Identification and characterization of hypovirus-infected Cryphonectria parasitica isolates from biological control plots in İzmir, Kütahya, and Sinop

Identification and characterization of hypovirus-infected Cryphonectria parasitica isolates from biological control plots in İzmir, Kütahya, and Sinop

In a pilot study, a biological control with hypovirus-infected Cryphonectria parasitica was applied in 3 study plots in Turkey,in June 2013. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of the applied biological control by verifying the establishment of thereleased hypovirus (CHV-1) strains using molecular markers. C. parasitica isolates were sampled from cankers at 3 different time points:before the biological control treatments (April 2013), and 5 months (October 2013) and 11 months (May 2014) after the treatment. Intotal, 255 C. parasitica isolates were recovered and characterized. First, the culture morphology and vegetative compatibility type ofthese isolates were assessed. Next, the presence of hypoviruses in white isolates was checked by RNA extraction and subsequent RTPCR. Finally, a sequence analysis was performed to compare the hypoviruses to the released biological control hypoviruses by examiningsingle nucleotide markers and reconstructing their phylogenetic relationship. The study sites in İzmir and Kütahya were found to befree of hypoviruses prior to the biological control, whereas in Sinop, the occurrence of hypoviruses of the Italian subtype was observed.Reisolations of the treated cankers and subsequent molecular analysis resulted in the detection of the released biocontrol hypovirusstrains in all 3 study sites. The reisolated hypoviruses in İzmir and Kütahya originated from either one of the released biocontrol strains.In Sinop, both natural and artificially introduced hypoviruses were detected. Our study showed that the released biological controlhypoviruses persisted in the treated cankers, which is promising for the biological control of chestnut blight in Turkey

