Challenges of In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives

Crop wild relatives (CWRs) will gain in importance as changing climates put both traditional and advanced cultivars under increasing stress, leading to a need for plant breeding to produce new varieties able to grow under the new climate regimes. Traditionally, the approach to the conservation of CWRs has been ex situ - the collection and maintenance of seed accessions in national, regional, and international germplasm banks, supplemented by field genebanks for species with recalcitrant seeds. More recently the need to maintain CWRs in their natural habitats (in situ) has been advocated. This is very different from on-farm conservation of traditional land races and is a complex multidisciplinary process. Particular problems that have to be addressed include the adoption of a workable definition of what is a CWR, application of priority-determining mechanisms because of the large number of candidate species of CWRs, assessment of the effectiveness of conservation approaches, the relative costs of in situ and ex situ approaches, integration of CWR in situ conservation into national programmes, and the challenges posed by global change. CWRs may be conserved in both protected and non-protected areas. Presence in the former is no guarantee of their survival and in most cases some degree of management intervention is required. Experience derived from recent EU- and GEF-funded CWR conservation initiatives will be drawn upon.

Challenges of In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives

Crop wild relatives (CWRs) will gain in importance as changing climates put both traditional and advanced cultivars under increasing stress, leading to a need for plant breeding to produce new varieties able to grow under the new climate regimes. Traditionally, the approach to the conservation of CWRs has been ex situ - the collection and maintenance of seed accessions in national, regional, and international germplasm banks, supplemented by field genebanks for species with recalcitrant seeds. More recently the need to maintain CWRs in their natural habitats (in situ) has been advocated. This is very different from on-farm conservation of traditional land races and is a complex multidisciplinary process. Particular problems that have to be addressed include the adoption of a workable definition of what is a CWR, application of priority-determining mechanisms because of the large number of candidate species of CWRs, assessment of the effectiveness of conservation approaches, the relative costs of in situ and ex situ approaches, integration of CWR in situ conservation into national programmes, and the challenges posed by global change. CWRs may be conserved in both protected and non-protected areas. Presence in the former is no guarantee of their survival and in most cases some degree of management intervention is required. Experience derived from recent EU- and GEF-funded CWR conservation initiatives will be drawn upon.

