The Turkish-German Bridge: A Unique Socio-Spatial Construction in Kreuzberg

With the migration of Turkish people to Germany came the need to negotiate identity in a different space. Interactions and connections with their origin space and destination space create an opportunity for a new type of hybrid identity and manifestation in the neighborhoods where they live. The Kreuzberg neighborhood in Berlin is a place with ephemeral, unspoken borders, where Turkish-German residents face inclusion and exclusion on both sides. This dual-othering has a deep impact on the social psychology of this group and how socio-spatial practices are negotiated. This article examines how Turkish-Germans in Kreuzberg re-appropriate their identity and its spatial component to produce a unique space of their own.

Keywords:

Urban Sociology, Social Construction of Space, Migration, Thirdspace hybridity,

PDF

___

Aktürk, Ş. (2011). Regimes of Ethnicity: Comparative Analysis of Germany, the Soviet Union/Post-Soviet Russia, and Turkey. World Politics, 63(1), 115-164.
Atasü Topçuoğlu, R. and Akbaş, E. (2011). An Attempt to See the Soul of the Change: Kreuzberg from Margins into the Center. Sosyoekonomi Society, Issue 2011.
Aydıngün, A. (2002). Creating, recreating and redefining ethnic identity: Ahiska/Meskhetian Turks in Soviet and post-Soviet contexts. Central Asian Survey, 12(2), 185-197.
Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and Boundaries: the Social Organization of Culture Difference. Boston: Little, Brown.
Faist, T. 1998. “Transnational Social Spaces out of International Migration: Evolution, Significance and Future Prospects.” Archives Europeennes De Sociologie/European Journal of Sociology/Europaeisches Archiv für Soziologie, 39(2), 213-246.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Parity.
Güney, S., Kabaş, B. and Pekman. C. (2017). The Existential Struggle of Second-Generation Turkish Immigrants in Kreuzberg: Answering Spatiotemporal Change. Space and Culture, 20(1), 42-55.
Hinze, A. M. (2013). Turkish Berlin: Integration Policy & Urban Space. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Hochmuth, H. (2017). The return of Berlin-Kreuzberg. Brought back from the margins by memory. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 25(4), 470-480.
Howard, M. M. (2012). Germany’s Citizenship Policy in Comparative Perspective. German Politics & Society, 30(1), 39-51.
Jenkins, R. (1996). Social Identity. London and New York: Routledge.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (2014). Critique of Everyday Life, the One-Volume Edition. London: Verso.
Ludewig, A. (2017). Documenting self-loathing or ‘We are proud of not being proud:’ Neukölln Unlimited and Prinzessinnenbad as examples of failed integration. Journal of European Studies, 47(3), 275–289.
Mayer, M. (2013). New Lines of Division in the New Berlin. In M. Bernt, B. Grell, and A. Holm (Eds.), The Berlin Reader (pp. 95-106). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Molotch, H., Freudenburg, W., and Paulsen, K. (2000). History Repeats Itself, But How? City Character, Urban Tradition, and the Accomplishment of Place. American Sociological Review, 65(6), 791–823.
Özyürek, E. (2009). ‘The Light of the Alevi Fire Was Lit in Germany and then Spread to Turkey:’ A Transnational Debate on the Boundaries of Islam. Turkish Studies, 10(2), 233-253.
Rittersberger-Tılıç, H. (1998). “Development and Reformulation of a Returnee Identity as Alevi.” In: T. Olsson, E. Özdalga, and C. Raudvere (Eds.), Alevi Identity (pp. 69-78). Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul.
Stehle, M. (2006). Narrating the Ghetto, Narrating Europe: From Berlin, Kreuzberg to the Banlieues of Paris. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 3(3), 48-70.
Sökefeld, M. (2008). Struggling for Recognition: the Alevi Movement in Germany and in Transnational Space. New York: Berghahn Books.
Tsing, A. (2004). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.