___

  • Akilli S, Katircioglu YZ, Maden S (2009). Vegetative compatibility types of Cryphonectria parasitica, causal agent of chestnut blight, in the Black Sea region of Turkey. Forest Pathology 39: 390-396.
  • Akıllı S, Serçe CU, Katırcıoğlu YZ, Maden S, Rigling D (2013). Characterization of hypovirulent isolates of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica from the Marmara and Black Sea regions of Turkey. European Journal of Plant Pathology 135: 323-334.
  • Allemann C, Hoegger P, Heiniger U, Rigling D (1999). Genetic variation of Cryphonectria hypoviruses (CHV1) in Europe assessed using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers. Molecular Ecology 8: 843-854.
  • Anagnostakis SL (1988). Cryphonectria parasitica, cause of chestnut blight. Advances in Plant Pathology 6: 123-136.
  • Bryner SF, Rigling D (2011). Temperature-dependent genotypeby-genotype interaction between a pathogenic fungus and its hyperparasitic virus. The American Naturalist 177: 65-74.
  • Bryner SF, Rigling D, Brunner PC (2012). Invasion history and demographic pattern of Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 across European populations of the chestnut blight fungus. Ecology and Evolution 2: 3227-3241.
  • Çeliker NM, Onoğur E (2001). Evaluation of hypovirulent isolates of Cryphonectria parasitica for the biological control of chestnut blight. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 76: 378-382.
  • Çeliker NM, Kaplan C, Onoğur E, Çetinel B, Poyraz D, Uysal A (2017). Natural dissemination of hypovirulent Cryphonectria parasitica strain used for biological control of chestnut blight. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 41: 278-284.
  • Chen BS, Nuss DL (1999). Infectious cDNA clone of hypovirus CHV-1-Euro7: a comparative virology approach to investigate virus-mediated hypovirulence of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Journal of Virology 73: 985-992.
  • Choi GH, Nuss DL (1992). Hypovirulence of chestnut blight fungus conferred by an infectious viral cDNA. Science 257: 800-803.
  • Delen N (1975). Distribution and the biology of chestnut blight (Endothia parasitica) (Murrill) Anderson and Anderson. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology 4: 93-113.
  • Erincik O, Doken MT, Acikgoz S, Ertan E (2008). Characterization of Cryphonectria parasitica isolates collected from Aydin province in Turkey. Phytoparasitica 36: 249-259.
  • FAO (2014). Management of Chestnut Blight and Increased Capacity for Improving Forest Health and Vitality. TCP / TUR / 615676 final report.
  • Gobbin D, Hoegger PJ, Heiniger U, Rigling D (2003). Sequence variation and evolution of Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 (CHV1) in Europe. Virus Research 97: 39-46.
  • Grente MJ (1965). Les formes hypovirulentes d’Endothia parasitica et les espoirs de lutte contre le chancre du châtaignier. Académie d’agriculture de France 51: 1033-1036.
  • Gürer M, Ottaviani MP, Cortesi P (2001a). Genetic diversity of subpopulations of Cryphonectria parasitica in two chestnutgrowing regions In Turkey. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 76: 383-386.
  • Gürer M, Turchetti T, Biagioni P, Maresi G (2001b). Assessment and characterisation of Turkish hypovirulent isolates of Cryphonectria parasitica (Murr.) Barr. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 40: 265-275.
  • Heiniger U, Rigling D (1994). Biological control of chestnut blight in Europe. Annual Review of Phytopathology 32: 581-599.
  • Hillman BI, Suzuki N (2004). Viruses of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Advances in Virus Research 63: 423- 472.
  • Hoegger PJ, Heiniger U, Holdenrieder O, Rigling D (2003). Differential transfer and dissemination of hypovirus and nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of a hypovirus-infected Cryphonectria parasitica strain after introduction into a natural population. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69: 3767-3771.
  • Kimura M (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120.
  • Milgroom MG, Cortesi P (1999). Analysis of population structure of the chestnut blight fungus based on vegetative incompatibility genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 10518-10523.
  • Milgroom MG, Cortesi P (2004). Biological control of chestnut blight with hypovirulence: a critical analysis. Annual Review of Phytopathology 42: 311-338.
  • Nuss DL (2005). Hypovirulence: mycoviruses at the fungal-plant interface. Nature Reviews Microbiology 3: 632-642.
  • Orman Genel Müdürlüğü (2014). Kestane hastalıklarına karşı standart çalışma yöntemleri. 62 s. ISBN 978-605-4610-71-6 (in Turkish).
  • Peever TL, Liu YC, Cortesi P, Milgroom MG (2000). Variation in tolerance and virulence in the chestnut blight fungus-hypovirus interaction. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66: 4863-4869.
  • Perlerou C, Diamandis S (2010). Spread of introduced hypovirulence vs. natural hypovirulence in chestnut blight. Acta Horticulturae 866: 393-398.
  • Prospero S, Rigling D (2013). Chestnut blight. In: Gonthier P, Nicolotti G, editors. Infectious Forest Diseases. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 318-339.
  • Prospero S, Rigling D (2016). Using molecular markers to assess the establishment and spread of a mycovirus applied as a biological control agent against chestnut blight. BioControl 61: 313-323.
  • Rigling D, Heiniger U, Hohl HR (1989). Reduction of laccase activity in dsRNA-containing hypovirulent strains of Cryphonectria (Endothia) parasitica. Phytopathology 79: 219-223.
  • Rigling D, Prospero S (2018). Cryphonectria parasitica, the causal agent of chestnut blight: invasion history, population biology and disease control. Molecular Plant Pathology 19: 7-12.
  • Robin C, Anziani C, Cortesi P (2000). Relationship between biological control, incidence of hypovirulence, and diversity of vegetative compatibility types of Cryphonectria parasitica in France. Phytopathology 90: 730-737.
  • Robin C, Heiniger U (2001). Chestnut blight in Europe: diversity of Cryphonectria parasitica, hypovirulence and biocontrol. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 76: 361-367.
  • Robin C, Lanz S, Soutrenon A, Rigling D (2010). Dominance of natural over released biological control agents of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica in south-eastern France is associated with fitness related traits. Biological Control 53: 55-61.
  • Van Alfen NK, Jaynes RA, Anagnostakis SL, Day PR (1975). Chestnut blight-biological control by transmissible hypovirulence in Endothia parasitica. Science 189: 890-891.