The effects of sulfur, cattle, and poultry manure addition on soil phosphorus

The effects of sulfur, cattle, and poultry manure addition on soil phosphorus

Use of organic manures for soil amendment has gained renewed attention with growing concerns about sustaining soil productivity. A greenhouse study was carried out to determine the influence of different soil amendments, namely poultry manure (PM), cattle manure (CM), and sulfur (S), on soil P status. The application rates were 0, 4, and 8 t ha 1 for PM; 0, 20, and 40 t ha 1 for CM; and 0, 0.75, and 1.5 t ha 1 for S treatments. Individual additions of PM and CM unlike S significantly affected phosphorus (P) concentrations in soils. The highest Olsen P and total P (TP) were with the highest PM (8 t ha 1) and CM (40 t ha 1) treatments. The addition of PM increased Olsen P to 59.2 mg kg 1 and TP to 761 mg kg 1. For the CM treatments, the highest Olsen P (66.5 mg kg 1) and TP (713 mg kg 1) concentrations were with the highest CM treatments (40 t ha 1). While PM additions decreased the bioavailability factor, CM increased it. Increasing S treatments decreased soil pH (8.0 to 7.8) but not statistically significantly. Application of S significantly increased EC (801.6 to 1163.4 µs cm 1). While the applications of CM increased shoot P concentrations unlike root P concentrations, PM and S did not significantly influence plant shoot or root P concentrations. Plant shoot P concentration was higher compared to root P concentration as expected due to the transformation of P from root to shoot. Poultry manure had no effect on plant length or weight. However, they were significantly increased by increasing additions of CM and S. The study indicated that CM addition is more effective on soil Olsen P and plant P concentrations as well as plant growth compared to PM and S. There are controversial results in the literature depending on the nature of amendments, plant systems, and specific soil properties. Therefore, more research is needed on manure as a soil amendment.

___

  • Ajiboye B, Akinremi OO, Racz GJ (2004). Laboratory characterization of phosphorus in fresh and oven-dried organic amendments. J Environ Qual 33: 1062-1069.
  • Arai Y, Sparks DL (2007). Phosphate reaction dynamics in soils and minerals: a multiscale approach. Adv. Agron 94: 135-179.
  • Bouyoucos GJ (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of the soil. Agronomy J 43: 434- 438.
  • Dikinya O, Mufwanzala N (2010) Chicken manure-enhanced soil fertility and productivity: effects of application rates. J Soil Sci Environ Manag 1: 46-54.
  • El-Fayoumy ME, El-Gamal AM (1998). Effects of sulphur application rates on nutrients availability, uptake and potato quality and yield in calcareous soil. Egypt J Soil Sci 38: 271-286.
  • Elgala AM, Eid MA, Al-Shandoody HG (1998). The Effect of organic matter, sulphur and Fe application on availability of certain nutrients in the soils of El-Phahera Area, Sultanate of Oman. Arab Universities J Agric Sci 2: 607-623.
  • Frossard E, Condron LM, Oberson A, Sinaj S, Fardeau JC (2000). Process governing phosphorus availability in temperate soils. J Environ Qual 29: 15-23.
  • Hiradate S, Uchida N (2004). Effects of soil organic matter on pHdependent phosphate sorption by soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50: 665-675.
  • Hosseinpur A, Pashamokhtari H (2013). The effects of incubation on phosphorus desorption properties, phosphorus availability, and salinity of biosolids-amended soils. Environ Earth Sci 69: 899-908.
  • Iyamuremye F, Dick RP, Baham J (1996). Organic amendments and soil phosphorus dynamics: I. Phosphorus chemistry and sorption. Soil Sci 161: 426-435.
  • Jaggi RC, Aulakh MS, Sharma R (2005). Impacts of elemental S applied under various temperature and moisture regimes on pH and available P in acidic, neutral and alkaline soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 41: 52-28.
  • Kelling KA, staff: Nonconventional soil additives: Products, companies, ingredients, and claims. NCR-103 Committee on Nontraditional Soil Amendments and Growth Stimulants 2004. [http://alfi.soils.wisc.edu/extension/hottopics/ nonconventional.pdf].
  • Leytem AB, Turner BL, Raboy V, Peterson KL (2005). Linking manure properties to phosphorus solubility in calcareous soils: importance of the manure carbon to phosphorus ratio. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69: 1516-1524.
  • Leytem AB, Smith DR, Applegate TJ, Thacker PA (2006). Influence of manure properties phytic acid on phosphorus solubility in calcareous soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70: 1629-1638.
  • Linder RC, Harley CP (1942). A rapid method for the determination of nitrogen in plant tissue. Science 96: 565-566.
  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean L (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ 939: 1-19.
  • Opala PA, Okalebo JR, Othieno CO (2012). Effects of organic and inorganic materials on soil acidity and phosphorus availability in a soil incubation study. ISRN Agronomy, Article ID597216, 10 pages.
  • Reddy KR, Overcash MR, Khaleel R, Westerman PW (1980). Phosphorus adsorption-desorption characteristics of two soils utilized for disposal of animal wastes. J. Environ Qual 9: 86-92.
  • Reddy DD, Rao AS, Rupa TR (2000). Effects of continuous use of cattle manure and fertilizer phosphorus on crop yields and soil organic phosphorus in a Vertisol. Bioresource Tech 75: 113- 118.
  • SAS Institute (2001). SAS/STAT user’s guide. Release. 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
  • Sharpley AN (1983). Effect of soil properties on the kinetics of phosphorus desorption. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47: 462-467.
  • Sharpley AN, Smith SJ, Stewart JWB, Mathers AC (1984). Phosphorus forms in soil receiving feedlot waste. J Environ Qual 13: 211- 215.
  • Simard RR, Beauchemin S, Royer I, Barnett GM (2001). Manure impact on phosphorus transfer from soil to surface waters.
  • P.21-33. In: Proc. Alberta Soil Sci Workshop, 38th, Lethbridge, AB, Canada. 20–22 Feb. 2001. Alberta Agric Food and Rural Development Edmonton.
  • Slaton NA, Norman RJ, Gilmour JT (1999). Oxidation rates of commercial elemental sulfur products applied to an alkaline silt loam from Arkansas. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 239-243.
  • Smith DR, Moore PA, Maxwell CV, Haggard BE, Daniel TC (2004). Reducing phosphorus runoff from swine manure with dietary phytase and aluminum chloride. J Environ Qual 33: 1048-1054.
  • Soaud AA, Al Darwish FH, Saleh ME, El-Tarabily KA, SofianAzirun M, Rahman MM (2011). Effects of elemental sulfur, phosphorus, micronutrients and Paracoccus versutus on nutrient availability of calcareous soils. Aust J Crop Sci 5: 554- 561.
  • Sommers LE, Nelson DW (1972). Determinations of total phosphorus in soils: a rapid perchloric acid digestion procedure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 36: 902-904.
  • Sonmez O, Kaya C, Aydemir S. 2009. Determination of zinc phytoavailability in soil by diffusive gradient in thin films (DGT). Com Soil Sci Plant Anal 40: 3407-3423.
  • Subba Roa A, Sammi Reddy K, Tahhar PN (1995). Phosphorus management - a key to boost productivity of soybean-wheat cropping system on swell-shrink soils. Fert News 40: 87-95.
  • Sui Y, Thompson ML (2000). Phosphorus sorption, desorption, and buffering capacity in a biosolids-amended Mollisol. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64: 164-169.
  • Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996). Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3: Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series No: 5. Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, pp. 1201-1230.
  • Tang C, Sparling GP, McLay CDA, Raphael C (1999). Effect of shortterm legume residue decomposition on soil acidity, Aust J Soil Res 37: 561-573.
  • Walkley A, Black LA (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37: 29-38.