Differentiation of some myxomycetes species by ITS sequences

Seven different PCR primers targeting 18 different myxomycetes genera were designed and ribosomal DNA ITS1-5.8SrDNA-ITS2 regions of 52 morphologically characterized species from Turkey were amplified and sequenced. The studied species belong to the genera Arcyria, Badhamia, Ceratiomyxa, Collaria, Comatricha, Cribraria, Diachea, Diderma, Didymium, Enerthenema, Lamproderma, Lycogala, Perichaena, Physarum, Reticularia, Stemonitis, Stemonitopsis, and Trichia. Significant ITS region size and sequence variations were observed among the analyzed species. The ITS based phylogenetic tree did not reflect evolutionary relationships at genus or higher level. The only exception was the genus Didymium, which formed a clearly distinctive cluster in the phylogenetic tree containing 18 different genera. It was concluded that interspecies variation of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region is high enough to differentiate species, but this region did not reflect the evolutionary relationships between the myxomycetes species. Hence, we suggested that sequencing of the ITS region could only be used as a supporting tool for the phenotypic identification, not for revealing the evolutionary relationships between the myxomycetes species.

Differentiation of some myxomycetes species by ITS sequences

Seven different PCR primers targeting 18 different myxomycetes genera were designed and ribosomal DNA ITS1-5.8SrDNA-ITS2 regions of 52 morphologically characterized species from Turkey were amplified and sequenced. The studied species belong to the genera Arcyria, Badhamia, Ceratiomyxa, Collaria, Comatricha, Cribraria, Diachea, Diderma, Didymium, Enerthenema, Lamproderma, Lycogala, Perichaena, Physarum, Reticularia, Stemonitis, Stemonitopsis, and Trichia. Significant ITS region size and sequence variations were observed among the analyzed species. The ITS based phylogenetic tree did not reflect evolutionary relationships at genus or higher level. The only exception was the genus Didymium, which formed a clearly distinctive cluster in the phylogenetic tree containing 18 different genera. It was concluded that interspecies variation of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region is high enough to differentiate species, but this region did not reflect the evolutionary relationships between the myxomycetes species. Hence, we suggested that sequencing of the ITS region could only be used as a supporting tool for the phenotypic identification, not for revealing the evolutionary relationships between the myxomycetes species.

___

  • Avise JC (2001). Phylogeography. The History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Univ Press.
  • Baldauf SL (1999). A search for the origins of animals and fungi: comparing and combining molecular data. Am Nat 154: 178– 188.
  • Cavalier-Smith T (1993). Kingdom Protozoa and its 18 Phyla. Microbiol Rev. 57: 953–994.
  • Clark J (2004). Reproductive systems and taxonomy in the myxomycetes. Syst Geogr Pl 74: 209–216.
  • Dorak MT (Ed.) (2007). Real-time PCR. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis Farr ML (1976). Myxomycetes Flora Neotropica. In Monograph 16: 1–305.
  • Ing B (1999). The Myxomycetes of Britain and Ireland, An Identification Handbook. Slough, UK: The Richmond Publishing Press, p. 374.
  • Lado C (2014). An Online Nomenclatural Information System of Eumycetozoa. http://www.nomen.eumycetozoa.com. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid. Last updated 3 September 2014.
  • Martin GW, Alexopoulos CJ (1969). The Myxomycetes. Iowa City, IA, USA: University of Iowa Press.
  • Martín MP, Lado C, Johansen S (2003). Primers are designed for amplification and direct sequencing of ITS region of rDNA from Myxomycetes. Mycologia, 95: 474-479.
  • Neubert H, Nowotny W, Baumann K (1993). Die Myxomyceten Vol. 1. Ceratiomyxales, Echinosteliales, Liceales und Trichiales. Gomaringen, Germany: Karlheinz Baumann Verlag, p. 335 (in German).
  • Neubert H, Nowotny W, Baumann K (1995). Die Myxomyceten Vol. 2. Physarales. Gomaringen, Germany: Karlheinz Baumann Verlag, p. 368 (in German).
  • Neubert H, Nowotny W, Baumann K (2000). Die Myxomyceten Vol. 3. Stemonitales. Gomaringen, Germany: Karlheinz Baumann Verlag, p. 375 (in German).
  • Novozhilov YK, Schnittler M, Erastova DA, Okun MV, Schepin ON, Heinrich E (2013). Diversity of nivicolous myxomycetes of the Teberda State Biosphere Reserve (Northwestern Caucasus, Russia). Fungal Diversity 59: 109–130.
  • Stephenson SL (2000). Myxomycetes of New Zealand. Hong Kong: Fungal Diversity Press.
  • Stephenson SL, Schnittler M, Novozhilov YK (2008). Myxomycete diversity and distribution from the fossil record to the present. Biodivers Conserv 17: 285–301.
  • Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A, Thomas RH, Vogler AP (2003). A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 70–74.
  • Walther T, Mtimet N, Alkım C, Vax A, Loret MO, Ullah A, Gancedo C, Smits GJ, François JM (2013). Metabolic phenotypes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants with altered trehalose 6-phosphate dynamics. Biochem J 454: 227–237.
  • Winsett KE, Stephenson SL (2008). Using ITS sequences to assess intraspecific genetic relationships among geographically separated collections of the myxomycete Didymium squamulosum. Rev Mex Micol 27: 59–65.
  • Winsett KE, Stephenson SL (2011). Global distribution and molecular diversity of Didymium difforme. Mycosphere 2: 135–146.
  • Woese CR, Fox GE (1977). Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. P Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 5088–5090.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK