Generative and fruit quality characteristics of primocane fruiting red raspberry cultivars

Eight primocane fruiting red raspberry cultivars grown at the Experimental station "Radmilovac", a collective raspberry orchard of the Faculty of Agriculture, Belgrade University, were harvested in 2008 and 2009. The cultivars evaluated were 'Autumn Bliss', 'Lyulin', 'Polana', 'Polka', 'Himbo Top', 'Ruby', 'Rossana', and 'Heritage'. All cultivars were evaluated for their standard parameters of productivity (number of fruiting laterals and fruit per primocane, both yield per primocane and per meter of hedgerow) and fruit quality (fruit weight, number of drupelets per fruit, soluble solids content, and titratable acidity), and also of nutritional value (Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) and Total Phenolics (TPH)). The cultivars differed in terms of generative characteristics in both experimental years. In the 1st studied year, 'Rossana' expressed the lowest values of all generative characteristics, whereas 'Heritage' yielded much higher per primocane and meter of hedgerow (107.2 g and 4.0 kg, respectively). An increase of cropping potential in all studied cultivars was recorded in the 2nd year of the experiment. A similar trend was observed with fruit weight values, although large differences were also found among the cultivars. The highest number of drupelets per fruit as well as the largest fruit in 2009 (4.6 g) was found in 'Polka'. 'Polka' also exhibited the highest level of soluble solids content in 2009 (14.4%), followed by 'Rossana' (14.2%). It was found that raspberry cultivars with the smallest fruit size ('Rossana' and 'Autumn Bliss') showed the highest nutritional value expressed through the highest TPH and TAC levels. However, some of the cultivars represented here may satisfy both producers' demands and contribute to the improvement of consumers' health.

Generative and fruit quality characteristics of primocane fruiting red raspberry cultivars

Eight primocane fruiting red raspberry cultivars grown at the Experimental station "Radmilovac", a collective raspberry orchard of the Faculty of Agriculture, Belgrade University, were harvested in 2008 and 2009. The cultivars evaluated were 'Autumn Bliss', 'Lyulin', 'Polana', 'Polka', 'Himbo Top', 'Ruby', 'Rossana', and 'Heritage'. All cultivars were evaluated for their standard parameters of productivity (number of fruiting laterals and fruit per primocane, both yield per primocane and per meter of hedgerow) and fruit quality (fruit weight, number of drupelets per fruit, soluble solids content, and titratable acidity), and also of nutritional value (Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) and Total Phenolics (TPH)). The cultivars differed in terms of generative characteristics in both experimental years. In the 1st studied year, 'Rossana' expressed the lowest values of all generative characteristics, whereas 'Heritage' yielded much higher per primocane and meter of hedgerow (107.2 g and 4.0 kg, respectively). An increase of cropping potential in all studied cultivars was recorded in the 2nd year of the experiment. A similar trend was observed with fruit weight values, although large differences were also found among the cultivars. The highest number of drupelets per fruit as well as the largest fruit in 2009 (4.6 g) was found in 'Polka'. 'Polka' also exhibited the highest level of soluble solids content in 2009 (14.4%), followed by 'Rossana' (14.2%). It was found that raspberry cultivars with the smallest fruit size ('Rossana' and 'Autumn Bliss') showed the highest nutritional value expressed through the highest TPH and TAC levels. However, some of the cultivars represented here may satisfy both producers' demands and contribute to the improvement of consumers' health.

