Speciation of Manganese Using a Pneumatic Flow Injection Analysis-Tandem Spectrometer System
A pneumatic flow injection-tandem spectrometer system, without a delivery pump, was used for the speciation of manganese (Mn). In this system the suction force of the pneumatic nebulizer of a flame atomic absorption spectrometer (FAAS) was used for solution delivery through the manifold. Mn(VII) and total Mn (Mn(VII) and Mn(II)) concentrations were determined using a UV-Vis spectrometer and FAAS, respectively. The Mn(II) concentration was determined by the difference between the two. The calibration curves were linear up to 15.00 mg L-1 for Mn(VII) and total Mn, with a detection limit of 0.08 mg L-1 and 0.05 mg L-1 for Mn(VII) and Mn, respectively. The mid-range precision and accuracy were < 1.89% and \pm 2.50% for the 2 species, respectively, at a sampling rate of 80 samplings h-1. This system was used for the determination of Mn(VII) and Mn(II) in spiked and natural water, as well as industrial water.
Speciation of Manganese Using a Pneumatic Flow Injection Analysis-Tandem Spectrometer System
A pneumatic flow injection-tandem spectrometer system, without a delivery pump, was used for the speciation of manganese (Mn). In this system the suction force of the pneumatic nebulizer of a flame atomic absorption spectrometer (FAAS) was used for solution delivery through the manifold. Mn(VII) and total Mn (Mn(VII) and Mn(II)) concentrations were determined using a UV-Vis spectrometer and FAAS, respectively. The Mn(II) concentration was determined by the difference between the two. The calibration curves were linear up to 15.00 mg L-1 for Mn(VII) and total Mn, with a detection limit of 0.08 mg L-1 and 0.05 mg L-1 for Mn(VII) and Mn, respectively. The mid-range precision and accuracy were < 1.89% and \pm 2.50% for the 2 species, respectively, at a sampling rate of 80 samplings h-1. This system was used for the determination of Mn(VII) and Mn(II) in spiked and natural water, as well as industrial water.
___
- S. Li, Essential Elements and Health, p.141, LightIndustry Press, Beijing, 1988.
- Y. Zhou and G. Zhu, Talanta 44, 2041-2049 (1997).
- J.R. Castillo and M. Fernanden, Microchem J. 39, 224-251 (1989).
- D. Xuezhi, L. Deliang, C. Chunshan and Z. Jingwei, Talanta 50, 947-952 (1999).
- J.F. Van Staden and L.G. Kluever, Anal. Chim. Acta 350, 15-20 (1997).
- A.R. Bowie, P.R. Fielden, R.D. Lowe and R.D. Snook, Analyst 120, 2119-2127 (1995).
- W.S. Fyfe, Anal. Chem. 23, 174-175 (1951).
- M. Zaw and B. Chiswell, Talanta 42, 27-40 (1995).
- G.W. Luther, D.B. Nuzzio and J. Wu, Anal. Chim. Acta 284, 473-480 (1994).
- E.R. Nightingale, G.W. Wilcox and A.D. Zielinski, Anal. Chem. 32, 625-628 (1960).
- A.X.S. Qian, G.H.F. He and X. Han, Analyst 126, 239-241 (2001).
- X.H. Lu and M.G. Lu, Spectrosc. Spectral Anal. 12, 121-125 (1992).
- S.B. Khoo, M.K. Soh, Q. Cai, M.R. Khan and S.X. Guo, Electroanal. 9, 45 -51 (1997).
- K. Kargosha and M. Noroozifar, Turk. J. Chem. 27, 227-233 (2003).
- G.F. Pearson and G.M. Greenway, Trends in Anal. Chem. 24, 803- 809 (2005).
- Z. Fang, Flow Injection Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, p. 14, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995.
- A. Sanz-Medel, Flow Analysis with Atomic Spectrometric Detectors, p. 7, Elsevier Science, Amst erdam,