Evaluation of a Low-Cost GPS Receiver for Precision Agriculture Use in Adana Province of Turkey

The most vital factor in the application of precision agriculture technology is the cost of the required high-technology equipment. The equipment cost is the major obstacle in adopting the precision agriculture. GPS receiver is one of the most essential tools with high initial costs in this technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-cost GPS receiver in 3 different tests including static, dynamic circular area, and dynamic straight line tests. It was observed that the tested low-cost GPS receiver yielded a deviation of less than 1.50 m, 1.60 m, and 1.48 m in static, circular area, and straight line tests, respectively. It can be concluded that the low-cost GPS receiver without differential correction can be used for variable fertilizer application and soil and yield mapping since it has an appropriate accuracy values for these applications. On the other hand, it would not be suitable for some precision agriculture applications that require an accuracy of less than 1 m such as variable herbicide application and row crop planting. Instead, a GPS receiver with differential correction service should be employed for such applications. In addition, the mean percent error values were -1.3% and -0.5% in all tests in the circle area calculation. These values can be considered to be acceptable for the field area calculation studies.

Evaluation of a Low-Cost GPS Receiver for Precision Agriculture Use in Adana Province of Turkey

The most vital factor in the application of precision agriculture technology is the cost of the required high-technology equipment. The equipment cost is the major obstacle in adopting the precision agriculture. GPS receiver is one of the most essential tools with high initial costs in this technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-cost GPS receiver in 3 different tests including static, dynamic circular area, and dynamic straight line tests. It was observed that the tested low-cost GPS receiver yielded a deviation of less than 1.50 m, 1.60 m, and 1.48 m in static, circular area, and straight line tests, respectively. It can be concluded that the low-cost GPS receiver without differential correction can be used for variable fertilizer application and soil and yield mapping since it has an appropriate accuracy values for these applications. On the other hand, it would not be suitable for some precision agriculture applications that require an accuracy of less than 1 m such as variable herbicide application and row crop planting. Instead, a GPS receiver with differential correction service should be employed for such applications. In addition, the mean percent error values were -1.3% and -0.5% in all tests in the circle area calculation. These values can be considered to be acceptable for the field area calculation studies.

