Serological properties of pseudomonas syringae pv. phseolcola isolates collected from Eskişehir

Eskisehir’deki fasulye ekim alanlarında toplanan 36 fasulye tohumunda Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola bakterisi aranmıs ve izole edilmeye çalısılmıstır. P. s. pv. phaseolicola NCPPB 52 izolatı için spesifik poliklonal antiserum tavsanda üretilmis ve identifikasyon için hem biyokimyasal hemde serolojik testler kullanılmıstır. Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola olarak teshis edilen 92 izolat ile bu bakterinin standart suslarının ısıya dayanıklı O antijenleri Ouchterlony immunodiffüzyon testi ile karsılastırılmıs ve bütün izolatların ortak antijenik yapıya sahip oldukları görülmüstür.

Eskişehir'den toplanan Pseudomonas syringae pv.phseolicola izolatlarının serolojik özellikleri

Thirty six bean seed samples collected from bean fields in Eskisehir-Türkiye were examined for detection and isolation of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. A polyclonal antiserum specific to P. s. pv. phaseolicola NCPPB 52 was raised in a rabbit and both biochemical and serological test were used for identification. Heat-stable O antigens of 92 isolates identified as P. S. pv. phaseolicola together with authentic isolates of the bacterium were compared by Ouchterlony immunodiffusion test and all the isolates had a common antigenic structure.

___

  • 1.Başbakanlık DPT''. Yedinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı 1993-1999, Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller Özel KomisyonRaporu (Yayınlanmamış), 1994.
  • 2.Bradbury, J. F. Guide to Plant pathogenic Bacteria, United Kingdom, CAB International Mycological Instytute, 3321986 .
  • 3.Zaumeyer, W. J. and Thomas, H. R. A monographic study of bean diseases and methods for their control, U. S.Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull., 868:255, 1957.
  • 4.Epton, H. A. S. and Deverall, B. J. Physiological races of Pseudomonas phaseolicola causing halo blight of beans.Plant Pathol., 14: 53-54, 1965
  • 5.Guthrie, J. W. and Fenwick, H. S. Pathogenicity of Idaho isolates of Pseudomonas phaseolicola. Plant Dis. Reptr.,51: 591-593, 1967.
  • 6.Patel, P. N. and Walker, J. C. Resistance in Phaseolus to halo blight. Phytopathol., 55: 889-894, 1965.
  • 7.CIAT Annual Report of Bean Production Program. Cento International de Agrucultura Tropical. Calı, Colombia,1986.
  • 8.Fahy, P. C. and Lyoyd A. B., Pseudomonas: The Fluorescent Pseudomonads, Plant Bacterial Diseases, A DiagnosticGuide, Fahy, P. C. and Persley G. J., Academic Press, Australia 1983.
  • 9.Guthrie, J. W., Huber, D. M. and Fenwick, H. S. Serological detection of halo blight. Plant Dis. Reptr., 49:297-299, 1965.
  • 10.Taylor, J. D. Bacteriophage and serological methods for the identification of Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Burkh.)Dowson. Ann. appl. Biol., 66:387-397, 1970.
  • 11.Van Vuurde, J. W. L. New approach in detecting phytopathogenic bacteria by combined immunoisolation andimmunoidentification assay. EPPO Bull., 17: 139-148, 1987.
  • 12.Karaca, İ. Fitobakteriyoloji ve Bakteriyal Hastalıklar, Ege Üniversitesi Matbaası, Bornova-İzmir, 270 1977.
  • 13. Benlioğlu, K. and Özakman, M. Fasulyelerde hale lekesi Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola’nın serolojik teşhisüzerine çalışmalar. VI. Türkiye Fitopatoloji Kongresi, 7-11 Ekim İzmir., 1991.
  • 14.Güven, K. A study of strain varation in Erwinia salicis in relation to the epidemiology of watermark disease. PhDthesis, University of East Anglia UK., 1992.
  • 15.Lelliott, R. A. and Stead, D. E. Methods for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Diseases of Plants. Methods in PlantPathology, Vol. 2., Great Britain, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 216 1987
  • 16.Sands, D. C., Schroth, M. N. and Hildebrand, D. C., Pseudomonads, Laboratory Guide for Identification o PlantPathogenic Bacteria. Schaad, N. W. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1980.
  • 17.Fahy, P. C. and Hayward, A. C., Media and Methods for Isolation and Dagnostic Tests, Plant Bacterial Diseases, ADiagnostic Guide, Fahy, P. C. and Persley G. J., Academic Press, Australia 1983.
  • 18. Lucas, L. T. and Grogan, R. G. Serological variation and identification of Pseudomonas lachrymans and other phy-topathogenic Pseudomonas nomenspecies. Phytopathol., 59: 1908-1912, 1969.
  • 19.Schaad, N. W. Serological identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 17: 123-147, 1979.
  • 20.Trigalet, A., Samson, R. and Coleno, A. Problems related to the use of serology in phytobacteriology, Proceedingsof the 4th International Conference on Plant pathogenic Bacteria, 271-288, Angers, 1978.
  • 21.Van Vuurde, J. W. L. detecting seedborne bacteria by immunofluorescence, Proceedings of the 6th InternationalConference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, 779-808, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987.
  • 22.Benlioğlu, K. and Özakman, M. Evaluation of two serological methods for the identification of halo blight pathogen(Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola) of Beans. J. Türk. Phytopathol., 22: 75-84, 1993.
  • 23.Wyatt G. M., Turner, J. G. and Morgan, M. R. A. Rapid and speciic detection of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phase-olicola by immunological methods. Food and Agric. Immunol., 1: 53-63, 1989.
  • 24.De Boer, S. H., Coperman, R. J. and Vruggink, H. Serogroups of Erwinia carotovora potato strains determinedwith diffusible somatic antigens. Phytopathol., 69: 316-319, 1979.
  • 25.Jones, J. B. and Van Vuurde, J. W. L. Magnetic immunoisolation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. pelargonii,Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, part B, 907-912, Akademiai Kiado,Budapest., 1990.
  • 26.Sun, L. J., Van Der Kamp, B. J., White, E. E. and Carlson, J. E. Detection of genetic variation in western gall rustpopulation in British Columbia, using molecular markers. Can. J. Plant pathol., 17: 366, 1995