Using seedlessness-related molecular markers in grapevine breeding for seedlessness via marker-assisted selection into Muscat of Hamburg × Sultani progeny

The seedlessness-related molecular markers VMC7f2, SCC8, and SCF27 were used for the early selection of seedless individuals in the Muscat of Hamburg (seeded) × Sultani (seedless) progeny of 314 F1 hybrids. The DNA from F1 hybrids was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using 3 markers. After digestion of the SCC8 marker PCR amplification products by restriction enzyme Bgl II, 72 individuals showed homozygous SCC8+/SCC8+ alleles at the seed development inhibitor locus, 76 individuals of the progeny amplified with the SCF27 marker produced 2.0-kb bands, and 118 individuals with seedlessness-related 198-bp alleles amplified with the VMC7f2 marker were selected as seedless grapevine candidates. Based on marker-assisted selection, 190 F1 hybrids were designated as seedless grapevine candidates since they carried a minimum of 1 seedlessness-related allele, and the 124 F1 hybrids were removed from the seedless grapevine breeding studies. A total of 13 individuals that carried alleles for the 3 markers associated with seedlessness were selected as genetic resources for future studies on seedless grapevine breeding.

Using seedlessness-related molecular markers in grapevine breeding for seedlessness via marker-assisted selection into Muscat of Hamburg × Sultani progeny

The seedlessness-related molecular markers VMC7f2, SCC8, and SCF27 were used for the early selection of seedless individuals in the Muscat of Hamburg (seeded) × Sultani (seedless) progeny of 314 F1 hybrids. The DNA from F1 hybrids was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using 3 markers. After digestion of the SCC8 marker PCR amplification products by restriction enzyme Bgl II, 72 individuals showed homozygous SCC8+/SCC8+ alleles at the seed development inhibitor locus, 76 individuals of the progeny amplified with the SCF27 marker produced 2.0-kb bands, and 118 individuals with seedlessness-related 198-bp alleles amplified with the VMC7f2 marker were selected as seedless grapevine candidates. Based on marker-assisted selection, 190 F1 hybrids were designated as seedless grapevine candidates since they carried a minimum of 1 seedlessness-related allele, and the 124 F1 hybrids were removed from the seedless grapevine breeding studies. A total of 13 individuals that carried alleles for the 3 markers associated with seedlessness were selected as genetic resources for future studies on seedless grapevine breeding.