___

  • Adamchuk, V.I. 2001. Untangling the GPS data string. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Publication. EC 01-157.
  • Bennett, P. 2003. The NMEA FAQ. Version 6.4. http://vancouver- webpages.com/pub/peter/nmeafaq.txt (Last Accessed: 27 November 2008).
  • Cole, J.T., T.S.Stombaugh and S.A.Shearer. 2004. Development of a test track for the evaluation of GPS receiver dynamic performance. ASAE/CSAE Meeting Paper No. 041060. 1-4 August 2004. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ehsani, M.R., M.D.Sullivan, T.L.Zimmerman and T.Stombaugh. 2003. Evaluating the dynamic accuracy of low-cost GPS receivers. ASAE Paper No. 031014. ASAE Annual International Meeting. 27-30 July 2003. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
  • Iyidir, B. and Y.Ozkazanc. 2004. Jamming of GPS receivers. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (Ed.B.Gunsel), pp.747- 750.
  • Keskin, M. and S. M. Say. 2006. Feasibility of low-cost GPS receivers for ground speed measurement. Comp. Electr. Agric. 54: 36-43.
  • Koc, A.B., C.Koc, Y.B.Yurtlu and M. Vatandas. 2006. Static and dynamic tests of a low-cost GPS receiver (in Turkish). 23rd National Mechanization Congress. 6-8 September 2006. Canakkale, Turkey. pp.277-282.
  • Lechner, W. and S.Baumann. 2000. Global navigation satellite systems. Comp. Electr. Agric. 25: 67-85.
  • Letham, L. 1999. GPS Made Easy: Using Global Positioning Systems in the Outdoors. Second Edition. The Mountaineers. Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Meridian World Data. 2007. Distance calculation. www.meridianworlddata.com/Distance-Calculation.asp (Last Accessed: 26 October 2007).
  • Morgan, M. and D. Ess. 1997. The Precision Farming Guide for Agriculturists. John Deere Publishing, Moline, Illinois, USA.
  • Schwieger, V. 2005. Quality of low-cost GPS for geodetic and navigation applications. GIS Development. Vol.1 Issue 5.
  • Shannon, D.K., C. E. Ellis and G. D. Hoette. 2006. Performance of a decimeter accuracy GPS receiver for the development of topographic maps. ASABE Meeting Paper No. 06-1046. 9-12 July 2006. Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Shannon, D.K., C. E. Ellis and G. D. Hoette. 2002. Performance of “low- cost” GPS receivers for yield mapping. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 02-1151. 28-31 July 2002. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Shannon, D.K., J. Brumett, C. E. Ellis and G. D. Hoette. 2001. Can a $300 GPS receiver be used for yield mapping? ASAE Meeting Paper No. 01-1154. 31 July-1 August 2002. Sacramento, California, USA.
  • Stafford, J. V. 1999. GPS in agriculture – A growing market J. Navig. 52: 60-69.
  • Stombaugh, T.S., B.K.Koostra and S.A.Shearer. 2003. Using low-cost GPS receivers for boundary mapping. ASAE Paper No. 031010. ASAE Annual International Meeting. 27-30 July 2003, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
  • Taylor, R.K., M. D.Schrock, J. Bloomfield, G. Bora, G. Brockmeier, W. Burton, B.Carlson, J.Gattis, R.Groening, J.Kopriva, N.Oleen, J.Ney, C.Simmelink and J.Vondracek. 2004. Dynamic testing of GPS receivers. Trans. ASAE. 47: 1017-1025.
  • Thales Navigation, 2002. User Manual: Meridian® Series of GPS Receivers. Thales Navigation. San Dimas, CA, USA.
  • Trimble, 2003. DSM 132/132RS Receiver User Guide. Trimble Construction Instruments Division. Dayton, Ohio, USA.
  • Zengin, H. and A.Yesil. 2006. Comparing the performances of real-time kinematic GPS and a handheld GPS receiver under forest cover. Turk. J. Agric. For. 30: 101-110.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of a Low-Cost GPS Receiver for Precision Agriculture Use in Adana Province of Turkey

Muharrem KESKİN, Sait M. SAY, Serap Görücü KESKİN

Selection for test weight and kernel weight in high yielding wheat using a safety-first ındex

Emre İLKER, Muzaffer TOSUN, Metin ALTINBAŞ

The Effects of Four Organic Soil Conditioners on Aggregate Stability, Pore Size Distribution, and Respiration Activity in a Sandy Loam Soil

Shokrollah ASGHARI, Mohammad Reza NEYSHABOURI, Fariborz ABBASI, Nasser ALIASGHARZAD, Shahin OUSTAN

Selection for Test Weight and Kernel Weight in High Yielding Wheat Using a Safety-First Index

Emre İLKER, Metin ALTINBAŞ, Muzaffer TOSUN

Identification of potato Y potyvirus (PVY') resistance in wild and Cultivated tomatoes

Fevziye Çelebi TOPRAK, Sami DOĞANLAR, Eminur BARUTÇU, Anne FRARY

Identification of Potato Y Potyvirus (PVYO) Resistance in Wild and Cultivated Tomatoes

Fevziye Çelebi TOPRAK, Eminur BARUTÇU, Anne FRARY, Sami DOĞANLAR

Development, Fecundity, and Prey Consumption of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) Fed Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisduval

Oktay KUŞTUTAN, İbrahim ÇAKMAK

Variability in the Response of Chickpea Cultivars to Short-Term Salinity, in Terms of Water Retention Capacity, Membrane Permeability, and Osmo-Protection

Neera GARG, Ranju SINGLA

Plant Growth and Mineral Element Content of Different Gourd Species and Watermelon under Salinity Stress

Halit YETİŞİR, Veli UYGUR

Influence of Temperature on Life Table Parameters of the Predaceous Mite Euseius finlandicus (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

İsmail KASAP