Effects of climatic factors on grain vitreousness stability and heritability in durum wheat

Modern durum wheat breeding programs are becoming more oriented toward creation of not only high-yield cultivars but also high quality, with good stability for the trait of interest. Vitreousness of grain is associated with semolina granulation, color, and protein content; it is regarded as one of the most important characteristics in the grading industry, affecting the commercial value of the commodity. A set of 15 winter and facultative durum wheat genotypes was tested for grain vitreousness across 6 environments for 2 consecutive years. Three-way analysis of variance showed that genotype, location, and year contributed 4.1%, 20.6%, and 42.2% to the total sum of squares, respectively. Interaction terms, including genotype, contributed 6.1% to the total sum of squares, and location x year contributed 27.0%. Stability of grain vitreousness for the examined breeding lines and cultivars of durum wheat was shown by the site's regression. Broad-sense heritability of grain vitreousness was estimated to be 71%. Climatic variables were used for factorial regression modeling, and most of the interaction term for grain vitreousness was explained by mean temperatures in June (54.4%) and April (14.2%), and precipitation (14.4%) and sunshine hours (14.3%) in March. During the grain filling and grain ripening stages, the most influential climatic variables in explaining interaction were maximum temperature (43.4%), precipitation (30.9%), and sunshine hours (5.6%).

Effects of climatic factors on grain vitreousness stability and heritability in durum wheat

Modern durum wheat breeding programs are becoming more oriented toward creation of not only high-yield cultivars but also high quality, with good stability for the trait of interest. Vitreousness of grain is associated with semolina granulation, color, and protein content; it is regarded as one of the most important characteristics in the grading industry, affecting the commercial value of the commodity. A set of 15 winter and facultative durum wheat genotypes was tested for grain vitreousness across 6 environments for 2 consecutive years. Three-way analysis of variance showed that genotype, location, and year contributed 4.1%, 20.6%, and 42.2% to the total sum of squares, respectively. Interaction terms, including genotype, contributed 6.1% to the total sum of squares, and location x year contributed 27.0%. Stability of grain vitreousness for the examined breeding lines and cultivars of durum wheat was shown by the site's regression. Broad-sense heritability of grain vitreousness was estimated to be 71%. Climatic variables were used for factorial regression modeling, and most of the interaction term for grain vitreousness was explained by mean temperatures in June (54.4%) and April (14.2%), and precipitation (14.4%) and sunshine hours (14.3%) in March. During the grain filling and grain ripening stages, the most influential climatic variables in explaining interaction were maximum temperature (43.4%), precipitation (30.9%), and sunshine hours (5.6%).

