Physiological characterization of Turkish bread wheat genotypes for resistance to late drought stress

Physiological characterization of Turkish bread wheat genotypes for resistance to late drought stress

A number of physiological traits have been proposed as selection criteria for late drought resistance and grain yieldimprovement in wheat. To characterize them in terms of late drought resistance, 64 bread wheat genotypes were evaluated for canopytemperature difference (CTD), leaf senescence rate (LSR), SPAD chlorophyll value, initial fluorescence (Fo), maximum fluorescence(Fm), variable fluorescence (Fv), maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), leaf ash content, and grain ash content in two fieldexperiments conducted in irrigated and late drought conditions during the 2011–12 and 2012–13 seasons in Erzurum, Turkey. Theexperiments were conducted in an 8 × 8 lattice design with two replicates. Significant variation was observed among the genotypes forall the traits. Late drought decreased the grain yield, CTD, SPAD, Fm, Fv, Fv/Fm, and leaf ash content but increased LSR and grain ashcontent. The drought sensitivity of the genotypes was determined by a ranking method based on 25 traits measured in the late droughtconditions. According to the rank-sum (RS) values of the genotypes, four genotypes were defined as resistant, 15 genotypes as mediumresistant, 34 genotypes as medium sensitive, and 11 genotypes as sensitive. Resistant genotypes Müfitbey and Dağdaş 94 produced thehighest grain yields in late drought conditions and appeared to be promising parents for the breeding of resistant cultivars. RS wasnegatively correlated with CTD, SPAD, Fm, Fv, and Fv/Fm, while it was positively correlated with LSR. For screening late droughtresistant genotypes, 15 days post anthesis (15DPA) is the optimum time for Fv, CTD, and SPAD measurements. The stepwise multiplelinear regression analysis indicated that the Fv15DPA, Fv25DPA, CTD15DPA, and SPAD15DPA could explain 75.2% of the total variation in RS.Therefore, the Fv15DPA, Fv25DPA, CTD15DPA, and SPAD15DPA traits can be used as selection criteria as a combination for the classifying ofwheat genotypes in terms of late drought resistance.

