___

• Alvarez AE, van de Wiel CCM, Smulders MJM, Vosman B (2001). Use of microsatellites to evaluate genetic diversity and species relationships in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 103: 1283–1292.
• Arrillaga I, Gisbert C, Sales E, Roig L, Moreno V (2001). In vitro plant regeneration and gene transfer on the wild tomato Lycopersicon chesmanii. J Hortic Sci Biotech 76: 413–418.
• Bhatia P, Ashwath N, Senaratna T, David M (2004). Tissue culture studies of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Cell Tiss Org 78: 1–21.
• Bedinger PA, Chetelat R, McClure B, Moyle LC, Rose JKC, Stack S, van der Knaap E, Baek Y, Lopez-Casado G, Covey PA et al. (2011). Interspecific reproductive barriers in the tomato clade: opportunities to decipher mechanisms of reproductive isolation. Sex Plant Reprod 24: 171–187.
• Cap GB, Roberts PA, Thomason IJ, Murashige T (1991). Embryo culture of Lycopersicon esculentum × L. peruvianum hybrid genotypes possessing heat-stable resistance to Meloidogyne incognita. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 116: 1082–1088.
• Chaerani R, Smulders MJ, van der Linden CG, Vosman B, Stam P, Voorrips RE (2007). QTL identification for early blight resistance (Alternaria solani) in a Solanum lycopersicum × S. arcanum cross. Theor Appl Genet 114: 439–450.
• Chen LZ, Adachi T (1998). Protoplast fusion between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum-complex: somatic embryogenesis, plant regeneration and morphology. Plant Cell Rep 17: 508–514.
• Devi R, Dhaliwal MS, Kaur A, Gosal SS (2008). Effect of growth regulators on in vitro morphogenic response of tomato. Indian J Biotechnol 7: 526–530.
• Faria RT, Destro D, Bespalhok JC, Illg RD (2002). Introgression of in vitro regeneration capability of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium Mill. into recalcitrant tomato cultivars. Euphytica 124: 59–63.
• Foolad MR, Merk HL, Ashrafi H (2007). Genetics, genomics and breeding of late blight disease and early blight disease in tomato. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27: 75–107.
• Gisbert C, Arrillaga I, Roig LA, Moreno V (1999). Acquisition of a collection of Lycopersicon pennellii (Corr. D’Arcy) transgenic plants with uidA and nptII marker genes. J Hortic Sci Biotech 74: 105–109.
• Jablonska B, Ammiraju JSS, Bhattarai K, Mantelin S, Martinez de Ilarduya O, Roberts PA, Kaloshian I (2007). The Mi- 9 Gene from Solanum arcanum conferring heat-stable resistance to root-knot nematodes is a homolog of Mi- 1. Plant Physiol 143: 1044–1054.
• Jiang W, Barshan Özaktaş B, Mantri N, Tao Z, Lu H (2013). Classification of Camellia species from 3 sections using leaf anatomical data with back-propagation neural networks and support vector machines. Turk J Bot 37: 1093–1103.
• Khoudi H, Nouri-Khemakhem A, Gouiaa S, Masmoudi K (2009). Optimization of regeneration and transformation parameters in tomato and improvement of its salinity and drought tolerance. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 6068–6076.
• Kochevenko A, Ratushnyak Y, Korneyeyev D, Stasik O, Porublyova L, Kochubey S, Suprunova T, Gleba Y (2000). Functional cybrid plants of Lycopersicon peruvianum var ‘dentatum’ with chloroplasts of Lycopersicon esculentum. Plant Cell Rep 19: 588– 5
• Koornneef M, Hanhart CJ, Martinelli L (1987). A genetic analysis of cell culture traits in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 74: 633–641.
• Koornneef M, Bade J, Hanhart C, Horsman K, Schel J, Soppe W, Vekerk R, Zabel P (1993). Characterization and mapping of a gene controlling shoot regeneration in tomato. Plant J 3: 131–141.
• Kumar V, Kodandaramaiah J, Vati Rajan M (2012). Anatomical traits in relation to physiological characteristics in mulberry (Morus sp.) cultivars. Turk J Bot 36: 683–689.
• Kut SA, Evans DA (1982). Plant regeneration from cultured leaf explants of eight wild tomato species and two related Solanum species. In Vitro Cell Dev B 8: 593–598.