___

  • Ahmad I, Muhammad F, Aurangzeb (2013). Breeding bread wheat for low phytic acid using full diallel crosses. Sarhad J Agric 29: 33–42.
  • Allard RW (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Annicchiarico P (2002). Defining adaptation strategies and yield- stability targets in breeding programmes. In: Kang MS, editor. Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding. New York, NY, USA: CAB International, pp. 365–385.
  • Baum M, Impiglia A, Ketata H, Nachit M (1995). Studies on some grain quality traits in durum wheat grown in Mediterranean environments. In: Di Fonzo N, Kaan F, Nachit M, editors. Durum Wheat Quality in the Mediterranean Region. Zaragoza, Spain: CIHEAM, pp. 181–187.
  • Bechtel DB, Abecassis J, Shewry PR, Evers AD (2009). Development, structure, and mechanical properties of the wheat grain. In: Khan K, Shewry PR, editors. Wheat Chemistry and Technology. 4th ed. St. Paul, MN, USA: AACC International, pp. 68–86.
  • Becker HC, Leon J (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101: 1–23.
  • Bilgin O, Baser I, Korkut KZ, Genctan T, Balkan A, Saglam N (2009). Variations for grain yield and milling value of durum wheat landraces and obsolete cultivars. Phillipp Agric Scientist 92: 25–32.
  • Bilgin O, Korkut KZ, Baser I, Daglioglu O, Ozturk I, Kahraman T, Balkan A (2010). Variation and heritability for some semolina characteristics and grain yield relations in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf). World J Agric Sci 6: 301–308.
  • Borghi B, Corbellini M, Minoia C, Palumbo M, di Fonzo N, Perenzin M (1997). Effects of Mediterranean climate on wheat bread- making quality. Eur J Agron 6: 145–154.
  • Budak H, Budak F (1998). The effect of vitreousness on 3-durum wheats (T. durum desf.) quality in Kahramanmaras region of Turkey. Anadolu J Aari 8: 127–135.
  • Correll R, Butler J, Spouncer L, Wrigley C (1994). The relationship between grain-protein content of wheat and barley and temperatures during grain filling. Aust J Plant Physiol 21: 869–873.
  • Crossa J, Cornelius PL (1997).  Sites regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar trial sites under heterogeneity of error variances. Crop Sci 37: 405–415.
  • Denis JB (1988). Two-way analysis using covariates. Statistics 19: 123–132.
  • Dexter EJ, Williams CP, Edwards MN, Martin GD (1988). The relationships between durum wheat vitreousness, kernel hardness and processing quality. J Cereal Sci 7: 169–181.
  • Dodig D, Stankovic S, Milicevic-Nikodijevic S (2003). Influence of drought on grain glassiness and protein content in durum wheat. J Sci Agric Res 64: 45–50.
  • Dodig D, Zoric M, Knezevic D, King SR, Surlan-Momirovic G (2008). Genotype × environment interaction for wheat yield in different drought stress conditions and agronomic traits suitable for selection. Aust J Agric Res 59: 536–545.
  • Dowell EF (2000). Differentiating vitreous and nonvitreous durum wheat kernels by using near-infrared spectroscopy. Cereal Chem 77: 155–158.
  • Edwards M (2010). Morphological features of wheat grain and genotype affecting flour yield. PhD, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
  • Epinat-Le Signor C, Dousse S, Lorgeou J, Denis JB, Bonhomme R, Carolo P, Charcosset A (2001). Interpretation of genotype × environment interactions for early maize hybrids over 12 years. Crop Sci 41: 663–669.
  • Falconer DS (1981). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. London, UK: Longman.
  • Hoseney RC (1986). Structure of cereals. In: Hoseney RC, editor. Principles of Cereal Sciences and Technology. St. Paul, MN, USA: AACC, pp. 1–33.
  • Jamieson PD, Porter JR., Wilson DR (1991). A test of the wheat simulation model ARCWHEAT1 on wheat crops in New Zealand. Field Crops Res 27: 337–350.
  • Kaluđerski G, Filipović N (1998). Methods of analysis grain quality. Novi Sad: University of Novi Sad.
  • Kang MS, Aggarwal VD, Chirwa RM (2005). Adaptability and stability of bean cultivars as determined via yield-stability statistic and GGE biplot analysis. J Crop Improv 15: 97–120.
  • Khalaf AS, Hassan AI, Nachit M, El-Saleh A (2005). Evaluation of grain quality properties of some Iraqi and ICARDA selected durum wheat cultivars. Mesopotamia J Agric 33: 1–9.
  • Korkut KZ, Bilgin O, Başer İ, Sağlam N (2007). Stability of grain vitreousness in durum wheat (Triticum durum L. Desf.) genotypes in the north-western region of Turkey. Turk J Agric For 31: 313–318.
  • Lin CS, Binns MR, Lefkovitch LP (1986). Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci 26: 894–900.
  • Magari R, Kang MS (1993). Genotype selection via a new yield stability statistic in maize yield trials. Euphytica 70: 105–111.
  • Marta AD, Grifoni D, Mancini M, Zipoli G, Orlandini S (2011). The influence of climate on durum wheat quality in Tuscany, Central Italy. Int J Biometeorol 55: 87–96.
  • Nair S, Ullrich SE, Blake TK, Cooper B, Griffey CA, Hayes PM, Hole DJ, Horsley RD, Obert DE, Smith KP, Muehlbauer GJ, Baik BK (2010). Variation in Kernel Hardness and Associated Traits in U.S. Barley Breeding Lines. Cereal Chem 87: 461–466.
  • Oweis T, Pala M, Ryan J (1999). Management alternatives for improved durum wheat production under supplemental irrigation in Syria. Europ J Agronomy 11: 255–266.
  • Paredes-Lopez O, Corravioubas-Alvarez M, Barquin-Carmona J (1985). Influence of nitrogen fertilization on the physicochemical and functional properties of bread wheats. Cereal Chem 62: 427–432.
  • Parish JA, Halse N (1968). Effects of light, temperature and the rate of desiccation on translucency in wheat grain. Aust J Agric Res 19: 365–372.
  • Rachon L, Szumilo G (2009). Yield of winter durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) lines in condition of different protection level of plants. Acta Sci Pol Agricultura 8: 15–22.
  • Rharrabti Y, García del Moral LF, Villegas D, Royo C (2003). Durum wheat quality in Mediterranean environments III. Stability and comparative methods in analysing G × E interaction. Field Crops Res 80: 141–146.
  • Rizza F, Badeck FW, Cattivelli L, Lidestri O, Di Fonzo N, Stanca AM (2004). Use of a water stress index to identify barley genotypes adapted to rainfed and irrigated conditions. Crop Sci 44: 2127– 2137.
  • Sakurai M, Furuki T, Akao K, Tanaka D, Nakahara Y, Kikawada T, Watanabe M, Okuda T (2008). Vitrification is essential for anhydrobiosis in an African chironornid, Polypedilum vanderplanki. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105: 5093–5098.
  • Salinger MJ, Jamieson PD, Johnstone JV (1995). Climate variability and wheat baking quality. New Zealand J Crop Hortic Sci 23: 289–298.
  • Smith GP, Gooding MJ (1999). Models of wheat grain quality considering climate, cultivar and nitrogen effects. Agric For Meteor 94: 159–170.
  • Stoeva I (2012). Technological evaluation of new common winter wheat lines developed at Dobrudzha Agricultural Institute- General Toshevo. Agric Sci Techn 4: 10–14.
  • Sudaric A, Simic D, Vrataric M (2006). Characterization of genotype by environment interactions in soybean breeding programmes of southeast Europe. Plant Breeding 125: 191–194.
  • Taghouti M, Gaboun F, Nsarellah N, Rhrib R, El-Haila M, Kamar M, Abbad- Andaloussi F, Udupa SM (2010). Genotype × environment interaction for quality traits in durum wheat cultivars adapted to different environments African J Biotech 9: 3054–3062.
  • Van Eeuwijk FA, Denis JB, Kang MS (1996). Incorporating additional information on genotypes and environments in models for two-way genotype by environment tables. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG Jr editors. Genotype by environment interaction: new perspectives. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, pp. 15–49.
  • Voltas J, López-Córcoles H, Borrás G (2005). Use of biplot analysis and factorial regression for the investigation of superior genotypes in multi-environment trials. Europ J Agronomy 22: 309–324.
  • Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci 40: 597–605.
  • Zalewski D, Bojarczuk J (2004). Estimation of quantitative character variability in winter durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Zesz Probl Post Nauk Rol 497: 637–644.
  • Žilić S, Hadži-Tašković Šukalović V, Srebrić M, Dodig D, Maksimović M, Mladenović-Drinić S, Crevar M (2009). Chemical compositions as quality parameters of ZP soybean and wheat genotypes Genetika-Belgrade 41: 297–308.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Genetic variation for growth and yield parameters in half-sib progenies of Melia azedarach (Linn.)

