Genetic basis of variation for within-boll yield components in cotton

Genetic basis of variation for within-boll yield components in cotton

Cotton productivity on a per-hectare basis is low in Pakistan. As boll is the basis for seed cotton yield, within-boll yield components can potentially serve as the most basic determinants of cotton productivity on a per unit land area basis. Before attempting the improvement of any trait, it is necessary to know the genetic mechanism lying behind its inheritance. The current study aimed to estimate the genetic basis of within-boll yield components in cotton. The research trials were conducted at the research area of the Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Epistasis was found to be involved in all traits such as average boll weight, seed number boll 1, seed mass boll 1, lint mass boll 1, lint mass seed 1, seed index, seed volume 100-seeds 1, seed density, and surface area seed 1. Additive variance was greater in magnitude than dominance variance for traits such as lint mass boll 1 and lint mass seed 1 in cross I and for seed number boll 1, seed mass boll 1, and lint mass seed 1 in cross II. The magnitude of both variances was nearly equal for seed density in cross I and seed number boll 1 in cross II. While dominance variance was found to be greater in magnitude than additive variance for all the remaining traits in both crosses, the degree of dominance √(H/D) in cross I was partial for lint mass boll 1 and lint mass seed 1. We found complete dominance for seed density and overdominance for the remaining traits. While in cross II the degree of dominance was partial for seed mass boll 1 and lint mass seed 1, complete dominance was found for seed number boll 1 and overdominance for the remaining traits.

___

  • Alford BB, Liepa GU, Vanbeber AD (1996). Cotton protein: what does the future hold? Plant Food Human Nutr 49: 1–11.
  • Ali MA, Awan SI (2009). Inheritance pattern of seed and lint traits in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Inter J Agric Biol 11: 44–48.
  • Basal H, Unay A, Canavar O, Yavas I (2009). Combining ability for fibre quality parameters and within-boll yield components in intraspecific and interspecific cotton populations. Span J Agric Res 7: 364–374.
  • Bednarz CW, Nichols RL, Brown SM (2006). Plant density modifications of cotton within-boll yield components. Crop Sci 46: 2076–2080.
  • Bednarz CW, Nichols RL, Brown SM (2007). Within-boll yield components of high yielding cotton cultivars. Crop Sci 47: 2108–2112.
  • Bhatti MA, Azhar FM, Alvi AW, Ayub M (2006). Triple test cross analysis of seed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and its components grown in salinized conditions. Inter J Agric Biol 8: 820–823.
  • Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1952). Estimation of average dominance of genes. In: Gowen JW, editor. Heterosis. 1st ed. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State College Press, pp. 494–516.
  • Coyle GG, Smith CW (1997). Combining ability for within-boll yield components in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 37: 1118–1122.
  • Culp TW, Harrell DC (1973). Breeding methods for improving yield and fiber quality of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Crop Sci 13: 686–689.
  • Culp TW, Harrell DC (1975). Influence of lint percentage, boll size and seed size on lint yield of upland cotton with high fiber strength. Crop Sci 15: 741–746.
  • Green C, Culp TW (1990). Simultaneous improvement of yield, fiber quality and yarn strength in upland cotton. Crop Sci 30: 66–69.
  • Harten AM (1998). Mutation Breeding: Theory and Practical Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hodson EA (1920). Lint Frequency in Cotton with a Method for Determination. Fayetteville, AR, USA: University of Arkansas.
  • Kearsey MJ, Jinks JL (1968). A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. Heredity 3: 403–409.
  • Ketata H, Smith EL, Edwards LH, McNew RW (1976). Detection of epistatic, additive and dominance variation in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.). Crop Sci 16: 1–4.
  • Kiani G, Nematzadeh GA, Kazemitabar SK, Alishah O (2007). Combining ability in cotton cultivars for agronomic traits. Inter J Agric Biol 9: 521–522.
  • Melchinger AE, Utz HF, Piepho HP, Zeng ZB, Schön CC (2007). The role of epistasis in the manifestation of heterosis: a systemsoriented approach. Genetics 177: 1815–1825.
  • Ministry of Finance (2012–2013). Pakistan Economic Survey. Islamabad, Pakistan: Ministry of Finance.
  • Patel UG, Patel JC, Patel PG, Vadodaria KV, Sutaria CM (1997). Combining ability analysis for seed cotton yield and mean fibre length in upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Indian J Genet Pl Br 57: 315–318.
  • Pavasia MJ, Shukla PT, Patel UG (1999). Combining ability analysis over environments for fibre characters in upland cotton. Indian J Genet Pl Br 59: 77–81.
  • Rahman S, Khan MA, Khan MA (1989). Estimation of heterosis and heterobeltiosis for yield and its components in various crosses of cotton. Pak J Agric Res 10: 5–9.
  • Rathore KS, Sunilkumar G, Cantrell RG, Hague S (2008). Transgenic sugar, tuber and fibre crops. In: Kole C, Hall TC, editors.
  • Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants. Oxford, UK: WileyBlackwell, pp. 545–554.
  • Schouten HJ,  Krens FA, Jacobsen E (2006). Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants: international regulations for genetically modified organisms should be altered to exempt cisgenesis. EMBO Rep 7: 747–844.
  • Schwartz BM, Smith CW (2008). Genetic gain in yield potential of upland cotton under varying plant densities. Crop Sci 48: 601–605.
  • Smith CW, Coyle GG (1997). Association of fiber quality parameters and within-boll yield components in upland cotton. Crop Sci 37: 1775–1779.
  • Stebbins CL (1950). Variation and Evolution in Plants. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Tang B, Jenkins JN, McCarty JC, Watson CE (1993). F2 hybrids of host plant germplasm and cotton cultivars: II. Heterosis and combining ability for fiber properties. Crop Sci 33: 706–710.
  • Tang F, Xiao W (2013). Genetic effects and heterosis of within-boll yield components in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Euphytica 194: 41–51.
  • Tripathi ID, Singh M (1983). Triple test cross analysis in three barley populations under saline alkali soil conditions. J Agr Sci 101: 317–321.
  • USDA (2013). Foreign Agriculture Service. World Agricultural Production. Circular Series WAP 12–13. Washington, DC, USA: USDA.
  • Worley S, Culp TW, Harrell DC (1974). The relative contributions of yield components to lint yield of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Euphytica 23: 399–403.