Nutrient uptake of peanut genotypes with different levels of drought tolerance under midseason drought

The objective of this study was to investigate the responses of peanut genotypes to midseason drought, regarding in particular nutrient uptakes and their correlations with biomass production and pod yield. The experiment was conducted during the dry seasons of 2011/12 and 2012/13. Five peanut genotypes with different levels of drought tolerance and 2 water regimes (well-watered and midseason drought) were laid out in a split-plot design with 4 replications. Midseason drought was imitated by stopping irrigation at 30 days after planting (DAP) and then rewatering at 60 DAP. The data were recorded for contents of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg in plant tissues, biomass production, yield components, and pod yield at harvest. The results showed that midseason drought significantly reduced the uptake of all nutrient elements. Peanut genotypes with higher levels of drought tolerance took up more nutrients than those with lower levels. The uptake of all nutrient elements contributed to biomass production, pod yield, and the number of pods per plant. ICGV 98305 was the best genotype with the highest uptakes of all observed nutrient elements.

Nutrient uptake of peanut genotypes with different levels of drought tolerance under midseason drought

The objective of this study was to investigate the responses of peanut genotypes to midseason drought, regarding in particular nutrient uptakes and their correlations with biomass production and pod yield. The experiment was conducted during the dry seasons of 2011/12 and 2012/13. Five peanut genotypes with different levels of drought tolerance and 2 water regimes (well-watered and midseason drought) were laid out in a split-plot design with 4 replications. Midseason drought was imitated by stopping irrigation at 30 days after planting (DAP) and then rewatering at 60 DAP. The data were recorded for contents of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg in plant tissues, biomass production, yield components, and pod yield at harvest. The results showed that midseason drought significantly reduced the uptake of all nutrient elements. Peanut genotypes with higher levels of drought tolerance took up more nutrients than those with lower levels. The uptake of all nutrient elements contributed to biomass production, pod yield, and the number of pods per plant. ICGV 98305 was the best genotype with the highest uptakes of all observed nutrient elements.

___

  • Amir Y, Benbelkacem T, Hadni L, Youyou A (2005). Effect of irrigation and fertilization on characteristics of peanut seeds cultivated near Tizi-Ouzou. J Agric Food Chem 4: 879–885.
  • Baligar VC, Fageria NK, He ZL (2001). Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32: 921–950.
  • Bricker AA (1989). MSTAT-C User’s Guide. East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University.
  • Broekaert JAC (2002). Analytical Atomic Spectrometry with Flames and Plasmas. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH.
  • Chang CS, Sung JM (2004). Nutrient uptake and yield responses of peanuts and rice to lime and fused magnesium phosphate in an acid soil. Field Crops Res 89: 319–325.
  • Chari KM, Gupta K, Prasad TG, Sastry KSS, Kumar MU (1986). Enhancement of water stress by calcium treatment in groundnut and cowpea plants subjected to moisture stress. Plant Soil 91: 109–114.
  • Coffelt TA, Hammons RO, Branch WD, Mozingo RW, Phipps PM, Smith JC, Lynch RE, Kvien CS, Ketring DL, Porter DM et al. (1985). Registration of Tifton 8 peanut germplasm. Crop Sci 25: 203.
  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1992). Calculation of Crop Water Requirements. Crop Water Requirements. Rome, Italy: FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper.
  • Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Clark RB (2002). Micronutrients in crop production. Adv Agron 77: 185–268.
  • Garg BK (2003). Nutrient uptake and management under drought: nutrient-moisture interaction. Curr Agr 27: 1–8.
  • Gascho GJ, Davis JG (1994). Mineral nutrition. In: Smartt J, editor. The Groundnut Crop. London, UK: Chapman and Hall, pp. 214–254.
  • Girdthai T, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A, Wongkaew S, Holbrook CC (2010). Associations between physiological traits for drought tolerance. Plant Breeding 129: 693–699.
  • Girdthai T, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Wongkaew S, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC (2012). Inheritance of the physiological traits for drought resistance under terminal drought conditions and genotypic correlations with agronomic traits in peanut. SABRAO J Breed Genet 44: 240–262.
  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Gunes A, Cicek N, Inal A, Alpaslan M, Eraslan F, Guneri E, Guzelordu T (2006). Genotypic response of chickpea (Cicer artietinum L.) cultivars to drought stress implemented at pre- and post-anthesis stages and its relations with nutrient uptake and efficiency. Plant Soil Environ 52: 368–376.
  • Huang B (2001). Nutrient accumulation and associated root characteristics in response to drought stress in Tall Fescue cultivars. Hort Sci 36: 148–152.
  • ICRISAT (2011). Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Hyderabad, India: International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
  • Jongrungklang N, Toomsan B, Vorasoot N, Jogloy S, Boote KJ, Hoogenboom G, Patanothai A (2012). Classification of root distribution patterns and their contributions to yield in peanut genotypes under mid-season drought stress. Field Crops Res 127: 181–190.
  • Kaewpradit W, Toomsan B, Cadisch G, Vityakon P, Limpinuntana V, Saenjan P, Jogloy S, Patanothai A (2009). Mixing groundnut residues and rice straw to improve rice yield and use efficiency. Field Crops Res 110: 130–138.
  • Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Upadhyaya HD, Krishna H, Chandra S, Vadez V, Serraj R (2005). Genetic variability of drought- avoidance root traits in the mini-core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 146: 213–222.
  • Khamparia NK (1996). Effect of increasing levels of phosphorus and potassium and their interaction on yield and nutrition of
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Genotypic variability for tuber yield, biomass, and drought tolerance in Jerusalem artichoke germplasm