Himanshu MEENA, Ashok KUMAR, Rajni SHARMA, Sanjeev Kumar CHAUHAN, Krishana Mohan BHARGAVA

Concentration and detection of tobacco etch virus from irrigation water using real-time PCR

Wei CHEN, Jin DAI, Huawei ZHANG, Honghong JIAO, Julong CHENG, Yunfeng WU

Genotypic variability for tuber yield, biomass, and drought tolerance in Jerusalem artichoke germplasm

Ruttanachira RUTTANAPRASERT, Poramate BANTERNG, Sanun JOGLOY, Nimitr VORASOOT, Thawan KESMALA, Rameshwar S. KANWAR, Carl Corley HOLBROOK, Aran PATANOTHAI

Field performance of Trichoderma species against wilt disease complex of chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia solani

Mujeebur Rahman KHAN, Shabbir ASHRAF, Farahnaz RASOOL, Khalid Mahmood SALATI

Evaluating the impact of land use uncertainty on the simulated streamflow and sediment yield of the Seyhan River basin using the SWAT model

Ashraf EL-SADEK, Ahmet İRVEM

Growth, biomass, carbon stocks, and sequestration in an age series of Populus deltoides plantations in Tarai region of central Himalaya

Gureveen ARORA, Sumit CHATURVEDI, Rajesh KAUSHAL, Ajeet NAIN, Salil TEWARI

Macronutrient concentration and remobilization in spring wheat organs during grain filling

Murat TİRYAKİOĞLU, Mehmet YILDIRIM, Sema KARANLIK

The efects of land use and land cover changes (LULCC) in Kuseyr plateau of Turkey on erosion

Veli UYGUR, Emre ÖZŞAHİN

Screening of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars against root-lesion nematode species

Mehmet Ali SÖĞÜT, Fatma Gül GÖZ, Tufan ÖNAL, Zübeyir DEVRAN, Muhammet TONGUÇ

Dry matter yield, feeding value, and antioxidant activity in Mediterranean chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) germplasm

Giovanna PILUZZA, Leonardo SULAS, Simonetta BULLITTA