Morphological and genetic variation within and among four Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations

Numeric-taxonomical and molecular techniques [nuclear simple sequence repeats (nSSRs), expressed sequence tag (EST) SSRs, and chloroplast SSRs] were used to estimate morphological and genetic differentiation within and among 4 Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations in Turkey. Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and principal component analysis (PCA) showed that 3 out of 15 studied leaf morphological characters (clustered hairs, number of intercalary veins, petiole length) mainly accounted for the discrimination between species. In accordance with earlier observations, the mean genetic differentiation between Q. petraea and Q. robur at 8 microsatellite loci (FST = 0.030) and at chloroplast microsatellites (GST = 0.22) was low, potentially as the result of interspecific gene flow or shared ancestral polymorphisms. Chloroplast microsatellite analyses showed unique chloroplast haplotypes in Turkey, suggesting a glacial refuge in this region. Nuclear microsatellite ssrQrZAG96, described in other studies as being potentially under directional selection (outlier locus) due to high interspecific differentiation, showed considerably lower differentiation between species in the present study (FST = 0.028). These different patterns of genetic variation suggest different local adaptations of the species in this putative glacial refugial area in Turkey. It may also be that this marker is not directly associated with morphological or adaptive species differences. Interestingly, the analysed Q. petraea and Q. robur populations appear to have ecological requirements with regard to water availability that are different than those described for European populations. The analysis of additional populations within the species distribution range in Turkey is necessary to confirm this pattern.

Morphological and genetic variation within and among four Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations

Numeric-taxonomical and molecular techniques [nuclear simple sequence repeats (nSSRs), expressed sequence tag (EST) SSRs, and chloroplast SSRs] were used to estimate morphological and genetic differentiation within and among 4 Quercus petraea and Q. robur natural populations in Turkey. Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and principal component analysis (PCA) showed that 3 out of 15 studied leaf morphological characters (clustered hairs, number of intercalary veins, petiole length) mainly accounted for the discrimination between species. In accordance with earlier observations, the mean genetic differentiation between Q. petraea and Q. robur at 8 microsatellite loci (FST = 0.030) and at chloroplast microsatellites (GST = 0.22) was low, potentially as the result of interspecific gene flow or shared ancestral polymorphisms. Chloroplast microsatellite analyses showed unique chloroplast haplotypes in Turkey, suggesting a glacial refuge in this region. Nuclear microsatellite ssrQrZAG96, described in other studies as being potentially under directional selection (outlier locus) due to high interspecific differentiation, showed considerably lower differentiation between species in the present study (FST = 0.028). These different patterns of genetic variation suggest different local adaptations of the species in this putative glacial refugial area in Turkey. It may also be that this marker is not directly associated with morphological or adaptive species differences. Interestingly, the analysed Q. petraea and Q. robur populations appear to have ecological requirements with regard to water availability that are different than those described for European populations. The analysis of additional populations within the species distribution range in Turkey is necessary to confirm this pattern.