___

  • Agee JK (2002) The Fallacy of Passive Management. Conservation in Practice 3: 18-25.
  • Ahmed Amri, Valkoun J & Ali Shehadeh (2002). Promoting in situ conservation of agrobiodiversity in West Asia. ICARDA Caravan 17: 31-33.
  • Anikster Y, Feldman M & Horovitz A (1997) The Ammiad experiment. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd, BV, Hawkes, JG (eds), Plant Genetic Conservation: the In Situ Approach. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 239-253.
  • Bennett E (1971). The origin and importance of agroecotypes in south- west Asia. In: Davis PH, Harper PC and Hedge IC. (eds), Plant Life of South-West Asia, pp. 219-234. Botanical Society of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
  • Brown AHD & Brubaker CL (2002). Indicators for sustainable management of plant genetic resources – How well are we doing. In: Engels J, Brown AHD, Jackson MT & Ramanatha Rao V (eds), Science and Technology for Managing Plant Genetic Diversity. CAB International Publishing, Wallingford, pp. 249-262.
  • Damania AB (1994). In situ Conservation of Biodiversity of Wild Progenitors of Cereal Crops in the Near East. Biodiversity Letters 2: 56-60.
  • Damania AB (1998). Domestication of Cereal Crop Plants and In situ Conservation of their Genetic Resources in the Fertile Crescent. In: Damania AB, Valkoun J, Willcox G, Qualset CO (eds),The Origins of Agriculture and Crop Domestication. ICARDA, Aleppo.
  • Damania AB, Valkoun J, Willcox G & Qualset CO (eds) (1998). The Origins of Agriculture and Crop Domestication. ICARDA, Aleppo.
  • Firat AE & Tan A (1997). In situ conservation of genetic diversity in Turkey. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV & Hawkes JG (eds), Plant Genetic Conservation: the in situ approach. pp. 254-262. Chapman & Hall, London & New York
  • Franks JR (1999). In situ conservation of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: a UK perspective. Land Use Policy 16: 81- 91.
  • Gabrielian E & Zohary D (2004). Wild relatives of food crops native to Armenia and Nakhichevan. Flora Mediterranea 14:5-80.
  • Hajjar R & Hodgkin T (2007). The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156: 1-13.
  • Harlan JR & de Wet JMJ (1971). Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20: 509-517.
  • Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Araşjo MB, Virkkala R, Thuiller W & Sykes M. (2006). Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 751-777.
  • Heywood VH (1993). Broadening the basis of plant genetic resource conservation. In: Gustafson JP, Appels R & Raven P (eds), Gene Conservation and Exploration, 1-13. 20th Stadler Genetics Symposium. Plenum Press, New York and London.
  • Heywood V, Casas A, Ford-Lloyd B, Kell S & Maxted N (2007). Conservation and sustainable use of crop wild relatives. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121: 245-255.
  • Heywood VH & Dulloo ME (2006) [2005]. In situ conservation of wild plant species–a critical global review of good practices. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 11, IPGRI, Rome.
  • Holden J, Peacock J & Williams T (1993). Genes, Crops and the Environment Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Hoyt E (1988). Conserving the Wild Relatives of Crops. IBPGR, IUCN,WWF, Rome and Gland.
  • IPPC (2007). Climate Change 2007 - The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC; Climate Change 2007 - Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC; Climate Change 2007 - Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press.
  • Jarvis A, Lane A & Hijmans RJ (2007). Crop Wild Relatives and Climate Change: predicting the loss of important genetic resources Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment (in press)
  • Kaya Z, Kun E & Guner A (1997). National Plan for in situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Diversity in Turkey. Ministry of Environment, Ankara.
  • Kaya Z & Raynal DJ (2000). Biodiversity and conservation of Turkish forests. Biological Conservation 97: 131-141.
  • Kell, SP, Scholten M, Maxted N, Moore J, Iriondo J, Asdal A, Frese L, Labokas J & Steno Z (2005). The PGR Forum Crop Wild Relative Information System (CWRIS): Information Management for Crop Wild Relatives Illustrated with Case Studies. Crop Wild Relative Case Study 5. University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
  • Kell SP, Knüpffer H, Jury SL, Ford-Lloyd BV & Maxted N (2008). Crops and wild relatives of the Euro-Mediterranean region: making and using a conservation catalogue. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Kell SP, Iriondo J, Dulloo E & Turok J (eds) Crop Wild Relative Conservation and Use. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp. 69-109.
  • Lane A (2007). Climate Change Threatens Wild Relatives Of Key Crops.
  • Lane A, Jarvis A & Hijmans R (2006). Climate change threatens wild relatives with extinction. Geneflow ‘06 p. 18.
