn Craton, western Australia: geomorphology, age, and allogenic control. The Journal of Geology 113, 471–493.
  • DEYNOUX, M., ÇINER, A., MONOD, O., KARAB›Y›KO⁄LU, M., MANATSCHAL, G. &
  • TUZCU, S. 2005. Facies architecture and depositional evolution of alluvial fan to fan-delta complexes in the tectonically active Miocene Köprüçay Basin, Isparta Angle, Turkey. Sedimentary Geology 173, 315–343.
  • DUMONT, J.-F. & KEREY, E. 1975. K›rkkavak fay›: bat› Toroslar ile Köprüçay Baseni s›n›r›nda kuzey–güney du¤rultu at›ml› fay [K›rkkavak fault: A N–S-trending strike-slip fault at the contact between the western Taurides and Köprüçay Basin]. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Turkey 18, 59–62 [in Turkish with English abstract].
  • EKMEKÇ‹, M. 2003. Review of Turkish karst with emphasis on tectonic and palaeogeographic controls. Acta Carsologica 32, 205–218.
  • ER‹fl, K., BASSANT, P. & ÜLGEN, U. 2005. Tectono-stratigraphic evolution of an Early Miocene incised valley-fill in the Mut Basin, southern Turkey. Sedimentary Geology 173, 151–185.
  • FLECKER, R., ROBERTSON, A.H.F., POISSON, A. & MÜLLER, C. 1995. Facies and tectonic significance of two contrasting Miocene basins in south coastal Turkey. Terra Nova 7, 221–232.
  • FORD, D.C. & WILLIAMS, P.W. 1989. Karst Geomorphology and Hydrology. Unwin Hyman, London, 583 p.
  • GÖKDENIZ, S. 1981. Recherches géologiques dans le Taurus occidental entre Karaman et Ermenek. Les séries à Tuffites vertes triasiques.
  • PhD Thesis, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, 202 p [unpublished].
  • GUTNIC, M., MONOD, O., POISSON, A. & DUMONT. J.-F. 1979, Géologie des Taurides occidentales. Mémoire Société géologique de France 137, 1–112.
  • ILGAR, A. & NEMEC, W. 2005. Early Miocene lacustrine deposits and sequence stratigraphy of the Ermenek Basin, central Taurides, Turkey. Sedimentary Geology 173, 233–275.
  • KARABIYIKO⁄LU, M., ÇINER, A, MONOD, O., DEYNOUX, M., TUZCU, S. & ÖRÇEN, S., 2000. Tectonosedimentary evolution of the Miocene Manavgat Basin, Western Taurids, Turkey. In: BOZKURT, E., WINCHESTER, J.A. & PIPER, J.A.D. (eds.), Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and the Surrounding Area. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 173, 475–498.
  • KOÇY‹⁄‹T, A. & ÖZACAR, A. 2003. Extensional neotectonic regime through the NE edge of the outer Isparta Angle, SW Turkey: new field and seismic data. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 12, 67–90.
  • KOÇY‹⁄‹T, A., ÜNAY, E. & SARAÇ, G. 2000. Episodic graben formation and extensional neotectonic regime in west Central Anatolia and the Isparta Angle: a case study in the Aksehir-Afyon Graben, Turkey.
  • In: BOZKURT, E., WINCHESTER, J.A. & PIPER, J.A.D. (eds.), Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and the Surrounding Area. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 173, 405–421.
  • LOUIS, H. 1956. Die Enstehung der Poljen und ihre Stellung in der Karstabstragung, auf Grund von Beobachtungen im Taurus. Erdkunde Archiv für wissenschaftliche Geographie X, 33–53.
  • MONOD, O. 1977. Recherches géologiques dans le Taurus Occidental au sud de Beyflehir (Turquie). PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud Orsay, 442 p [unpublished].
  • MONOD, O. 1979. Carte géologique du Taurus Occidental au sud de Beysehir et Notice explicative. Editions du CNRS, Paris, 60 p.
  • NAZIK, L. 1992. Beyflehir Gölü Güneybat›s› ile Kembos Polyesi Aras›n›n Karst Jeomorfolojisi [Karst Geomorphology of the Area between Kembos Polye and SW Beyflehir Lake]. PhD thesis, ‹stanbul Üniversitesi, 298 p [in Turkish with English abastract, unpublished].
  • OCAKO⁄LU, F. 2002. Palaeoenvironmental analysis of a Miocene basin in the high Taurus (southern Turkey) and its palaeogeographical and structural significance. Geological Magazine 139, 473–487.
  • OKAY, A.‹. & ÖZGÜL, N. 1984. HP/LT metamorphism and the structure of the Alanya Massif, southern Turkey: an allochthonous composite tectonic sheet. In: ROBERTSON, A.H.F. & DIXON, J.E. (eds.), The Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 14, 429–439
  • POISSON, A., WERNLI, R., SAGULAR, E.K. & TEM‹Z, H. 2003. New data concerning the age of the Aksu Thrust in the south of the Aksu Valley, Isparta Angle (SW Turkey): consequences for the Antalya Basin and the Eastern Mediterranean. Geological Journal 38, 311–327.
  • RIMMELÉ, G., OBERHÄNSLI, R., CANDAN, O., GOFFÉ, B. & JOLIVET, L. (in press) The wide distribution of the HP-LT rocks in the Lycian belt (W Turkey): implications for the accretionary wedge geometry.
  • fiENEL, M. 2002. Geological Map of Turkey (1/500000), Konya Sheet. Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (MTA) Publications, Ankara.
  • ZILBERMAN, E. 1992. Remnants of Miocene landscape in the central and northern Negev and their paleogeographical implications. Israel Geological Survey Bulletin 83, 1–54.
Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0985
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Origin and tectonic significance of the metamorphic sole and isolated dykes of the Divriği ophiolite (Sivas, Turkey): Evidence for slab break-off prior te ophiolite emplacement

Hüseyin YILMAZ, Durmuş BOZTUĞ, Osman PARLAK

Origin and Tectonic Significance of the Metamorphic Sole and Isolated Dykes of the Divriği Ophiolite (Sivas, Turkey): Evidence for Slab Break-off prior to Ophiolite Emplacement

OSMAN PARLAK, HÜSEYİN YILMAZ & DURMUŞ BOZTUĞ

Mineral-Chemical Constraints on the Miocene Calc-alkaline and Shoshonitic Volcanic Rocks of Western Turkey: Disequilibrium Phenocryst Assemblages as Indicators of Magma Storage and Mixing Conditions

ERCAN ALDANMAZ

Mohr-Circle-Based Rotational Invariants of a Magnetotelluric Data Set from the Thrace Region of Turkey: Geological Implications

MURAT BAYRAK, AYSAN GÜRER, Ö. FEYZİ GÜRER

Eosen Yafll› Sarayc›k Granodiyoritinin Çevresindeki Dokanak Baflkalafl›m› (Do¤u Pontidler, Türkiye)

GÜLTEKİN TOPUZ

A Miocene Palaeovalley Network in the Western Taurus (Turkey)

OLIVIER MONOD, CATHERINE KUZUCUOĞLU & ARAL İ. OKAY, Aral İ. OKAY