Evaluation of effects of water-saving superabsorbent polymer on corn (Zea mays L.) yield and phosphorus fertilizer efficiency

Evaluation of effects of water-saving superabsorbent polymer on corn (Zea mays L.) yield and phosphorus fertilizer efficiency

There is growing interest in using a reduced rate of mineral fertilizer along with water-saving superabsorbent polymer (WSAP) for field crop production in arid and semiarid regions of the world. The overall objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of hydrogel applications on the phosphorus fertilizer efficiency parameter, yield, and selected physiological properties of corn (Zea mays L.) grown at different levels of water deficiency in greenhouse conditions. The experimental design consisted of 3 completely randomized blocks in a factorial arrangement, with 9 hydrogel doses (0%, 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.08%, 0.12%, 0.2%, 0.4%, and 0.6%), 4 phosphorus fertilizer doses (0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha 1), and 4 water deficiency levels (50%, 65%, 80%, and 100%). Overall, 432 pots were used in this study. We found that the irrigation interval of 0.0% WSAP (control) application treatment at water deficient conditions (WDC 50%) was 6 days, although this value could be increased to 11 days with 0.4% WSAP application treatment. The highest yield was obtained from 0.40% WSAP with 240 kg ha 1 P application dose at 35% deficient irrigation conditions according to leaf relative water content, the chlorophyll reading value of corn plants, and P fertilizer efficiency parameters such as agronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency, use efficiency, and apparent recovery efficiency values. These findings suggest that the application of 0.40% WSAP with 240 kg ha 1 P and economic soil management practice could provide an efficient corn production operation in drought-affected regions such as eastern Turkey and other areas with similar ecologies.

___

  • Ahmadi A, Baker DA (2000). Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations of photosynthesis under water stress conditions in wheat plant. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31: 813-825.
  • Akhter J, Mahmood K, Malik KA, Mardan A, Ahmad M, Iqbal MM (2004). Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and grainling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant Soil Environ 50: 463-469.
  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome, Italy: FAO.
  • Blodgett AM, Beattis DJ, White JW, Elliot GC (1993). Hydrophilic polymers and wetting agents affect absorption and evaporative water loss. HortScience 28: 633-635.
  • Bremner JM (1996). Nitrogen-total. In: Bartels JM, Bigham JM, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part III. Chemical Methods. 2nd ed. Madison WI, USA: ASA and SSSA Publisher, pp. 1085- 1121.
  • Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL (2000). Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. 1st ed. Rockville, MD, USA: Wiley, pp. 52-108.
  • Filintas TA (2003). Cultivation of Maize in Greece: Increase and Growth, Management, Output Yield and Environmental Sequences. Mitilini, Greece: University of the Aegean (in Greek with English abstract).
  • Ghooshchi F, Seilsepour M, Jafari P (2008). Effects of water stress on yield and some agronomic traits of maize SC 301. AmericanEurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 4: 302-305.
  • Hillel D (1971). Soil and Water: Physical Principles and Processes. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.
  • Huttermann A, Zommorodi M, Reise K (1999). Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedlings subjected to drought. Soil and Tillage Research 50: 295-304.
  • Islam MR, Eneji AE, Hu YG, Li J (2009). Evaluation of a watersaving superabsorbent polymer for forage oat (Avena sativa L.) production in an arid sandy soil. In: Proceedings of InterDrought-III Conference, Shanghai, China, pp. 91-92.
  • Karimi A, Noshadi M, Ahmadzadeh M (2009). Effects of superabsorbent polymer (igeta) on crop, soil water and irrigation interval. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 12: 415-420.
  • Kaya C, Ak BE, Higgs D (2003). Response of salt-stressed strawberry plants to supplementary calcium nitrate and/or potassium nitrate. J Plant Nutr 26: 543-560.
  • Khan W, Prithiviraj B, Smith DL (2003). Photosynthetic responses of corn and soybean to foliar application of salicylates. J Plant Physiol 160: 485-492.
  • Kiatkamjornwong S (2007). Superabsorbent polymers and superabsorbent polymer composites. ScienceAsia 33: 39-43.
  • Martin U, Alladru SG, Bahari ZA (1987). Dehydration tolerance of leaf tissues of six woody angiosperm species. Physiol Plantarum 69: 182-186.
  • McLean EO (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison WI, USA: ASA and SSSA Publisher, pp. 199-224.
  • Mertens D (2005a). AOAC Official Method 922.02. In: Horwitz W, Latimer GW, editors. Plants Preparation of Laboratory Sample. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International, pp. 1-2.
  • Mertens D (2005b). AOAC Official Method 975.03. In: Horwitz W, Latimer GW, editors. Metal in Plants and Pet Foods. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International, pp. 3-4.
  • Moll RH, Kamprath EJ, Jackson WA (1982). Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agron J 74: 562–564.
  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982). Organic Matter. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Madison WI, USA: ASA and SSSA Publisher, pp. 574-579.
  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus bicarbonate. USDA Government Printing Office Circular 939: 1-19.
  • Orzeszyna H, Garlikowski D, Pawlowski A (2006). Using of geocomposite with superabsorbent synthetic polymers as water retention element in vegetative layers. Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Science 20: 201-206.
  • Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis. 2nd ed. Madison WI, USA: ASA and SSSA Publisher.
  • Pawlowski A, Lejcus K, Garlikowski D, Orezesyna H (2009). Geocomposite with superabsorbent as an element improving water availability for plants on slopes. Geophys Res Lett 11: 1-2.
  • Poormeidany A, Khakdaman H (2006). Study of Aquasorb polymer application on irrigation of Pinus eldarica, Olea europea and Atriplex canescens seedlings. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 13: 79-92.
  • Rafiei F, Nourmohammadi G, Chokan R, Kashani A, Haidari H (2013). Investigation of superabsorbent polymer usage on maize under water stress. Global Journal of Medicinal Plant Research 1: 82-87.
  • Rhoades JD (1996). Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In: Sparks DL, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Chemical Methods. Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America, pp. 417-435.
  • Richards LA (1948). Porous plate apparatus for measuring moisture retention and transmission by soil. Soil Sci 66: 105-110.
  • Sarvas M, Pavlenda P, Takacova E (2007). Effect of hydrogel application on survival and growth of pine grainling in reclamations. For Sci 53: 204-209.
  • Senaratna T, McKersie BD (1983). Characterization of solute efflux from dehydration injured soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) seeds. Plant Physiol 72: 911-914.
  • Shi L, Chen B, Wang Z, Elias DA, Mayer MU, Gorby YA (2006). Isolation of a high-affinity functional protein complex between OmcA and MtrC: two outer membrane decaheme c-type cytochromes of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J Bacteriol 188: 4705-4714.
  • Soil Survey Staff (1992). Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples and Methods of Analysis for Soil Survey. Soil Survey Investigation Report No. 1. Washington, DC, USA: US Government Printing Office.
  • Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996). Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks DL, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical Properties. 3rd ed. Madison, WI, USA: ASA, SSSA, CSSA, pp. 1201-1229.
  • Taylor KC, Halfacre RG (1986). The effect of hydrophilic polymer on media water retention and nutrient availability to Ligustrum lucidum. HortScience 21: 1159-1161.
  • Thomas GW (1982). Exchangeable cations. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Madison WI, USA: ASA and SSSA Publisher, pp. 159-165.
  • Vasques-Tello A, Zuily-Fodil Y, Phamthi AT, Vieira DA, Silva JB (1990). Electrolyte and Pi leakage and soluble sugar content as physiological tests for screening resistance to water stress in Phasedous and Vigna species. J Exp Bot 41: 827-832.
  • Vieira da Silva J, Naylor AW, Kramer PJ (1974). Some ultrastructural and enzymatic effects of drought stress in cotton (Gossypiumhirsutum L.) leaves. P Natl Acad Sci USA 71: 3243- 324.
  • Yazdani F, Allahdadi I, Akbari GA (2007). Impact of superabsorbent polymer on yield and growth analysis of Soybean (Glycine max L.) under drought stress condition. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10: 4190-4196.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK