Seed biopriming mitigates terminal drought stress at reproductive stage of maize by enhancing gas exchange attributes and nutrient uptake

Seed biopriming mitigates terminal drought stress at reproductive stage of maize by enhancing gas exchange attributes and nutrient uptake

Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important cereal crop around the globe. Scarcity of water is one of the major abiotic factorsreducing yields in this crop. The development of maize varieties with stress-tolerant traits is time-consuming and laborious work.There is a strong need to develop techniques that could have the effect of reducing irrigation requirements and mitigating waterstressconditions. Biopriming (seed priming with bacterial inoculation) is a newly emerging, simple, and easily adaptable strategy tomitigate drought stress for enhanced crop production. The current trial was executed using a randomized complete block design withfactorial arrangements during the spring seasons of 2016 and 2017 at the research area of the Department of Agronomy, BahauddinZakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. The experiment consisted of two irrigation levels (normal irrigation and terminal drought stressat reproductive stage) and three seed priming techniques (control, hydropriming, and biopriming). Hybrid maize variety HC9091 wasused as a test species. For hydropriming, seeds were soaked in distilled water (ratio 1:5) for 12 h. For biopriming, the hydroprimedseeds were inoculated with bacteria culture (Rhizobium phaseoli-RS-1 + Pseudomonas spp.) at the ratio of 1:5. Seeds were sown onridges, maintaining a 75-cm row-to-row and 22.5-cm plant-to-plant distance. The results indicated an overall decline in agronomic andphysiological attributes of the plants under terminal drought stress. However, seed biopriming considerably ameliorated the droughtinduceddeterioration in agronomic (plant height, cobs per plant, cob length, cob weight, grain yield, biological yield, and harvest index)as well as physiological (photosynthesis, transpiration rate, intrinsic water use efficiency, stomatal conductance, relative water content,and nutrient uptake) parameters of plants. It is concluded that seed biopriming is an easy, commercially feasible, cost-effective techniqueand an ecofriendly way to cope with drought stress at the reproductive growth stage of maize in order to enhance crop productivity.

___

  • Ahmad I, Akhtar MJ, Asghar HN, Ghafoor U, Shahid M (2015). Differential effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on maize growth and cadmium uptake. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 35 (3): 303-315.
  • Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Khalid M, Nazli F, Arshad M (2013). Efficacy of Rhizobium and Pseudomonas strains to improve physiology, ionic balance and quality of mung bean under saltaffected conditions on farmer’s fields. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 63 (1): 170-176.
  • Ahmadi A, Siosemardeh A (2005). Investigation on the physiological basis of grain yield and drought resistance in wheat: leaf photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and non-stomatal limitation. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 7 (5): 807-811.
  • Alexandre A, Oliveira S (2013). Response to temperature stress in rhizobia. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 39 (3): 219-228.
  • Anjum SA, Xie X, Wang L, Saleem MF, Man C et al. (2011). Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6 (9): 2026-2032.
  • Enz M, Dachler C (1997). Compendium of Growth Stage Identification Keys for Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants. Extended BBCH Scale. Berlin, Germany: BBA, BSA, IGZ, IVA, AgrEvo, BASF, Bayer, Novartis.
  • Farooq M, Hussain M, Siddique KHM (2014). Drought stress in wheat during flowering and grain-filling periods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 33 (4): 331-349.
  • Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009). Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (1): 185-212.
  • Fereres E, Soriano MA (2007). Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Journal of Experimental Botany 58 (2): 147-159.
  • Grover M, Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Rasul A, Venkateswarlu B (2010). Role of microorganisms in adaptation of agriculture crops to abiotic stresses. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 27 (5): 1231-1240.
  • Hussain MB, Mahmood S, Ahmed N, Nawaz H (2018). Rhizobial inoculation for improving growth physiology, nutrition and yield of maize under drought stress conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 50 (5): 1681-1689.
  • Hussain MB, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Mahmood S (2014). Scrutinizing rhizobia to rescue maize growth under reduced water conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 78 (2): 538-545.
  • Hussain MB, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Mubaraka R, Naveed M (2016). Efficacy of rhizobia for improving photosynthesis, productivity and mineral nutrition of maize. CLEAN—Soil, Air, Water 44 (11): 1-8.
  • Ilyas N, Bano A, Iqbal S (2008). Variation in Rhizobium and Azospirillum strains isolated from maize growing in arid and semiarid areas. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 10 (6): 612-618.
  • Jackson ML (1962). Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall Corporation.
  • Jambunathan N (2010). Determination and detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation, and electrolyte leakage in plants. In: Sunkar R (editor). Plant Stress Tolerance: Methods in Molecular Biology. New York, NY, USA: Humana Press, pp. 291-297.
  • Kaymak HC, Güvenç I, Yaralı F, Dönmez MF (2009). The effects of bio-priming with PGPR on germination of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) seeds under saline conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 33 (1): 173-179.
  • Li YP, Ye W, Wang M, Yan XD (2009). Climate change and drought: a risk assessment of crop-yield impacts. Climate Research 39 (1): 31-46.
  • Lucy M, Reed E, Glick BR (2004). Applications of free living plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 86 (1): 1-25.
  • Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Demontis A, El-Ahmed A, Del Moral LG et al. (2011). Association mapping in durum wheat grown across a broad range of water regimes. Journal of Experimental Botany 62 (2): 409-438.
  • Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004). Plant growth-promoting bacteria that confer resistance to water stress in tomato and pepper. Plant Science 166 (2): 525-530.
  • Naveed M, Hussain MB, Zahir ZA, Mitter B, Sessitsch A (2014). Drought stress amelioration in wheat through inoculation with Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. Plant Growth Regulation 73 (2): 121-131.
  • Nawaz H, Hussain N, Yasmeen A, Bukhari SAH, Hussain MB (2017). Seed priming: a potential stratagem for ameliorating soil water deficit in wheat. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 54 (2): 241-254.
  • Nawaz H, Yasmeen A, Anjum MA, Hussain N (2016). Exogenous application of growth enhancers mitigate water stress in wheat by antioxidant elevation. Frontiers in Plant Science 7 (597): 1-11.
  • Richards LA (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Agricultural Handbook 60. Washington, DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture.
  • Ryan J, Estefan G, Rashid A (2001). Soil and Plant Analysis Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edition. Aleppo, Syria: International Center for Agriculture in Dry Areas.
  • Saleem M, Arshad M, Hussain S, Bhatti AS (2007). Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 34 (10): 635-648.
  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dicky DA (1997). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book International Corporation.
  • Wolf B (1982). The comprehensive system of leaf analysis and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 13 (12): 1035-1059.
  • Yang J, Kloepper JW, Ryu CM (2009). Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends in Plant Science 14 (1): 1-4.
  • Zafar-ul-Hye M, Ahmad M, Shahzad SM (2013). Synergistic effect of rhizobia and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on the growth and nodulation of lentil seedlings under axenic conditions. Soil & Environment 32 (1): 79-86.
  • Zahir ZA, Zafar-ul-Hye M, Sajjad S, Naveed M (2011). Comparative effectiveness of Pseudomonas and Serratia sp. containing ACCdeaminase for coinoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum to improve growth, nodulation and yield of lentil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 47 (4): 457-465.