___

  • AACC (1995). Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 9th ed. St. Paul, MN, USA: AACC.
  • Araus JL, Amaro T, Voltas J, Nakkoul H, Nachit MM (1998). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection criterion for grain yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crop Res 55: 209-223.
  • Araus JL, Casadesus TJ, Asbati A, Nachit MM (2001). Basis of the relationship between ash content in the flag leaf and carbon isotope discrimination in kernels of durum wheat. Photosynthetica 39: 591-596.
  • Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002). Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann Bot 89: 925-940.
  • Balota M, Payne WA, Evett SR, Lazar MD (2007). Canopy temperature depression sampling to assess grain yield and genotypic differentiation in winter wheat. Crop Sci 47: 1518- 1529.
  • Balota M, Payne WA, Evett SR, Peters TR (2008). Morphological and physiological traits associated with canopy temperature depression in three closely related wheat lines. Crop Sci 48: 1897-1910.
  • Bogale A, Tesfaye K (2011). Relationships between kernel ash content, water use efficiency and yield in durum wheat under water deficit induced at different growth stages. Afr J Basic Appl Sci 3: 80-86.
  • Bogale A, Tesfaye K, Geleto T (2011). Morphological and physiological attributes associated to drought tolerance of Ethiopian durum wheat genotypes under water deficit condition. J Biodiversity Environ Sci 1: 22-36.
  • Chandrasekar V, Sairam RK, Srivastava GC (2000). Physiological and biochemical responses of hexaploid and tetraploid wheat to drought stress. J Agron Crop Sci 185: 219-227.
  • Fang JJ, Ma WY, Zhao XQ, He X, Li H, Tong YP, Li ZS (2012). Lower canopy temperature is associated with higher cytokinin concentration in the flag leaf of wheat. Crop Sci 52: 2743-2756.
  • Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT (1989). Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Ann Rev 40: 503-537.
  • Feng B, Yu H, Hu Y, Gao X, Gao J, Gao D, Zhang S (2009). The physiological characteristics of the low canopy temperature wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under simulated drought condition. Acta Physiol Plant 31: 1229-1235.
  • Foulkes MJ, Sylvester-Bradley R, Weightman R, Snape JW (2007). Identifying physiological traits associated with improved drought resistance in winter wheat. Field Crop Res 103: 11-24.
  • Guo P, Baum M, Varshney RK, Graner A, Grando S, Ceccarelli S (2008). QTL for chlorophyll and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in barley under post flowering drought. Euphytica 163: 203-214.
  • Gupta NK, Gupta S, Kumar A (2001). Effect of water stress on physiological attributes and their relationship with growth and yield of wheat cultivars at different stages. J Agron Crop Sci 186: 55-62.
  • Gutierrez-Rodriguez M, Reynolds MP, Estrada JAE, Gonzales MTR (2004). Association between canopy reflectance indices and yield and physiological traits in bread wheat under drought and well irrigated conditions. Aust J Agric Res 55: 1139-1147.
  • Hafsi M, Akhter J, Monneveux P (2007). Leaf senescence and carbon isotope discrimination in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) under severe drought conditions. Cereal Res Commun 35: 71-80.
  • Hafsi M, Hadji A, Guendouz A, Maamari K (2013). Relationships between flag leaf senescence and grain yield in durum wheat grown under drought conditions. J Agron 12: 69-77.
  • Hafsi M, Mechmeche W, Bouamama L, Djekoune A, Zaharieva M, Monneveux P (2000). Flag leaf senescence, as evaluated by numerical image analysis, and its relationship with yield under drought in durum wheat. J Agron Crop Sci 185: 275-280.
  • Harrel DM, Wilhelm WW, McMaster GS (1993). Scales: A computer program to convert among three developmental stage scales for wheat. Agron J 85: 758-763.
  • Kang MS (1988). A rank-sum method for selecting high yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res Commun 16: 113-115.
  • Kumar S, Sehgal SK, Kumar U, Prasad PVV, Joshi AK, Gill BS (2012). Genomic characterization of drought tolerance-related traits in spring wheat. Euphytica 186: 265-276.
  • Li P, Chen J, Wu P (2012). Evaluation grain yield and three physiological traits in 30 spring wheat genotypes across three irrigation regimes. Crop Sci 52: 110-121.
  • Lopes MS, Reynolds MP (2010). Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Funct Plant Biol 37: 147-156.
  • Lopes MS, Reynolds MP (2012). Stay green in spring wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) index. J Exp Bot 63: 3777-3788.
  • Loss SP, Siddique KHM (1994). Morphological and physiological traits associated with wheat yield increases in Mediterranean environments. Adv Agron 52: 229-276.
  • Ludlow M, Muchow R (1990). A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 43: 107-153.
  • Masle J, Farquhar GD, Wong SC (1992). Transpiration ratio and plant mineral content are related among genotypes of a range of species. Aust J Plant Physiol 19: 709-721.
  • Merah O, Deleens E, Souyris I, Monneveux P (2001). Ash content might predict carbon isotope discrimination and grain yield in durum wheat. New Phytol 149: 275-282.
  • Misra SC, Randive R, Rao VS, Sheshshayee MS, Serraj R, Monneveux P (2006). Relationship between carbon isotope discrimination, ash content and grain yield in wheat in the Peninsular Zone of India. J Agron Crop Sci 192: 352-362.
  • Misra SC, Shinde S, Geerts S, Rao VS, Monneveux P (2010). Can carbon isotope discrimination and ash content predict grain yield and water use efficiency in wheat? Agric Water Manag 97: 57-65.
  • Monneveux P, Jing R, Misra SC (2012). Phenotyping for drought adaptation in wheat using physiological traits. Fron Physiol 3: 1-12.
  • Monneveux P, Reynolds MP, Trethowan R, Santoyo HG, Pena RJ, Zapata F (2005). Relationship between grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination in bread wheat under four water regimes. Eur J Agron 22: 231-242.
  • Munns R, James RA, Sirault WRR, Furbank RT, Jones HG (2010). New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. J Exp Bot 61: 3499-3507.
  • Nikolaeva MK, Maevskaya SN, Shugaev AG, Bukhov NG (2010). Effect of drought on chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of three wheat cultivars varying in productivity. Russ J Plant Physiol 57: 87-95.
  • Ommen OE, Donnelly A, Vanhoutvin S, Oijen M, Manderscheid R (1999). Chlorophyll content of spring wheat flag leaves grown under elevated CO2 concentrations and other environmental stresses within the ‘ESPACE-wheat’ project. Eur J Agron 10: 197-203.
  • Öztürk A (1999). Drought resistance in bread wheat genotypes. Turk J Agric For 23: 1237-1247 (in Turkish with abstract in English).
  • Paknejad F, Nasri M, Moghadam HRT, Zahedi H, Alahmadi MJ (2007). Effects of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, chlorophyll content and grain yield of wheat cultivars. J Biol Sci 7: 841-847.
  • Pierre CS, Crossa J, Manes Y, Reynolds MP (2010). Gene action of canopy temperature in bread wheat under diverse environments. Theor Appl Genet 120: 1107-1117.
  • Sayar R, Khemira H, Kameli A, Mosbahi M (2008). Physiological tests as predictive for drought tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Agron Res 6: 79-90.
  • Sayed OH (2003). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in cereal crop research. Photosynthetica 41: 321-330.
  • Shah N, Paulsen GM (2003). Interaction of drought and high temperature on photosynthesis and grain filling of wheat. Plant Soil 257: 219-226.
  • Slapakauskas V, Ruzgas V (2005). Chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of different winter wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum L.). Agron Res 3: 203-209.
  • Tsialtas JT, Tokatlidis IS, Tamoutsidis E, Xynias I (2005). Relationship of grain yield with carbon isotope discrimination and ash content in lines derived from a bread wheat cultivar. J Agric Sci 143: 275-282.
  • Verma V, Foulkes MJ, Worland AJ, Sylvester-Bradley R, Caligari PDS, Snape JW (2004). Mapping quantitative trait loci for flag leaf senescence as a yield determinant in winter wheat under optimal and drought-stressed environments. Euphytica 135: 255-263.
  • Xiao YG, Qian ZG, Wu K, Liu JJ, Xia XC, Ji WQ, He ZH (2012). Genetic gains in grain yield and physiological traits of winter wheat in Shandong Province, China, from 1969 to 2006. Crop Sci 52: 44-56.
  • Zhu L, Liang ZS, Xu X, Li SH (2008). Relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and mineral content in wheat grown under three different water regimes. J Agron Crop Sci 194: 421-428.
  • Zhu L, Liang ZS, Xu X, Li SH, Monneveux P (2009). Evidences for the association between carbon isotope discrimination and grain yield-ash content and stem carbohydrate in spring wheat grown in Ningxia (Northwest China). Plant Sci 176: 758-767.