___

  • Ağaoğlu YS, Eyduran SP (2006) Raspberry, blackberry and currant’s usefulness in terms of human health. Res J Agric Biol Sci 2: 314-315.
  • Anttonen MJ, Karjalainen RO (2005) Environmental and genetic variation of phenolic compounds in red raspberry. J Food Compos Anal 18: 759-769.
  • Arnao MB, Cano A, Acosta M (1999) Methods to measure the antioxidant activity in plant material. A comparative discussion. Free Rad Res 32: 89-96.
  • Benvenuti S, Pellati F, Melegari M, Bertelli D (2004) Polyphenols, anthocyanins, ascorbic acid, and radical scavenging activity of Rubus, Ribes, and Aronia. J Food Sci 69: 164-169.
  • Bononi M, Andreoli G, Granelli G, Eccher T, Tateo F (2006) “Cyanidin volumetric index” and “chromaticity coordinates ratio” to characterize red raspberry (Rubus idaeus). Internat J Food Sci Nutr 57: 369-375.
  • Danek J (2002) ‘Polka’ and ‘Pokusa’ – new primocane fruiting raspberry cultivars from Poland. Acta Hort 585: 197-198.
  • Eyduran SP, Ağaoğlu YS (2006) A preliminary examination regarding ten raspberry cultivars. Res J Agric Biol Sci 2: 375-379.
  • Eyduran SP, Agaoglu YS, Eyduran E, Ozdemir T (2007) Comparison of some raspberry cultivars’ herbal features by repeated completed design statistic technique. Pak J Biol Sci 10: 1270- 1275.
  • Eyduran SP, Eyduran E, Agaoglu YS (2008) Estimation of fruit weight by cane traits for various raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) cultivars. Afr J Biotechnol 7: 3044-3052.
  • Gercekcioglu R (2008) Cane characteristics of ‘Cola II’ red raspberry as aff ected by application of nitrogen fertilizers and organic manure. J Appl Biol Sci 2: 81-83.
  • Gwozdecki J (2004) Raspberry production in Poland. J Pomol 38: 245-249.
  • Halvorsen BL, Holte K, Myhrstad MCW, Barikmo I, Hvattum E, Fagertun RS (2002) A systematic screening of total antioxidants in dietary plants. J Nutr 132: 461-471.
  • Jennings DL, Daubeny HA, Moore JN (1990) Blackberry and raspberry (Rubus). In: Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nuts crops I. (Eds. JN Moore, JR Bollington). Int. Society for HortScience. Wageningen, pp. 331-389.
  • Kafk as E, Özgen M, Özoğul Y, Türemiş N (2008) Phytochemical and fatty acid profi le of selected red raspberry cultivars: A comparative study. J Fruit Quality 31: 67-78.
  • Knight V (2004) Rubus breeding worldwide and the raspberry breeding programme at Horticultural Research International, East Malling. J Pomol 38: 23-38.
  • Milutinović МD, Nikolić M, Milivojević Ј, Мilutinović ММ, İaković G (2008) Growing primocane raspberry cultivars in Serbia. Acta Hort 777: 443-446.
  • Milivojević J (2008) Pomological and antioxidant properties of small fruits. PhD Dissertation. University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, p. 154.
  • Moore PP, Perkins Veazie P, Weber CA, Howard L (2008) Environmental eff ect on antioxidant content of ten raspberry cultivars. Acta Hort 777: 499-504.
  • Nikolić M, Ivanović М, Milenković S, Milivojević Ј, Milutinović М (2008) Th e State and prospects of raspberry production in Serbia. Acta Hort 777: 243-250.
  • Ochmian I, Skupień K (2008) Comparison of fi eld performance, fruit fi rmness, and nutritional value of yellow- and red-fruit polish raspberry cultivars. EJPAU 11: 19.
  • Pantelidis GE, Vasilakakis M, Manganaris GA, Diamantidis Gr (2007) Antioxidant capacity, phenol, anthocyanin and ascorbic acid contents in raspberries, blackberries, red currants, gooseberries and Cornelian cherries. Food Chem 102: 777- 783.
  • Plessi M, Bertelli D, Albasini A (2007) Distribution of metals and phenolic compounds as a criterion to evaluate variety of berries and related jams. Food Chem 100: 419-427.
  • Proteggente AR, Pannala AS, Paganga G, Van Buren L, Wagner E, Wiseman S, Van De Put F, Dacombe C, Rice-Evans CA (2002) Th e antioxidant activity of regularly consumed fruit and vegetables refl ects their phenolic and vitamin C composition. Free Radic Res 36: 217-233.
  • Remberg SF (2006) Studies of antioxidant activity in fruits and berries. Eff ects of cultivars and postharvest condition. PhD Dissertation. Norwegian University of Life Science, p. 11.
  • Scalzo J, Politi A, Pellegrini N, Mezzeti B, Battino M (2005) Plant genotype aff ects total antioxidant capacity and phenolic contents in fruit. Nutrition 21: 207-213.
  • Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic – phosphotungstic acid reagents. Amer J Enol Viticult 16: 144-158.
  • Wang SY, Lin HS (2000) Antioxidant activity in fruits and leaves of blackberry, raspberry and strawberry varies with cultivar and developmental stage. J Agric Food Chem 48: 140-146.
  • Weber C, Liu RH (2002) Antioxidant capacity and anticancer properties of red raspberry. Acta Hort 585: 451-457.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Stem reserve accumulation and mobilization in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as aff ected by sowing date and N – P – K levels under Mediterranean conditions

Amir AYNEHBAND, Maryam VALIPOOR, Esfandiar FATEH

Effect of acid scarification and cold moist stratification on the germination of Cercis siliquastrum L. seeds

Elias PIPINIS, Elias MILIOS, Pavlos SMIRIS, Christos GIOUMOUSIDIS

Generative and fruit quality characteristics of primocane fruiting red raspberry cultivars

Jasminka M. MILIVOJEVIC, Mihailo D. NIKOLIC, Jelena J. DRAGISIC MAKSIMOVIC, Dragan D. RADIVOJEVIC

Effects of different material coatings on the wearing of plowshares in soil tillage

Muammer NALBANT, A. Tufan PALALI

Stem reserve accumulation and mobilization in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as affected by sowing date and N – P – K levels under Mediterranean conditions

Amir AYNEHBAND, Maryam VALIPOOR, Esfandiar FATEH

Interactions between rural migration and land use change in the forest villages in the Gökçay Watershed

Ceyhun GÖL, Sezgin ÖZDEN, Hüseyin YILMAZ

ABA-mediated proline synthesis in cowpea leaves exposed to water deficiency and rehydration

Roberto Cezar Lobo da COSTA, Allan Klynger da Silva LOBATO

Total carbon stocks and carbon accumulation in living tree biomass in forest ecosystems of Turkey

Doğanay TOLUNAY

Effect of sowing time on grain yield, oil content, and fatty acids in rapeseed (Brassica napus subsp. oleifera)

Hakan TURHAN, Muhammet Kemal GÜL, Cem Ömer EGESEL, Fatih KAHRIMAN

Rooting behaviour, polyphenol oxidase activity, and biochemical changes in grape rootstocks at different growth stages

Ramhari G. SOMKUWAR, Devanand D. BONDAGE, Manisha S. SURANGE, Sahadeo D. RAMTEKE