___

  • Aas G (1993). Taxonomical impact of morphological variation in Quercus robur and Q. petraea: a contribution to the hybrid controversy. Annals of Forest Science 50: 107–114.
  • Aas G (1998). Morphologische und Ökologische Variation Mitteleuropäischer Quercus-Arten: ein Beitrag zum Verständnis der Biodiversität. Eching bei München, Germany: IHW-Verlag.
  • Aldrich PR & Cavender-Bares J (2011). Quercus. In: Kole C (ed.) Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources Forest Trees, pp. 89–129. Springer.
  • Alexandersson E, Danielson JA, Råde J, Moparthi VK, Fontes M, Kjellbom P & Johanson U (2010). Transcriptional regulation of aquaporins in accessions of Arabidopsis in response to drought stress. Plant Journal 61: 650–660.
  • Bacilieri R, Ducousso A & Kremer A (1995). Genetic, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. in a mixed stand of northwest of France. Silvae Genetica 44: 1–10.
  • Bakker EG, Van Dam BC, Van Eck HJ & Jacobsen E (2001). A discrimination between Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. based on species-indicative AFLP markers. Forest Genetics 8: 315–322.
  • Bodenes C, Joandet S, Laigret F & Kremer A (1997). Detection of genomic regions differentiating two closely related oak species Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. Heredity 78: 433–444.
  • Borazan A & Babaç MT (2003). Morphometric leaf variation in oaks (Quercus) of Bolu, Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici 40: 233–242.
  • Borovics A (1999). Separability of pedunculate oak and sessile oak aggregate: a contribution to the hybrid and small species estimation. Proceedings of the Forest Research Institute 89: 93–110.
  • Breda N, Cochard H, Dreyer E & Granier A (1993). Field comparison of transpiration, stomatal conductance and vulnerability to cavitation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur under water-stress. Annales des Sciences Forestières 50: 571–582.
  • Coart E, Lamote V & De Loose M (2002). AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species [Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] in Flemish populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 431–439.
  • Curtu AL, Gailing O & Finkeldey R (2007a). Evidence for hybridization and introgression within a species-rich oak (Quercus spp.) community. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 218.
  • Curtu AL, Gailing O, Leinemann L & Finkeldey R (2007b). Genetic variation and differentiation within a natural community of five oak species (Quercus spp.). Plant Biology 9: 116–126.
  • Deguilloux MF, Dumolin-Lapegue S, Gielly L, Grivet D & Petit RJ (2003). A set of primers for the amplification of chloroplast microsatellites in Quercus. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 24–27.
  • Dupouey JL & Badeau V (1993). Morphological variability of oaks (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. pubescens Willd) in northeastern France: preliminary results. Annals of Forest Science 50: 35–40.
  • Durand J, Bodenes C, Chancerel E, Frigerio JM, Vendramin G, Sebastiani F, Buonamici A, Gailing O, Koelewijn HP, Villani F, Mattioni C, Cherubini M, Goicoechea PG, Herrán A, Ikaran Z, Cabané C, Ueno S, Alberto F, Dumoulin PY, Guichoux E, Daruvar A, Kremer A & Plomion C (2010). A fast and costeffective approach to develop and map EST-SSR markers: oak as a case study. BMC Genomics 11: 570–582.
  • Erinç S (1965). Yağış Müesseriyeti Üzerine bir Deneme ve Yeni bir İndis. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi, Coğrafya Enstitüsü, Yayın No. 41 (in Turkish).
  • Finkeldey R (2001). Genetic variation of oaks (Quercus spp.) in Switzerland. 1. Allelic diversity and differentiation at isozyme gene loci. Forest Genetics 8: 185–195.
  • Gailing O, Wachter H, Heyder J, Schmitt HP & Finkeldey R (2007). Chloroplast DNA analysis in oak stands (Quercus robur L.) in North Rhine-Westphalia with presumably Slavonian origin: is there an association between geographic origin and bud phenology? Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 81: 165–171.
  • Gailing O, Vornam B, Leinemann LL & Finkeldey R (2009). Genetic and genomic approaches to assess adaptive genetic variation in plants: forest trees as a model. Physiologia Plantarum 137: 509–519.
  • Gömöry D (2000). Gene coding for a non-specific NAD dependent dehydrogenase shows a strong differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea. Forest Genetics 7: 167–170.
  • Guo S & Thompson E (1992). Performing the exact test of HardyWeinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48: 361– 3
  • Iestwaart JH & Feij AE (1989). A multivariate analysis of introgression between Q. robur and Q. petraea in the Netherlands. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 38: 313–325.
  • Kampfer S, Lexer C, Glössl J & Steinkellner H (1998). Characterization of (GA) n microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas 129: 183–186.
  • Kremer A, Dupouey JL, Deans JD, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, Finkeldey R, Espinel S, Jensen J, Kleinschmit J, Van Damj B, Ducousso A, Forrest I, Heredia UL, Lowe AJ, Tutkova M, Munro RC, Steinhoff S & Badeau V (2002). Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Annals of Forest Science 59: 777–787.
  • Lexer C, Kremer A & Petit RJ (2006). Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism. Molecular Ecology 15: 2007–2012.
  • Mariette S, Cottrell J, Csaikl UM, Goikoechea P, König A, Lowe AJ, Van Dam BC, Barreneche T, Bodénès C, Streiff R, Burg K, Groppe K, Munro RC, Tabbener H & Kremer A (2002). Comparison of levels of genetic diversity detected with AFLP and microsatellite markers within and among mixed Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L. stands. Silvae Genetica 51: 72–79.
  • McShea WJ, Healy WM, Devers P, Fearer T, Koch FH, Stauffer D & Waldon J (2007). Forestry matters: decline of oaks will impact wildlife in hardwood forests. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 1717–1728.
  • Muir G & Schlötterer C (2005). Evidence for shared ancestral polymorphism rather than recurrent gene flow at microsatellite loci differentiating two hybridizing oaks (Quercus spp.). Molecular Ecology 14: 549–561.
  • Müller-Starck G, Zanetto A, Kremer A & Herzog S (1996). Inheritance of isoenzymes in sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and offspring from interspecific crosses. Forest Genetics 3: 1–12. Nei M (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Neophytou C, Aravanopoulos FA, Fink S & Dounavi A (2010). Detecting interspecific and geographic differentiation patterns in two interfertile oak species (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L.) using small sets of microsatellite markers. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 2026–2035.
  • OGM (2006). Orman Varlığımız. Ankara, Türkiye: TC Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, OGM Orman İdaresi ve Planlama Dairesi Başkanlığı Yayınları (in Turkish).
  • Oran S & Öztürk S (2012). Epiphytic lichen diversity on Quercus cerris and Q. frainetto in the Marmara region (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Botany 36: 175–190.
  • Peakall R & Smouse P (2006). GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295.
  • Petit R, El Mousadik A & Pons O (1998). Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conservation Biology 12: 844–855.
  • Petit R, Brewer S, Bordács S, Burg K, Cheddadi R, Coart E, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, van Dam B, Deans D, Espinel S, Fineschi S, Finkeldey R, Glaz I, Goicoechea PG, Jensen JS, König AO, Lowe AJ, Madsen SF, Mátyás G, Munro RC, Popescu F, Slade D, Tabbener H, de Vries SGM, Ziegenhagen B, de Beaulieu JL & Kremer A (2002). Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonisation routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. Forest Ecology and Management 156: 49–
  • Petit RJ, Aguinagalde I, de Beaulieu JL, Bittkau C, Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Ennos R, Fineschi S, Grivet D, Lascoux M, Mohanty A, Müller-Starck G, Demesure-Musch B, Palmé A, Martín JP, Rendell S & Vendramin GG (2003). Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300: 1563–1565.
  • Ponton S, Dupouey JL & Dreyer E (2004). Leaf morphology as species indicator in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. modulation by irradiance and growth flush. Annals of Forest Science 61: 73–80.
  • Raymond M & Rousset F (1995). Genepop (version 1.2): populationgenetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249.
  • Rizhsky L, Liang HJ, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Dayletova S & Mittler R (2004). When defense pathways collide: the response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiology 134: 1683–1696.
  • Saintagne C, Bodenes C, Barreneche T, Pot D, Plomion C & Kremer A (2004). Distribution of genomic regions differentiating oak species assessed by QTL detection. Heredity 92: 20–30.
  • Scotti-Saintagne C, Mariette S, Porth I, Goicoechea PG, Barreneche T, Bodenes C, Burg K & Kremer A (2004). Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species (Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea [Matt.] Liebl.). Genetics 168: 1615–1626.
  • SPSS Inc. (2002). SPSS 11.0 Guide to Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Public.
  • Steinkellner H, Fluch S, Turetschek E, Lexer C, Streiff R, Kremer A, Burg K & Glössl J (1997). Identification and characterization of (GA/CT) n - microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Molecular Biology 33: 1093–1096.
  • Sullivan A, Lind J, McCleary TS, Romero-Severson J & Gailing O (2013). Development and characterization of genomic and gene-based microsatellite markers in North American red oak species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 31: 231–239.
  • Teshome A, Baum BR, Fahrig L, Torrance JK, Arnason TJ & Lambert JD (1997). Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] landrace variation and classification in North Shewa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Euphytica 97: 255–263.
  • Ugurlu E, Rolecek J & Bergmeier E (2012). Oak woodland vegetation of Turkey—a first overview based on multivariate statistics. Applied Vegetation Science 15: 590–608.
  • Van Valen L (1976). Ecological species, multispecies and oaks. Taxon 25: 233–239.
  • Vornam B, Gailing O, Derory J, Plomion C, Kremer A & Finkeldey R (2011). Characterization and natural variation of a dehydrin gene in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Plant Biology 13: 881– 8
  • Yaltırık F (1984). Türkiye Meşeleri Teşhis Kılavuzu. İstanbul: Yenilik Basımevi (in Turkish).
  • Zanetto A, Kremer A, Müller-Starck G & Hattemer HH (1996). Inheritance of isozymes in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.). Journal of Heredity 87: 364–370.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Sexual phenotype of Capparis herbacea (Capparaceae)

