Comparative studies of six populations of Isoetes panchganiensis from India

Six populations of Isoetes panchganiensis G.K.Srivast., D.D.Pant & P.K.Shukla growing in different environmental conditions of the Western Ghats have been studied to determine the range of variation within the species. The present investigation does not show any variation in habitat (aquatic), rhizomorph (trilobed), velum (fenestra), and presence or absence of peripheral strands; however, there is a subtle variation in the length of plants, number of leaves, size of megasporangia, and size and ornamentation of the megaspores. The basic organisation of the megaspores of all the populations is almost same, but the finer details of the ornamentation of the megaspores exhibit subtle differences. They may be retate to reticulate. The muri may be complete or incomplete. Megaspores of the Kolahapur population are the largest in diameter, whereas the megaspores of the Khinger population are the smallest in diameter.

Comparative studies of six populations of Isoetes panchganiensis from India

Six populations of Isoetes panchganiensis G.K.Srivast., D.D.Pant & P.K.Shukla growing in different environmental conditions of the Western Ghats have been studied to determine the range of variation within the species. The present investigation does not show any variation in habitat (aquatic), rhizomorph (trilobed), velum (fenestra), and presence or absence of peripheral strands; however, there is a subtle variation in the length of plants, number of leaves, size of megasporangia, and size and ornamentation of the megaspores. The basic organisation of the megaspores of all the populations is almost same, but the finer details of the ornamentation of the megaspores exhibit subtle differences. They may be retate to reticulate. The muri may be complete or incomplete. Megaspores of the Kolahapur population are the largest in diameter, whereas the megaspores of the Khinger population are the smallest in diameter.

___

  • Bagella S, Caria MC, Molins A & Rossello JA (2011). Different spore structures in sympatric Isoetes histrix populations and their relationship with gross morphology, chromosome number, and ribosomal nuclear ITS sequences. Flora 206: 451–457.
  • Bolin JI, Bary RD, Keskin M & Musselman LJ (2008). The genus Isoetes L. (Isoetaceae, Lycophyta) in South-Western Asia. Turkish Journal of Botany 32: 447–457.
  • Gena CB & Bhardwaja TN (1984). Three new species of genus Isoetes L. from Rajasthan, India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 81: 165–168.
  • Hickey RJ (1986). Isoetes megaspore surface morphology nomenclature variation and systematic importance. American Fern Journal 76: 1–16.
  • Jackson BD (1928). A Glossary of Botanic Terms with their Derivation and Accent. Philadelphia: JB Company.
  • Kremp GOW (1965). Morphology Encyclopedia. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  • Lellinger DB & Taylor WC (1997). A classification of spore ornamentation in the Pteridophyta. In: Johns RJ (ed.) Holttum Memorial Volume, pp. 33–42. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
  • Mahabale TS (1938). On a new species of Isoetes in India. Current Science 7: 62–63.
  • Melia N, Gabedava L, Barblishvili T & Jgenti L (2012). Reproductive biology studies towards the conservation of two rare species of Colchic flora, Arbutus andrachne and Osmanthus decorus. Turkish Journal Botany 36: 55–62.
  • Pfeiffer NE (1922). Monograph of the Isoetaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 9: 79–232.
  • Rao LN (1944). A new species of Isoetes from Bangalore, Mysore State. Current Science 13: 286–287.
  • Shende DV (1945). A new species of Isoetes from the Bombay Presidency. Journal of University Bombay B14: 50–52.
  • Shukla PK, Srivastava GK & Shukla SK (2002). The quillworts (Isoetes) of India: distribution, endemism and species radiation. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 959–973.
  • Shukla PK, Srivastava GK, Shukla SK & Singh SK (2007). Cyto- morphology based basal and sub-basal level evolutionary relationship among Isoetes L. species with special reference to Indian taxa. Proceeding National Academy Science India B 77: 88–104.
  • Srivastava GK (1998). Isoetaceae in India: Morphology and taxonomy. Indian Fern Journal 15: 165–177.
  • Srivastava GK (2005). Systematics, biogeography and diversification of Indian quillworts (Isoetes L.). Journal of Indian Botanical Society 84: 1–11.
  • Srivastava GK, Pant DD & Shukla PK (1993). The genus Isoetes L. in India. American Fern Journal 83: 105–119.
  • Srivastava GK, Shukla PK, Wagai SO & Srivastava M (1996). In situ germination of megaspores of some Indian species of Isoetes L. National Academy Science Letters 19: 191–194.
  • Srivastava GK & Srivastava M (2001). Edaphic diversity growth of some Indian Isoetes L. species. Taiwania 46: 145–157.
  • Srivastava GK, Srivastava M & Wagai SO (2001). Quillworts of Sahyadris Hills (India). Indian Fern Journal 18: 89–101.
  • Takamiya M (1999). Natural history and taxonomy of Isoetes (Isoetaceae). Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 50: 101– 138.
  • Wagai SO, Srivastava GK, Shukla PK & Shukla SK (2008). Megaspores of Isoetes dixitei Shende: population diversity and its evolution. In: Verma SC, Khullar SP & Cheema HK (eds.) Perspectives in Pteridophytes, pp. 171–181. Dehradun, India: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.
Turkish Journal of Botany-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-008X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK