Immobilized periphytic cyanobacteria for removal of nitrogenous compounds and phosphorus from shrimp farm wastewater

Cyanobacteria can be used to remove nitrogenous compounds from wastewater, but a major bottleneck in the process is the separation of cyanobacterial biomass from the treated water discharge, which may cause eutrophication. The current study assessed the suitability of three periphytic cyanobacteria (Geitlerinema sp., Gloeotrichia sp., and Lyngbya sp.) isolated from shrimp ponds. These cyanobacteria were immobilized by self-adhesion to polyvinyl chloride sheets, forming mats, and were screened for their efficacy to reduce nitrogenous compounds and phosphorus. Among the three isolates, Geitlerinema sp. showed the highest reduction rate (98%) and was further tested using shrimp pond wastewater. The results showed that initial wastewater concentrations (mg L-1) of total ammonia nitrogen (5.0), nitrite nitrogen (2.9), and soluble reactive phosphorus (2.5) were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced within 7 days in tanks containing wastewater + Geitlerinema sp. mats (0.1, 0.2, and 0.8) compared to wastewater + substrate only (4.3, 2.7, and 2.3) or wastewater only (4.4, 2.8, and 2.4). In addition, Geitlerinema sp. was found to be nontoxic to Artemia. Fast and effective sequestration of nutrients from wastewater by the Geitlerinema mats, as well as ease of harvesting from the mats, make this treatment an attractive alternative for wastewater treatment.

Immobilized periphytic cyanobacteria for removal of nitrogenous compounds and phosphorus from shrimp farm wastewater

Cyanobacteria can be used to remove nitrogenous compounds from wastewater, but a major bottleneck in the process is the separation of cyanobacterial biomass from the treated water discharge, which may cause eutrophication. The current study assessed the suitability of three periphytic cyanobacteria (Geitlerinema sp., Gloeotrichia sp., and Lyngbya sp.) isolated from shrimp ponds. These cyanobacteria were immobilized by self-adhesion to polyvinyl chloride sheets, forming mats, and were screened for their efficacy to reduce nitrogenous compounds and phosphorus. Among the three isolates, Geitlerinema sp. showed the highest reduction rate (98%) and was further tested using shrimp pond wastewater. The results showed that initial wastewater concentrations (mg L-1) of total ammonia nitrogen (5.0), nitrite nitrogen (2.9), and soluble reactive phosphorus (2.5) were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced within 7 days in tanks containing wastewater + Geitlerinema sp. mats (0.1, 0.2, and 0.8) compared to wastewater + substrate only (4.3, 2.7, and 2.3) or wastewater only (4.4, 2.8, and 2.4). In addition, Geitlerinema sp. was found to be nontoxic to Artemia. Fast and effective sequestration of nutrients from wastewater by the Geitlerinema mats, as well as ease of harvesting from the mats, make this treatment an attractive alternative for wastewater treatment.

___

  • APHA (1992). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association.
  • Bellinger EG (1992). A Key to Common Algae. Freshwater, Estuarine and Some Coastal Species. London, UK: Institute of Water and Environmental Management.
  • Bender J, Lee R, Sheppard M, Brinkley K, Phillips P, Yeboah Y, Wah RC (2004). A waste effluent treatment system based on microbial mats for black sea bass Centropristis striata recycled- water mariculture. Aquacult Eng 31: 73–82.
  • Bender J, Phillips P (2004). Microbial mats for multiple applications in aquaculture and bioremediation. Bioresource Technol 94: 229–238.
  • Bender J, Vatcharapijarn Y, Russell A (1989). Fish feeds from grass clippings. Aquacult Eng 8: 407–419.
  • Boominathan M, Manoharan C (2008). Interaction of Spirulina platensis with starchy effluent. J Sci Trans Environ Technov 2: 102–108.
  • Bratvold D, Browdy CL (2001). Effect of sand sediment and vertical surfaces (AquaMats™) on production, water quality and microbial ecology in an intensive Litopenaeus vannamei culture system. Aquaculture 195: 81–94.
  • Cañizares RO, Rivas L, Montes C, Domínguez AR, Travieso L, Benítez F (1994). Aerated swine-wastewater treatment with K-carrageenan immobilized Spirulina maxima. Bioresource Technol 47: 89–91.
  • Chevalier P, de la Noüe J (1985). Efficiency of immobilized hyperconcentrated algae for ammonium and orthophosphate removal from wastewaters. Biotechnol Lett 6: 395–400.
  • de la Noüe J, Chevalier P, Proulx D (1990). Effluent treatment with immobilized microalgae and cyanobacteria: a critical assessment. In: Tyagi RD, Vembu K, editors. Wastewater Treatment by Immobilized Cells. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, pp. 143–152.
  • de la Noüe J, Proulx D (1988). Biological tertiary treatment of urban wastewaters with chitosan-immobilized Phormidium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 29: 292–297.
  • Devaraja T, Banerjee S, Yusoff F, Shariff M, Khatoon H (2013). A holistic approach for selection of Bacillus spp. as a bioremediator for shrimp postlarvae culture. Turk J Biol 37: 92–100.
  • Franco-Rivera A, Paniagua-Michel J, Zamora-Castro J (2007). Characterization and performance of constructed nitrifying biofilms during nitrogen bioremediation of a wastewater effluent. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34: 279–287.
  • Garbisu C, Gil JM, Bazin MJ, Hall DO, Serra JL (1991). Removal of nitrate from water by foam-immobilized Phormidium laminosum in batch and continuous-flow bioreactors. J Appl Phycol 3: 221–234.
  • Hoffmann JP (1998). Wastewater treatment with suspended and nonsuspended algae. J Appl Phycol 34: 757–763.
  • Hrouzek P, Kopecký J, Salát J, Maršálek B, Lukešová A (2005). Cytotoxic effect of soil cyanobacterial extracts to mammal cell lines YAC-1 and WEHI. Czech Phycol 5: 79–90.
  • Huchette SMH, Beveridge MCM (2005). Periphyton-based cage aquaculture. In: Azim E, Verdegem MCJ, van Dam AA, Beveridge MCM, editors. Periphyton: Ecology, Exploitation and Management. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, pp. 237–244.
  • Jiménez-Pérez MV, Sánchez-Castillo P, Romera O, Fernández- Moreno D, Pérez-Martínez C (2004). Growth and nutrient removal in free and immobilized planktonic green algae isolated from pig manure. Enzyme Microb Tech 34: 392–398.
  • Ju ZY, Forster I, Conquest L, Dominy W, Kuo WC, Hargen FD (2008). Determination of microbial community structures of shrimp floc cultures by biomarkers and analysis of floc amino acid profiles. Aquac Res 35: 118–133.
  • Kamilya D, Sarkar S, Maiti TK, Bandyopadhyay S, Mal BC (2006). Growth and nutrient removal rates of Spirulina platensis and Nostoc muscorum in fish culture effluent: a laboratory-scale study. Aquac Res 37: 1594–1597.
  • Keshavanath P, Gangadhar B, Ramesh TJ, Beveridge MCM, van Dam AA, Verdegem MCJ (2001). On-farm evaluation of Indian major carp production with sugarcane bagasse as substrate for periphyton. Asian Fish Sci 14: 367–376.
  • Khatoon H, Yusoff FM, Banerjee S, Shariff M, Bujang JS (2007a). Formation of periphyton biofilm and subsequent biofouling on different substrates in nutrient enriched brackishwater shrimp ponds. Aquaculture 273: 470–477.
  • Khatoon H, Yusoff FM, Banerjee S, Shariff M, Mohamed S (2007b). Use of periphytic cyanobacteria and mixed diatoms coated substrates for improving water quality, survival and growth of Penaeus monodon postlarvae in closed water hatchery system. Aquaculture 271: 196–205.
