Phytoplankton Biomass and Species Composition of Lake Gölbaşı (Hatay-Turkey)

Seasonal distributions of phytoplanktonic organisms in Lake Gölbaşı were investigated in samples collected from 2 stations between May, 2001, and April, 2002. At each station, monthly sampling was performed from the surface water. The flora consisted of 41 taxa belonging to Bacillariophyta (24), Chlorophyta (12), Pyrrophyta (2), Cyanophyta (2) and Chrysophyta (1). During the 1-year study period, the most dominant group was Chrysophyta followed by Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Cyanophyta and Pyrrophyta. The highest numbers of Chrysophyta were observed in both stations in May, 2001, January, 2002 and April, 2002. Bacillariophyta had the highest biomass in both stations, followed by Chrysophyta, Pyrrophyta, Chlorophyta and Cyanophyta. The monthly changes in diversity values were between 0.01 and 0.90. The lowest diversity value was observed in the first station in January, 2001. Lake Gölbaşı has mesotrophic characteristics due to the seasonal distribution of phytoplanktonic organisms. However, it will be necessary to conduct further physical and chemical analyses of the lake water to obtain more detailed information about the trophic status of the lake

Phytoplankton Biomass and Species Composition of Lake Gölbaşı (Hatay-Turkey)

Seasonal distributions of phytoplanktonic organisms in Lake Gölbaşı were investigated in samples collected from 2 stations between May, 2001, and April, 2002. At each station, monthly sampling was performed from the surface water. The flora consisted of 41 taxa belonging to Bacillariophyta (24), Chlorophyta (12), Pyrrophyta (2), Cyanophyta (2) and Chrysophyta (1). During the 1-year study period, the most dominant group was Chrysophyta followed by Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Cyanophyta and Pyrrophyta. The highest numbers of Chrysophyta were observed in both stations in May, 2001, January, 2002 and April, 2002. Bacillariophyta had the highest biomass in both stations, followed by Chrysophyta, Pyrrophyta, Chlorophyta and Cyanophyta. The monthly changes in diversity values were between 0.01 and 0.90. The lowest diversity value was observed in the first station in January, 2001. Lake Gölbaşı has mesotrophic characteristics due to the seasonal distribution of phytoplanktonic organisms. However, it will be necessary to conduct further physical and chemical analyses of the lake water to obtain more detailed information about the trophic status of the lake