Nana SHAKARISHVILI, Liana OSISHVILI

Influence of salicylic acid on phytochelatin synthesis in Zea mays during Cd stress

Gabriella SZALAI, Alexander KRANTEV, Rusina YORDANOVA, Losanka Petrova POPOVA, Tibor JANDA

Seasonal variation of litter accumulation and putrefaction with reference to decomposers in a mangrove forest in Karachi, Pakistan

Kanwal NAZIM, Moinuddin AHMED, Syed Shahid SHAUKAT, Muhammad Uzair KHAN

Physioanatomical adaptations in response to salt stress in Sporobolus arabicus (Poaceae) from the Salt Range, Pakistan

Mansoor HAMEED, Tahira NAWAZ, Muhammad ASHRAF, Nargis NAZ

New staining technique for fungal-infected plant tissues

João Paulo Rodrigues MARQUES, Marli Kasue Misaki SOARES, Beatriz APPEZZATO-DA-GLORIA

RAPD and ISSR analysis of some economically important species, varieties, and cultivars of the genus Allium (Alliaceae)

Ashutosh MUKHERJEE, Biswanath SIKDAR, Biplab GHOSH, Anuradha BANERJEE, Enakshi GHOSH, Moimee BHATTACHARYA, Satyesh Chandra ROY

The identity of Magnolia odoratissima (Magnoliaceae) from China

Shugang CHEN, Qingwen ZENG

Seed-coat microsculpturing of Turkish Lepidium (Brassicaceae) and its systematic application

Mehmet BONA

The phylogeny of Heterocapsa sp. (Dinophyceae) isolated from the south coast of Iran during a Cochlodinium polykrikoides bloom

Gilan ATTARAN-FARIMAN, Pegah JAVID

The comparison of Grime’s strategies of plant taxa in Hacı Osman Forest and Bafra Fish Lakes in the central Black Sea region of Turkey

Rena HÜSEYİNOVA, Mahmut KILINÇ, Hamdi Güray KUTBAY, Dudu Duygu KILIÇ, Ali BİLGİN