  • Lezama-Cervantes C, Paniagua-Michel J (2010). Effects of constructed microbial mats on water quality and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei post-larvae. Aquacult Eng 42: 75–81.
  • Lincoln RA, Strupinski K, Walker JM (1996). The use of Artemia nauplii (brine shrimp larvae) to detect toxic compounds from microalgae cultures. Int J Pharmacogn 34: 384–389.
  • Liu YK, Seki M, Tanaka H, Furusaki S (1998). Characteristics of loofa (Luffa cylindrica) sponge as a carrier for plant cell immobilization. J Ferment Bioeng 85: 416–421.
  • Mallick N (2002). Biotechnological potential of immobilized algae for wastewater N, P and metal removal: a review. Biometals 15: 377–390.
  • Manoharan C, Subramanian G (1992). Sewage-cyanobacterial interaction – A case study. IJEP 12: 254–258.
  • Mohamed ZA, El-Sharouny HM, Ali WSM (2006). Microcystin production in benthic mats of cyanobacteria in the Nile River and irrigation canals, Egypt. Toxicon 47: 584–590.
  • Mulbry W, Westhead EK, Pizarro C, Sikora L (2005). Recycling of manure nutrients: use of algal biomass from dairy manure treatment as a slow release fertilizer. Bioresource Technol 96: 451–458.
  • Nübel U, Garcia-Pichel F, Muyzer G (1997). PCR primers to amplify 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microb 63: 3327–3332.
  • Olguín EJ (2003). Phycoremediation: Key issues for cost-effective nutrient removal processes. Biotechnol Adv 22: 81–91.
  • Parsons TR, Maita Y, Laili CM (1984). A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis. New York, NY, USA: Pergamon Press.
  • Pearl HW, Tucker CS (1995). Ecology of blue-green algae in aquaculture ponds. J World Aquacult Soc 26: 109–131.
  • Phillips P, Bender J (1995). Biological remediation of mixed waste by microbial mats. FFEJ 6: 77–85.
  • Shelknanloymilan L, Atici T, Obal O (2012). Removal of nitrogen and phosphate by using Choleralla vulgaris on synthetic and organic materials waste water. Bio Di Con 5: 89–94.
  • Shrestha MK, Knud-Hansen CF (1994). Increasing attached microorganism biomass as a management strategy for Nile tiapia (Oreochromis niloticus) production. Aquacult Eng 13: 101–108.
  • Sládečková A (1994). The role of periphyton in waste treatment technology. Verh Internat Verein Theor Angew Limnol 25: 1929–1932.
  • Sökmen A (2001). Antiviral and cytotoxic activities of extracts from the cell cultures and respective parts of some Turkish medicinal plants. Turk J Biol 25: 343–350.
  • Sriram S, Seenivasan R (2012). Microalgae cultivation in wastewater for nutrient removal. J Algal Biomass Utln 3: 9–13.
  • Stolz JF (2000). Microbial sediments. In: Riding RE, Awramik SM, editors. Structure of Microbial Mats and Biofilms. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 1–8.
  • Thompson FL, Abreu PC, Wasielesky W (2002). Importance of biofilm for water quality and nourishment in intensive shrimp culture. Aquaculture 203: 263–278.
  • Tidwell JH, Coyle SD, Schulmeister G (1998). Effects of added substrate on the production and population characteristics of freshwater prawns (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) to increasing amounts of artificial substrate in ponds. J World Aquac Soc 31: 174–179.
  • Tompkins J, Deville MM, Day JG, Turner MF (1995). Catalogue of Strains. Kendal, UK: Titus Wilson and Son Ltd.
  • Travieso L, Benitez F, Weiland P, Sánchez E, Dupeyrón R, Dominguez AR (1996). Experiments on immobilization of microalgae for nutrient removal in wastewater treatments. Bioresource Technol 55: 181–186.
  • Urrutia I, Serra JL, Llama MJ (1995). Nitrate removal from water by Scenedesmus obliquus immobilized in polymeric foams. Enzyme Microb Tech 17: 200–205.
  • Vijayakumar S (2012). Potential applications of cyanobacteria in industrial effluents – a review. J Bioremed Biodeg 3: 154.
  • Vijayakumar S, Tajudden N, Manoharan C (2005). Role of cyanobacteria in the treatment of dye industry effluent. Pollut Res 24: 79–84.
  • Yusoff FM, Banerjee S, Khatoon H, Shariff M (2011). Biological approaches in management of nitrogenous compounds in aquaculture systems. Dyn Biochem Process Biotech Mol Biol 5: 21–31.
  • Ziemann DA, Walsh WA, Saphore EG, Fulton-Bennet K (1992). A survey of water quality characteristics of effluent from Hawaiian aquaculture facilities. J World Aquacult Soc 23: 180–191.
Turkish Journal of Biology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0152
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Investigation of the in vivo interaction between β-lactamase and its inhibitor protein

