Direct Formation of H2O2 from H2 and O2

The direct combination of hydrogen and oxygen to form hydrogen peroxide in liquid media with prepared catalysts was carried out in a slurry reactor at atmospheric pressure and room temperature. An O2/H2 ratio of 2:1 with a 50 mL/min flow rate was used in these experiments. Catalyst activity measurements were tested by the iodometric titration method using KMnO4. The results are discussed based on the effects of support material, catalyst preparation method, reaction time, and medium (type of halide and acid) on hydrogen peroxide yield in direct oxidation of hydrogen to produce hydrogen peroxide. Our results showed that the catalytic performance of a gold-based catalyst was greatly dependent upon the kind of support material, precipitation conditions, and liquid media used in the reaction. The highest yield in the study was obtained with a co-precipitated 10.7 wt% Au/CeO2 catalyst in a reaction mixture of 0.25 N H3PO4, 0.1 M NaBr, and absolute ethanol.

Direct Formation of H2O2 from H2 and O2

The direct combination of hydrogen and oxygen to form hydrogen peroxide in liquid media with prepared catalysts was carried out in a slurry reactor at atmospheric pressure and room temperature. An O2/H2 ratio of 2:1 with a 50 mL/min flow rate was used in these experiments. Catalyst activity measurements were tested by the iodometric titration method using KMnO4. The results are discussed based on the effects of support material, catalyst preparation method, reaction time, and medium (type of halide and acid) on hydrogen peroxide yield in direct oxidation of hydrogen to produce hydrogen peroxide. Our results showed that the catalytic performance of a gold-based catalyst was greatly dependent upon the kind of support material, precipitation conditions, and liquid media used in the reaction. The highest yield in the study was obtained with a co-precipitated 10.7 wt% Au/CeO2 catalyst in a reaction mixture of 0.25 N H3PO4, 0.1 M NaBr, and absolute ethanol.

___

  • G. Li, J. Edwards, A.F. Carley and G.J. Hutchings, Catal. Communications 8, 247-250 (2007)
  • V.R. Choudhary and C. Samanta, Catal. Letters 99, 79-81 (2005).
  • J.H. Lunsford, Journal of Catalysis 216, 455-460 (2003).
  • B.E. Solsona, J.K. Edwards, P. Landon, A.F. Carley, A. Herzing, C.J. Kiely and G.J. Hutchings, Chem. Mater. 18, 2689-2695 (2006).
  • R. Burch andP.R. Ellis, App. Catal B: Environmental 42, 203-211 (2003).
  • Melada, S., Rioda, R., Menegazzo, F., Pinna, F. and Strukul, G., Journal of Catalysis 239, 422-430 (2006).
  • S.E. Park, L.H. Huang, C.W. Lee andJ.S. Chang, Catalysis Today 61, 117-122 (2000).
  • R.B. Fischer, “Quantitative Chemical Analysis”, 2nded. W.B. Saunders Company, pp 361-363, 1965.
  • S.J. Lee andA. Gavriilidis, Journal of Catalysis 206, 305 (2002).
  • M. Haruta, S. Tsubota, T. Kobayashi, H. Kageyama, M.J. Genet andB. Delmon, Journal of Catalysis 144, (1993).
  • M. Haruta andM. Date, Appl. Catal. 222, 427 (2001).
  • J. Soria, J.C. Conesa andA.M. Arias, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 158, 67-74 (1999).
  • C. Mihut, C. Descorme, D. Duprez andM.D. Amiridis, Journal of Catalysis 212, 125-135 (2002).
  • C. Samanta andV.R. Choudhary, Catalysis Communications 8, 73-79 (2007).
  • Y.F. Han andJ.H. Lunsford, Journal of Catalysis 230, 313-316 (2005).