Ruttanachira RUTTANAPRASERT, Poramate BANTERNG, Sanun JOGLOY, Nimitr VORASOOT, Thawan KESMALA, Rameshwar S. KANWAR, Carl Corley HOLBROOK, Aran PATANOTHAI

Screening of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars against root-lesion nematode species

Mehmet Ali SÖĞÜT, Fatma Gül GÖZ, Tufan ÖNAL, Zübeyir DEVRAN, Muhammet TONGUÇ

A highly effective nucleopolyhedrovirus against Malacosoma spp. (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) from Turkey: isolation, characterization, phylogeny, and virulence

İsmail DEMİR, Remziye NALÇACIOĞLU, Lida Mohammad GHOLİZAD, Zihni DEMİRBAĞ

The effects of land use and land cover changes (LULCC) in Kuseyr plateau of Turkey on erosion

Emre ÖZŞAHİN, Veli UYGUR

Macronutrient concentration and remobilization in spring wheat organs during grain filling

Murat TİRYAKİOĞLU, Mehmet YILDIRIM, Sema KARANLIK

Chloroplast DNA variation and pollen contamination in a Pinus brutia Ten. clonal seed orchard: implication for progeny performance in plantations

Behiye Banu BİLGEN, Nuray KAYA

Macronutrient concentration and remobilization in spring wheat organs during grain flling

Mehmet YILDIRIM, Murat TİRYAKİOĞLU, Sema KARANLIK

A highly efective nucleopolyhedrovirus against Malacosoma spp. (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) from Turkey: isolation, characterization, phylogeny, and virulence

Zihni DEMİRBAĞ, İsmail DEMİR, Remziye NALÇACIOĞLU, Lida GHOLİZAD MOHAMMAD

Biochemical and sensory evaluations of Turkish delight (lokum) enriched with black grape and sour cherry syrups

Ali BATU, Ali ARSLAN

Growth, biomass, carbon stocks, and sequestration in an age series of Populus deltoides plantations in Tarai region of central Himalaya

Gureveen ARORA, Sumit CHATURVEDI, Rajesh KAUSHAL, Ajeet NAIN, Salil TEWARI