Nilay GÖKGÖZ BÜDEYRİ, Simay YALAZ, Gizem BULDUM, Elif ÖLMEZ ÖZKIRIMLI, Naze Gül AVCI, Berna AKBULUT SARIYAR

Influence of carbon sources on growth and GC-MS based metabolite profiling of Arnica montana L. hairy roots

Maria PETROVA, Ely ZAYOVA, İvayla DINCHEVA, İlian BADJAKOV, Mariana VLAHOVA

Organ-specific antioxidant defenses and FT-IR spectroscopy of muscles in Crucian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) exposed to environmental Pb2+

Sher Ali KHAN, Xiaoyu LIU, Hong LI, Wenting FAN, Bakht Ramin SHAH, Jingna LI, Lu ZHANG, Suyan CHEN, Sher Bahadar KHAN

A letter in response to "Cancer stem cells: emerging actors in both basic and clinical cancer research" Turk J Biol (2014) 38: ©TÜBITAK - doi:10.3906/biy-1406-93 Cancer stem cells (CSCs): targets and strategies for intervention

SURESH PALAMADAI KRISHNAN

A letter in response to "Cancer stem cells: emerging actors in both basic and clinical cancer research" Turk J Biol (2014) 38: ©TÜBITAK - doi:10.3906/biy-1406-93 Cancer stem cells (CSCs): targets and strategies for intervention

SURESH PALAMADAI KRISHNAN

Molecular characterization of diverse wheat germplasm for puroindolineproteins and their antimicrobial activity

Vishal CHUGH, Kirandeep KAUR, DHARMENDRA SINGH, Vinod KUMAR, Harinderjit KAUR, HARCHARAN SINGH DHALIWAL

Histone deacetylase inhibitory activity of hydroxycapsaicin, a synthetic derivative of capsaicin, and its cytotoxic effects against human colon cancer cell lines

Thanaset SENAWONG, Paweena WONGPHAKHAM, Thussanee SAIWICHAI, Chanokbhorn PHAOSIRI, Pakit KUMBOONMA

Whole-genome DNA methylation analysis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under different salt stresses

Xuke LU, Xiaojie ZHAO, Delong WANG, Zujun YIN, Junjuan WANG, Weili FAN, Shuai WANG, Tianbao ZHANG, Wuwei YE

Development of therapeutic proteins: advances and challenges

MUHAMMAD SAJID HAMID AKASH, KANWAL REHMAN, MUHAMMAD TARIQ, SHUQING CHEN

In vitro high frequency regeneration through apical shoot proliferation of Hemianthus callitrichoides `Cuba' - a multipurpose ornamental aquatic plant

Surendra BARPETE, Sancar Fatih ÖZCAN, Muhammad AASIM, Sebahattin ÖZCAN