• Marchionni BE, Pratta GR, Zorzoli R (2007). Genetic analysis of the in vitro culture response in tomato. Plant Cell Tiss Organ 88: 233–239.
• Miller JC, Tanksley SD (1990). RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80: 437–448.
• Murashige T, Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum 15: 473–497.
• Parker-Norton J, Boll WG (1954). Callus and shoot formation from tomato roots in vitro. Science 119: 220–221.
• Peralta IE, Knapp S, Spooner DM (2005). New species of wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon: Solanaceae) from Northern Peru. Syst Bot 30: 424–434.
• Peralta IE, Spooner DM, Knapp S (2008). Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sections Lycopersicoides, Juglandifolia, Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Syst Bot M 84: 1–186.
• Pereira-Carvalho RC, Boiteux LS, Fonseca MEN, Díaz-Pendón JA, Moriones E, Fernández-Muñoz R, Charchar JM, Resende RO (2010). Multiple resistance to Meloidogyne spp. and to bipartite and monopartite Begomovirus spp. in wild Solanum (Lycopersicon) accessions. Plant Dis 94: 179–185.
• Peres LEP, Morgante PG, Vecchi C, Kraus JE, Sluys MA (2001). Shoot regeneration capacity from roots and transgenic hairy roots of tomato cultivars and wild related species. Plant Cell Tiss Org 65: 37–44.
• Pratta G, Zorzoli R, Picardi LA (1997). Intra and interspecific variability of in vitro culture response in Lycopersicon tomatoes. Braz J Genet 20: 75–78.
• Ruf S, Hermann M, Berfr IJ, Carrer H, Bock R (2001). Stable genetic transformation of tomato plastids and expression of foreign protein in fruit. Nature Biotechnol 19: 870–875.
• Sacks EJ, Gerhardt LM, Gtaham EB, Jacobs J, Thorrup TA, Clair DA (1997). Variation among 41 genotypes of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) for crossability to L. peruvianum (L.) Mill. Ann Bot-London 80: 469–477.
• Satoh H, Takashina T, Escalante A, Egashira H, Imanishi S (2000). Molecular markers mapped around the high shoot regeneration capacity gene Rg-2 in Lycopersicon chilense. Breeding Sci 50: 251–256.
• Segeren MI, Sondahl MR, Siqueira WJ, Medina Filho HP, Nagai H, Lourencao AI (1993). Tomato breeding: 1. Embryo rescue of interspecific hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and L. peruvianum Mill. Braz J Genet 16: 367–380.
• Shani E, Ben-Gera H, Shleizer-Burko S, Burko Y, Weiss D, Ori N (2010). Cytokinin regulates compound leaf development in tomato. Plant Cell 22: 3206–3217.
• Smith PG (1944). Embryo culture of a tomato species hybrid. P Am Soc Hortic Sci 44: 413–416.
• Spooner DM, Peralta IE, Knapp S (2005). Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.]. Taxon 54: 43–
• Steinitz B, Amitay A, Gaba V, Tabib Y, Keller M, Levin I (2006). A simple plant regeneration ability assay in a range of Lycopersicon species. Plant Cell Tiss Org 84: 269–278.
• Stommel JR, Sinden SL (1991). Genotypic differences in shoot forming capacity of cultured leaf explants of Lycopersicon hirsutum. HortScience 26: 1317–1320.
• Takashina T, Suzuki T, Egashira H, Imanishi S (1998). New molecular markers linked with the high shoot regeneration capacity of the wild tomato species Lycopersicon chilense. Breeding Sci 48: 109–113.
• Thomas BR, Pratt D (1981). Efficient hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum via embryo cells. Theor Appl Genet 59: 215–219.
• Trujillo-Moya C, Gisbert C, Vilanova S, Nuez F (2011). Localization of QTLs for in vitro plant regeneration in tomato. BMC Plant Biol 11: 140.
• Trujillo-Moya C, Gisbert C (2012). The influence of ethylene and ethylene modulators on shoot organogenesis in tomato. Plant Cell Tiss Org 111: 41–48.
• Zuriaga E, Blanca J, Nuez F (2009). Classification and phylogenetic relationships in Solanum section Lycopersicon based on AFLP and two nuclear gene sequences. Genet Resour Crop Ev 56: 663–678.