Evaluation of a Low-Cost GPS Receiver for Precision Agriculture Use in Adana Province of Turkey
The most vital factor in the application of precision agriculture technology is the cost of the required high-technology equipment. The equipment cost is the major obstacle in adopting the precision agriculture. GPS receiver is one of the most essential tools with high initial costs in this technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-cost GPS receiver in 3 different tests including static, dynamic circular area, and dynamic straight line tests. It was observed that the tested low-cost GPS receiver yielded a deviation of less than 1.50 m, 1.60 m, and 1.48 m in static, circular area, and straight line tests, respectively. It can be concluded that the low-cost GPS receiver without differential correction can be used for variable fertilizer application and soil and yield mapping since it has an appropriate accuracy values for these applications. On the other hand, it would not be suitable for some precision agriculture applications that require an accuracy of less than 1 m such as variable herbicide application and row crop planting. Instead, a GPS receiver with differential correction service should be employed for such applications. In addition, the mean percent error values were -1.3% and -0.5% in all tests in the circle area calculation. These values can be considered to be acceptable for the field area calculation studies.
Evaluation of a Low-Cost GPS Receiver for Precision Agriculture Use in Adana Province of Turkey
The most vital factor in the application of precision agriculture technology is the cost of the required high-technology equipment. The equipment cost is the major obstacle in adopting the precision agriculture. GPS receiver is one of the most essential tools with high initial costs in this technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-cost GPS receiver in 3 different tests including static, dynamic circular area, and dynamic straight line tests. It was observed that the tested low-cost GPS receiver yielded a deviation of less than 1.50 m, 1.60 m, and 1.48 m in static, circular area, and straight line tests, respectively. It can be concluded that the low-cost GPS receiver without differential correction can be used for variable fertilizer application and soil and yield mapping since it has an appropriate accuracy values for these applications. On the other hand, it would not be suitable for some precision agriculture applications that require an accuracy of less than 1 m such as variable herbicide application and row crop planting. Instead, a GPS receiver with differential correction service should be employed for such applications. In addition, the mean percent error values were -1.3% and -0.5% in all tests in the circle area calculation. These values can be considered to be acceptable for the field area calculation studies.
___
- Adamchuk, V.I. 2001. Untangling the GPS data string. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension Publication. EC 01-157.
- Bennett, P. 2003. The NMEA FAQ. Version 6.4. http://vancouver- webpages.com/pub/peter/nmeafaq.txt (Last Accessed: 27 November 2008).
- Cole, J.T., T.S.Stombaugh and S.A.Shearer. 2004. Development of a test track for the evaluation of GPS receiver dynamic performance. ASAE/CSAE Meeting Paper No. 041060. 1-4 August 2004. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
- Ehsani, M.R., M.D.Sullivan, T.L.Zimmerman and T.Stombaugh. 2003. Evaluating the dynamic accuracy of low-cost GPS receivers. ASAE Paper No. 031014. ASAE Annual International Meeting. 27-30 July 2003. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
- Iyidir, B. and Y.Ozkazanc. 2004. Jamming of GPS receivers. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (Ed.B.Gunsel), pp.747- 750.
- Keskin, M. and S. M. Say. 2006. Feasibility of low-cost GPS receivers for ground speed measurement. Comp. Electr. Agric. 54: 36-43.
- Koc, A.B., C.Koc, Y.B.Yurtlu and M. Vatandas. 2006. Static and dynamic tests of a low-cost GPS receiver (in Turkish). 23rd National Mechanization Congress. 6-8 September 2006. Canakkale, Turkey. pp.277-282.
- Lechner, W. and S.Baumann. 2000. Global navigation satellite systems. Comp. Electr. Agric. 25: 67-85.
- Letham, L. 1999. GPS Made Easy: Using Global Positioning Systems in the Outdoors. Second Edition. The Mountaineers. Seattle, WA, USA.
- Meridian World Data. 2007. Distance calculation. www.meridianworlddata.com/Distance-Calculation.asp (Last Accessed: 26 October 2007).
- Morgan, M. and D. Ess. 1997. The Precision Farming Guide for Agriculturists. John Deere Publishing, Moline, Illinois, USA.
- Schwieger, V. 2005. Quality of low-cost GPS for geodetic and navigation applications. GIS Development. Vol.1 Issue 5.
- Shannon, D.K., C. E. Ellis and G. D. Hoette. 2006. Performance of a decimeter accuracy GPS receiver for the development of topographic maps. ASABE Meeting Paper No. 06-1046. 9-12 July 2006. Portland, Oregon, USA.
- Shannon, D.K., C. E. Ellis and G. D. Hoette. 2002. Performance of “low- cost” GPS receivers for yield mapping. ASAE Meeting Paper No. 02-1151. 28-31 July 2002. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
- Shannon, D.K., J. Brumett, C. E. Ellis and G. D. Hoette. 2001. Can a $300 GPS receiver be used for yield mapping? ASAE Meeting Paper No. 01-1154. 31 July-1 August 2002. Sacramento, California, USA.
- Stafford, J. V. 1999. GPS in agriculture – A growing market J. Navig. 52: 60-69.
- Stombaugh, T.S., B.K.Koostra and S.A.Shearer. 2003. Using low-cost GPS receivers for boundary mapping. ASAE Paper No. 031010. ASAE Annual International Meeting. 27-30 July 2003, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
- Taylor, R.K., M. D.Schrock, J. Bloomfield, G. Bora, G. Brockmeier, W. Burton, B.Carlson, J.Gattis, R.Groening, J.Kopriva, N.Oleen, J.Ney, C.Simmelink and J.Vondracek. 2004. Dynamic testing of GPS receivers. Trans. ASAE. 47: 1017-1025.
- Thales Navigation, 2002. User Manual: Meridian® Series of GPS Receivers. Thales Navigation. San Dimas, CA, USA.
- Trimble, 2003. DSM 132/132RS Receiver User Guide. Trimble Construction Instruments Division. Dayton, Ohio, USA.
- Zengin, H. and A.Yesil. 2006. Comparing the performances of real-time kinematic GPS and a handheld GPS receiver under forest cover. Turk. J. Agric. For. 30: 101-110.