___

  • Roytchev V. Inheritance of grape seedlessness in seeded and seedless hybrid combinations of grape cultivars with complex genealogy. Am J Enol Viticult 49: 302–305, 1998.
  • This P, Lahogue F, Adam-Blondon AF et al. Towards markerassisted selection for seedlessness in grapevine. Acta Hortic 528: 221–229, 2000.
  • Cain DW, Emershad RL, Tarailo RE. In-ovulo embryo culture and seedling development of seeded and seedless grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis 22: 9–14, 1983.
  • Emershard RL, Ramming DW. In-ovulo embryo culture of Vitis vinifera L. cv ‘Thompson Seedless’. Am J Bot 71: 873–877, 19 Spiegel-Roy P, Sahar N, Baron J et al. In vitro culture and plant formation from grape cultivars with abortive ovules and seeds. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 110: 109–112, 1985.
  • Tangolar S, Eti S, Gök S et al. Obtaining plants from seedless x seedless grape crosses using embryo culture. Turk J Agric For 23: 935–942, 1999.
  • Mejia N, Hinrichsen P. A new, highly assertive SCAR marker potentially useful to assist selection for seedlessness in table grape breeding. Acta Hortic 603: 559–564, 2003.
  • Perl A, Sahar N, Eliassi R et al. Breeding of new seedless table grapes in Israel: conventional and biotechnological approach. Acta Hortic 603: 185–187, 2003.
  • Ledbetter CA, Burgos L. Inheritance of stenospermocarpic seedlessness in Vitis vinifera L. J Hered 85: 157–160, 1994.
  • Bouquet A, Danglot Y. Inheritance of seedlessness in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis 35: 35–42, 1996.
  • Lahogue F, This P, Bouquet A. Identification of a codominant SCAR marker linked to the seedlessness character in grapevine. Theor Appl Genet 97: 950–959, 1998.
  • Adam-Blondon AF, Lahogue-Esnault F, Bouquet A et al. Usefulness of two SCAR markers for marker-assisted selection of seedless grapevine cultivars. Vitis 40: 147–155, 2001.
  • Cabezas JA, Cervera MT, Ruiz-Garcia L et al. A genetic analysis of seed and berry weight in grapevine. Genome 49: 1572–1585, 200
  • Striem MJ, Ben-Hayyim G, Spiegel-Roy P. Identifying molecular genetic markers associated with seedlessness in grape. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 121: 758–763, 1996.
  • Yang KQ, Wang YJ, Zhang JJ et al. Analysis of restriction sites and Southern blotting of two molecular markers linked to grape seedless gene. Chin J Agr Biotechnol 3: 13–17, 2006.
  • Meija N, Gebauer M, Muñoz L et al. Identification of QTLs for seedlessness, berry size, and ripening date in a seedless x seedless table grape progeny. Am J Enol Viticult 58: 499–507, 200 Zhijian TL, Dhekney SA, Gray DJ. Molecular characterization of a SCAR marker purportedly linked to seedlessness in grapevine (Vitis). Mol Breeding 25: 637–644, 2010.
  • Mejía N, Soto B, Guerrero M et al. Molecular genetic and transcriptional evidence for a role of VvAGL11 in stenospermocarpic seedlessness in grapevine. BMC Plant Biol 11: 57, 2011.
  • Doligez A, Bouquet A, Danglot Y et al. Genetic mapping of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) applied to the detection of QTLs for seedlessness and berry weight. Theor Appl Genet 105: 780– 795, 2002.
  • Costantini L, Battilana J, Lamaj F et al. Berry and phenologyrelated traits in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): from quantitative trait loci to underlying genes. BMC Plant Biol 8: 38, 2008.
  • Korpas A, Baranek M, Pidra M et al. Behaviour of two SCAR markers for seedlessness within Central European varieties of grapevine. Vitis 48: 33–42, 2009.
  • Fatahi R, Zamani Z, Ebadi A et al. The inheritance of seedless SCC8-SCAR and SSR loci alleles in progeny of ‘Muscat Hamburg’ x ‘Bidane Qermez’ grapes. Acta Hort 652: 329–335, 200
Turkish Journal of Biology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0152
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Salicylic acid delays leaf rolling by inducing antioxidant enzymes and modulating osmoprotectant content in Ctenanthe setosa under osmotic stress

Mehmet DEMİRALAY, Aykut SAĞLAM, Asım KADIOĞLU

In vitro and in silico characterization of Solanum lycopersicum wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor-II gene

Faiza MUNIR, Syed Muhammad Saqlan NAQVI, Tariq MAHMOOD

Karyotype traits in Romanian selections of edible blue honeysuckle

Elena TRUTA, Gabriela VOCHITA, Craita Maria ROSU, Maria Magdalena ZAMFIRACHE

Identification and molecular characterization of a receptor-like protein kinase gene from Corchorus capsularis

Kh. Ambareen REZA, Sazia SHARMIN, Mahdi Muhammad MOOSA, Niaz MAHMOOD, Ajit GHOSH, Rifat Ara BEGUM, Haseena KHAN

A holistic approach for selection of Bacillus spp. as a bioremediator for shrimp postlarvae culture

Thimmalapura DEVARAJA, Sanjoy BANERJEE, Fatimah YUSOFF, Mohamed SHARIFF, Helena KHATOON

Purification of antioxidant protein isolated from Peganum harmala and its protective effect against CCl4 toxicity in rats

Hanaa AHMED, Helal Abu El ZAHAB, Gamia ALSWIAI

Compositional studies and antioxidant potential of Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth. pods and seeds

Muhammad ZIA-UL-HAQ, Shakeel AHMAD, Mughal QAYUM, Sezai ERCİŞLİ

Cytotoxic activities of some Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: possible mechanisms and approaches for inhibition

Ghadir Saeed EL-HOUSSEINY, Mohammad Mabrouk ABOULWAFA, Nadia Abdelhaleim HASSOUNA

Using seedlessness-related molecular markers in grapevine breeding for seedlessness via marker-assisted selection into Muscat of Hamburg × Sultani progeny

Murat AKKURT, Atilla ÇAKIR, Mina SHİDFAR, Filiz MUTAF, Gökhan SÖYLEMEZOĞLU

Comparison of the volatiles of Daphne pontica L. and D. oleoides Schreber subsp. oleoides isolated by hydro- and microdistillation methods

İlhan GÜRBÜZ, Betül DEMİRCİ, Gerhard FRANZ