  • Lleras E (1991). Conservation of genetic resources in situ. Diversity 7: 72-74.
  • McCarthy JJ, Canziani O, Leary NA, Dokken D & White S (eds) (2001). Climate change 2001. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Martínez-Meyer E (2005). Climate change and biodiversity: some considerations in forecasting shifts in species’ potential distributions. Biodiversity Informatics 2: 42-55.
  • Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV & Hawkes JG (eds) (1997). Plant Genetic Conservation: The In Situ Approach. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jury SL, Kell SP & Scholten MA (2006). Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. Biodiversity Conseration 15: 2673-2685.
  • Magos Brehm J, Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV & Martins-Loução MA (2007). National inventories of crop wild relatives and wild harvested plants: case-study for Portugal. Genetic Resources & Crop Evolution http://www.springerlink.com/content/a56v59k4q 5632324/
  • Maxted N, Scholten MA, Codd R & Ford-Lloyd BV (2007). Creation and use of a national inventory of crop wild relatives. Biological Conservation 140: 142-159.
  • Meilleur BA & Hodgkin T (2004). In situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and trends. Biodiversity Conservation 13: 663- 684.
  • Pearson RG & Dawson TP 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Correspondences. Biogeography 13: 469-476. Global Ecology and
  • Poore MED (1971). Conservation of vegetation, flora and fauna as part of land use policy. In: Davis PH, Harper PC and Hedge IC. (eds), Plant Life of South-West Asia, pp. 297-306. Botanical Society of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
  • Putz FE, Redford KH, Robinson JG, Fimbel R & Blate G (2000). Biodiversity Conservation in the Context of Tropical Forest Management. The World Bank Environment Department, Biodiversity Series–Impact Studies Paper 75. The World Bank, Washington DC, USA.
  • Rubenstein KD, Heisey JP, Shoemaker R, Sullivan J & Frisvold G (2005). Crop Genetic Resources: An Economic Appraisal. Economic Information Bulletin Number 2. USDA, Washington DC.
  • Rubenstein KD, Smale M & Widrlechner MP (2006). Demand for Genetic Resources and the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System. Crop Science 46: 1021-1031.
  • Safriel UN, Anikster Y & Valdman M (1997). Management of nature reserves for conservation of wild relatives and the significance of marginal populations, In: Valdes B, Heywood VH, Raimondo FM & Zohary D (eds), Conservation of the Wild Relatives of European Cultivated Plants. Bocconea 7: 233-239.
  • Sattout EJ, Talhouk SN & Caligari PDS (2007a). Economic value of cedar relics in Lebanon: An application of contingent valuation method for conservation. Ecological Economics 61: 315-322.
  • Sattout EJ, Talhouk SN & Caligari PDS (2007b). Perspectives for sustainable management of cedar forests in Lebanon: situation analysis and guidelines. Environment, Development and Sustainability 10.1007/s10668-006-9041-8
  • SEG (2007). Scientific Expert Group on Climate Change. Confronting Climate Change: Avoiding the Unmanageable and Managing the Unavoidable [Rosina M Bierbaum, John P Holdren, Michael C MacCracken, Richard H Moss, and Peter H Raven (eds.)]. Report prepared for the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development. Sigma Xi, Research Triangle Park, NC, and the United Nations Foundation, Washington, DC,
  • Slater R, Peskett L, Ludi E & Brown D (2007). Climate change, agricultural policy and poverty reduction–how much do we know? Natural Resource Perspectives 109. Overseas Development Institute, London.
  • Smartt J (1981). Evolving gene pools in crop plants. Euphytica 30: 415- 418.
  • Stern N (2007). The Economics of Climate Change. The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Tan A (1998). Current status of plant genetic resources in Turkey. In: Zrencirci N, Kaya Z, Anikster Y & Adams WT (eds), Proceedings of International Symposium on In situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Diversity. pp. 5-17. CRIFC, Ankara.
  • Tan A & Tan AS (2002). In situ conservation of wild species related to crop plants: the case of Turkey. In: Engels JMM, Ramantha Rao V, Brown AHD & Jackson MT (eds), Managing Plant Genetic Diversity pp. 195-204. CAB International, Wallingford, GB; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Rome.
  • Valdés B, Heywood VH, Raimondo FM & Zohary D (eds.) (1997). Conservation of the Wild Relatives of European Cultivated Plants. Azienda Foreste Demaniali della Regione Siciliana, Palermo, Italy. Bocconea 7.
  • Williams JT (1991). Plant genetic resources: some new directions. Advances in Agronomy 45: 61-91.
  • Zencirci N, Kaya Z, Anikster Y & Adams WT (eds). (1998). The Proceedings of International Symposium on in situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Diversity. Central Research Institute for Field Crops Publication, Ankara, 391p.