___

  • 1. Sommer U ,Gliwiez ZM, Lampert W et al.The PEG-Model of seasonal succession of plankton events in freshwaters. Arch Hydrobiol 106: 433-471, 1986.
  • 2. Gönülol A, Çornak Ö. Bafra balık gölleri (Balık gölü, Uzun göl) fitoplanktonu üzerine floristik çalıflmalar I-Cyanophyta. Doga-Tr J of Botany 16: 223-245, 1992.
  • 3. Gönülol A, Çornak Ö. Bafra balık gölleri (Balık Gölü, Uzun Göl) fitoplanktonu üzerine floristik çalıflmalar II-Euglenophyta. DogaTr J of Botany 17:163-169, 1993a.
  • 4. Gürbüz H, Altuner Z. Palandöken (Tekederesi) göleti fitoplankton toplulu¤u üzerinde kalitatif ve kantitatif bir arafltırma. Tr J Biol 24: 13-30, 2000.
  • 5. Akbulut A, Yıldız A.The planktonic diatoms of lake çıldır (ArdahanTurkey). Doga Tr J of Botany 26: 55-75,2002.
  • 6. Dere fi, Karacao¤lu D, Dalkıran N. A study on the epiphytic algae of the Nilüfer stream (Bursa). Doga-Tr J of Botany 26: 219- 233,2002.
  • 7. Round FE. The Biology of algae. 2nd edn Edward Arnold London;1973.
  • 8. Lund JWG, Kipling C, Gren ED. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 113-170,1958.,
  • 9. Smith GM. The Freshwater algae of the United States. Rev ed McGraw-Hill. New York; 1950.
  • 10. Charles CD. The marine and freshwater plankton. Mishigan State University Press. Mishigan; 1955.
  • 11. Edmondson WT. Freshwater biology. University of Washington Seattle. London; 1959.
  • 12. James GN, Paul RN. A guide to the study of freshwater biology. Holden&Day, Inc. San Francisco;1966.
  • 13. Akbay N. Fitoplankton ve zooplanktonun hacim ve a¤ırlıklarının (biomass) hesaplanmasında geometrik flekillerinin kullanılması. Devlet Su ‹flleri Yayınları. Ankara;1987.
  • 14. Willen T. The phytoplankton of Gorwalm, a bay of lake Malaren. Oikos. 10: 241-274, 1959.
  • 15. Nauwerck A. The relation between zooplankton and phytoplankton in lake Erken. Symb Bot Ups 17: 1-163, 1963
  • 16. Washington HG. Diversity, Biotic and similarity indices. A review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Water Research 186: 653-694, 1984.
  • 17. Çetin AK. Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) in the phytoplankton of Keban reservoir and their seasonal variations. Tr J of Botany 22: 25-33, 1998.
  • 18. Munawar M, Munawar IF, Sprules WG. The plankton ecology of lake. Hydrobiologia 219: 203-227,1991.
  • 19. Lund JWG. The ecology of the freshwater phytoplankton. Biological Reviews. 40: 231-293, 1965.
  • 20. Richardson TL, Gibson CE, Heaney SI. Temperature, growth and seasonal succession of phytoplankton in lake Baikal, Siberia. Freshwater Biology 44: 43-440, 2000.
  • 21. Izaguirre I, O’Farrell I, Tell G. Variation in phytoplankton composition and limnological features in a water-water ecotone of lower Parana Basin (Argentina). Freshwater Biology 46: 63-74, 2001.
  • 22. Reynolds CS. The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge (UK);1984.
  • 23. Hutchinson GE. A Treatise on limnology II. Introduction to lake biology and the limnoplankton. John Wiley Pub. Newyork; 1967.
  • 24. Thompson PA, Rhee GY. Phytoplankton responses to eutrophication. Arch Hydrobiol (Algae Water Pollut) 42 :125- 166,1994.
  • 25. Germain H. Flora des diatomees. Diatomophycees. Societe Nauvelle Des Editions Boubee. Paris ;1981.
  • 26. Aykulu G, Obalı O, Gönülol A. Ankara çevresindeki bazı göllerde fitoplanktonun yayılıflı. Do¤a Bilim Dergisi 7: 277-288,1983.
  • 27. Obalı O. Mogan gölü fitoplanktonunun mevsimsel de¤iflimi. Doga Bilim Dergisi A2-8: 91-103,1984.
  • 28. fien B, Yıldız K, Akbulut A et al. Karamuk gölü planktonunun Bacillariophyta üyeleri ve su kalitesinin de¤erlendirilmesi. XII. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi. Fırat Üniversitesi at Elazı¤, Turkey;1994.
  • 29. Rosenström U, Lepistö R. Phytoplankton indicator species of different types of Boreal lakes. Algological Studies 82: 131- 140,1996.
  • 30. Akbay N, Anul N, Yerli S et al. Seasonal distribution of large phytoplankton in the Keban dam reservoir. Journal of Plankton Research 21 (4): 771-787, 1999.
  • 31. Fogg GE. Algal cultures and phytoplankton ecology,2nd edn University of Wisconsin Press. London; 1975.
  • 32. Porter KG. Phagotrophic phytoflagellates in microbial food webs. Hydrobiologia 159(1): 89-97, 1988.
  • 33. Jones RI, Rees S. Influence of temperarure and light on particle ingestion by the freshwater phytoflagellate Dinobryon. Arch Hydrobiol 132(2): 203-211,1994.
  • 34. Isaksson A. Phagotrophic phytoflagellates in lakes. A literature review. Arch Hydrobiol 51: 63-90,1998.
  • 35. Pugnetti A, Bettinetti R. Biomass and species structure of the phytoplankton of an high Mountain lake. J Limnol 58 (2):127- 130,1999.
  • 36. DBTE. Beyflehir termik santralı so¤utma suyu sistemi ve Beyflehir gölü termik kirlenmesi arafltırmaları. D.E.Ü. Deniz Bilimleri ve Tek Ens Proje No: DBTE-026,‹zmir;1983.
  • 37. Gönülol A, Obalı O. A study on the phytoplankton of Hasan U¤urlu dam lake (Samsun-Turkey). Tr J of Biology. 22: 447-461,1998.
  • 38. Gönülol A, Çornak Ö. Bafra balık gölleri (Balık Gölü, Uzun Göl) fitoplanktonu üzerine floristik çalıflmalar III-Chlorophyta . Doga Tr J of Botany 17:227-236,1993b.
  • 39. fiazıcı N, Gönülol A. Suat U¤urlu baraj gölü (Çarflamba, SamsunTurkey) fitoplanktonu üzerine florostik ve ekolojik bir arafltırma. EÜ Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Su Ürünleri Dergisi 11: 31-56,1994.
  • 40. Barone R, Flores LN. Phytoplankton dynamics in a shallow, hypereutrophic reservoir (Lake Arancio, Sicily). Hydrobiologia 289: 199-214,1994.