Phytoremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) using plant species in Iran

Plant-based remediation is a relatively new, efficient, and environmentally friendly technology, which can be promising for removing many contaminants like hydrocarbon pollutants. The main objectives of the current study were to investigate the effect of petroleum hydrocarbons with high initial concentration (about 3.5% by weight) on growth characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.), and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) as well as to evaluate the phytoremediation potential of the 2 mentioned plant species in highly contaminated, aged soil. In order to improve the condition of soil nutrients and also study the effect of soil amendment on plant growth, peat amendment was also considered. Soil samples were analyzed for TPH removal by GC-FID. Used plant species showed promising growth behavior in highly contaminated soil. A decrease of TPHs was found over the course of the experiment in all treatments. The maximum removal was obtained in tall fescue, in which tall fescue removed 96.3% of the initial TPHs from soil. Peat amendment showed positive effect on plant growth on contaminated soil. Results demonstrated that the 2 studied plant species were effective and promising in removing TPHs from contaminated, aged soil.

Phytoremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) using plant species in Iran

Plant-based remediation is a relatively new, efficient, and environmentally friendly technology, which can be promising for removing many contaminants like hydrocarbon pollutants. The main objectives of the current study were to investigate the effect of petroleum hydrocarbons with high initial concentration (about 3.5% by weight) on growth characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.), and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) as well as to evaluate the phytoremediation potential of the 2 mentioned plant species in highly contaminated, aged soil. In order to improve the condition of soil nutrients and also study the effect of soil amendment on plant growth, peat amendment was also considered. Soil samples were analyzed for TPH removal by GC-FID. Used plant species showed promising growth behavior in highly contaminated soil. A decrease of TPHs was found over the course of the experiment in all treatments. The maximum removal was obtained in tall fescue, in which tall fescue removed 96.3% of the initial TPHs from soil. Peat amendment showed positive effect on plant growth on contaminated soil. Results demonstrated that the 2 studied plant species were effective and promising in removing TPHs from contaminated, aged soil.

___

  • Adam G, Duncan H (2002) Influence of diesel fuel on seed germination. Environ Pollut 120: 363-370.
  • Anderson TA, Guthrie EA, Walton BT (1993) Bioremediation in the rhizosphere: plant roots and associated microbes clean contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 27: 2630-2636.
  • Aprill W, Sims, RC (1990) Evaluation of the use of prairie grasses for stimulating polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon treatment in soil. Chemosphere 20: 253-265.
  • ASTM (2000) Standard Test Method for Moisture, Ash and Organic Matter of Peat and Other Organic Soils, ASTM D2974-00.
  • Banks MK, Schwab P, Liu B, Kulakow P, Smith JS, Kim, R (2003) The effect of plants on the degradation and toxicity of petroleum contaminants in soil: A field assessment. Adv Biochem Eng Biotech 78: 75-96.
  • Bossert I, Bartha, R (1985) Plant growth in soils with a history of oily sludge disposal. Soil Sci 140: 75-77.
  • Chaineau CH, Morel JL, Oudot J (1997) Phytotoxicity and plant uptake of fuel oil hydrocarbons. J Environ Qual 26: 1478- 483.
  • Cunningham SD, Berti WR, Hung JW (1995) Phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Trends Biotechnol 13: 393-397.
  • Denys S, Rollin C, Guillot F, Baroudi H (2006) In-situ phytoremediation of PAHs contaminated soils following a bioremediation treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut 6: 299-315.
  • Dewis J, Freitas H (1984) Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil and Water Analysis, FAO Soil Bulletin 10. Oxford and IBH Publishing CO, New Delhi.
  • Eapen S, D’Souza, SF (2005) Prospects of genetic engineering of plants for phytoremediation of toxic metals. Biotechnol Adv 23: 97- 114.
  • Escalante-Espinosa, E, Gallegos-Martınez ME, Favela-Torres E, Gutierrez-Rojas M (2005) Improvement of the hydrocarbon phytoremediation rate by Cyperus laxus Lam. inoculated with a microbial consortium in a model system. Chemosphere 59: 405-413.
  • Gallegos-Martinez MG, Gomez-Trujillo AG, Gonzales LG, Montes OG, Gutierrez-Rojas M (2000) Diagnostic and resulting approached to restore petroleum-contaminated soil in a Mexican tropical swamp. Water Sci Technol 42: 377-384.
  • Huang XD, El-Alawi Y, Penrose DM, Glick BR and Greenberg BM (2004) A multi-process phytoremediation system for removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 130: 465-476.
  • Hutchinson SL, Banks MK, Schwab, AP (2001) Phytoremediation of aged petroleum sludge: Effect of inorganic fertilizer. J Environ Qual 30: 395-403.
  • Johnson DL, Anderson DR, McGrath SP (2005) Soil microbial response during the phytoremediation of a PAH contaminated soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 2334-2326.
  • Joner JE, Hirmann D, Szolar HJ, Todorovic OD, Leyval C, Loibner PA (2004) Priming effects on PAH degradation and ecotoxicity during a phytoremediation experiment. Environ Pollut 128: 429-435.
  • Joner JE, Leyval C, Colpaert VJ (2006) Ectomycorrhizas impede phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) both within and beyond the rhizosphere. Environ Pollut 142: 34-38.
  • McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (2003) Phytoremediation: Transformation and Control of Contaminants. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
  • Merkl N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C (2004) Phytoremediation in the tropics-the effect of crude oil on the growth of tropical plants. Biorem J 8: 177-184.
  • Merkl N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C (2005) Assessment of tropical grasses and legumes for phytoremediation of petroleumcontaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 165: 195-209. Mueller KE, Shann JR (2006) PAH dissipation in spiked soil: Impacts of bioavailability, microbial activity, and trees. Chemosphere 64: 1006-1014.
  • Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56: 15- 39.
  • Salanitro JP, Dorn PB, Huesemann MH, Moore KO, Rhodes IA, Kackson LM, Vipond TE, Western MM, Wisniewksi HL (1997) Crude oil hydrocarbon bioremediation and soil ecotoxicity assessment. Environ Sci Technol 31: 1769-1776.
  • Shahriari MH, Firrozabadi GS, Tehrani GM, Padidaran M (2006) The effect of mixed plants Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Fescue (Festuca arundinacea) on the phytoremediation of light crude oil in soil. Environ Sci 4: 33-40.
  • Singh OV, Jain RK (2003) Phytoremediation of toxic aromatic pollutants from soil. Appl Microbiol Biot 63: 128-135. Tahooni S (2000) Principles of foundation engineering. Pars Aain Press, Tehran.
  • Tesar M, Reichenauer GT, Sessitsch A (2002) Bacterial rhizosphere populations of black poplar and herbal plants to be used for phytoremediation of diesel fuel. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 1883- 1892.
  • USEPA (1998) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical Chemical Methods. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
  • Xu JG, Johnson RL (1997) Nitrogen dynamics in soils with different hydrocarbon contents planted to barley and field pea. Can J Soil Sci 77: 453-458.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK