Primary Structure of the Carbohydrate-Binding Modules in Various Cellulolytic, Thermophilic, Anaerobic, Ethanol-Producing Isolates

In the present study, the carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) coding sequences of the cellulosomes of 13 thermophilic, cellulolytic, anaerobic, ethanol-producing bacterial isolates having some variations in their growth and cellulose degradation capacities were amplified by PCR and then sequenced. The sequence analysis of the amplicons revealed that CBMs of 7 of the isolates including the isolate 7-9-1 with the highest capacity of cellulose degradation in solid medium have 100% identity in both nucleotide and amino acid sequences to CipB of Clostridium thermocellum in the compared regions. On the other hand, CBM of the isolate 7-1-2, also having a high cellulolytic activity, was found to differ for as much as 66 amino acid residues out of 100 (66%). The isolate 7-9-4 with a relatively low cellulose-degrading capacity also displayed amino acid variation for this protein, but only for 4 out of 118 residues.

Primary Structure of the Carbohydrate-Binding Modules in Various Cellulolytic, Thermophilic, Anaerobic, Ethanol-Producing Isolates

In the present study, the carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) coding sequences of the cellulosomes of 13 thermophilic, cellulolytic, anaerobic, ethanol-producing bacterial isolates having some variations in their growth and cellulose degradation capacities were amplified by PCR and then sequenced. The sequence analysis of the amplicons revealed that CBMs of 7 of the isolates including the isolate 7-9-1 with the highest capacity of cellulose degradation in solid medium have 100% identity in both nucleotide and amino acid sequences to CipB of Clostridium thermocellum in the compared regions. On the other hand, CBM of the isolate 7-1-2, also having a high cellulolytic activity, was found to differ for as much as 66 amino acid residues out of 100 (66%). The isolate 7-9-4 with a relatively low cellulose-degrading capacity also displayed amino acid variation for this protein, but only for 4 out of 118 residues.

___

  • Stählberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G. Trichoderma reesei has no true exo-cellulase: all intact and truncated cellulases produce new reducing end groups on cellulose. Biochym Biophys Acta 1157: 107-113, 1993.
  • Srisodsuk M, Lehtiö J, Linder M et al. Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I with an endoglucanase cellulose-binding domain: action on microcrystalline cellulose. J. Biotechnol 57: 49- 57, 1997.
  • Glazer AN, Nikaido H. In: Microbial Biotechnology. Freeman and Company (Eds.), New York; 1995.
  • Bhat MK, Bhat S. Cellulose degrading enzymes and their potential industrial applications. Biotechnol Advan 15:583, 1997.
  • Linder M, Teeri TT. The roles and function of cellulose-binding domains. J Biotechnol 57: 15, 1997.
  • Tsoi TV, Chuvil`skaya A, Atakishieva Ya. Yu et al. Clostridium thermocellum-a new object of genetic studies. Molekulyarnaya Genetika, Mikrobiologiya i Virusologiya 11: 18-23, 1987.
  • Hintermann G, Crameri R, Kieser T et al. Restriction analysis of the Streptomyces glaucescensgenome by agarose gel electrophoresis. Arch Microbiol 130: 218-222, 1981.
  • Morag E, Lapidot A, Govorko D et al. Expression, purification and characterization of the cellulose-binding domain of the scaffolding subunit from the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 1980-1986, 1995.
  • Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-410, 1990.
  • Bayer EA, Morag E, Lamed R et al. Cellulosome structure: Four- pronged attack using biochemistry, molecular biology, crystallography and bioinformatics. In Charbohydrases from Trichoderma reesei and Other Microorganisms, Claeyssens, M., Nerinckx, W., and Piens, K., (Eds.) pp. 39-67. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London; 1998.
  • Bayer EA, Shimon LJW, Shoham Y et al. Cellulosomes-structure and ultrastructure. J Structural Biol 124:221-234, 1999.
  • Kataeva IA, Ronald D, Seidel III et al. Properties and mutation analysis of the CelK cellulose-binding domain from the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome. J Biotechnol 183: 1552- 1559, 2001.
  • Ozkan M, Desai SG, Zhang Y et al. Characterization of thirteen newly isolated strains of anaerobic, cellulolytic, thermophilic bacteria. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 27: 275-280, 2001.
  • Rainey FA, Ward NL, Morgan HW et al. Phylogenetic analysis of anaerobic thermophilic bacteria: aid for their reclassification. J Bacteriol 175: 4772-4779, 1993.