Effects of depth-dependent irrigation regimes and organomineral fertilizers on water use and quality attributes of sugar beet
Effects of depth-dependent irrigation regimes and organomineral fertilizers on water use and quality attributes of sugar beet
Experiments were conducted under provincial conditions of Kayseri, Turkey, for two years in the growing seasons of 2014 and2015 to determine the effects of irrigation water applications based on different sugar beet root zone depths and different organomineralfertilizers on sugar beet yield, root quality, water consumption, and water use efficiency. Two constant root depths (D1 = 0.9 m and D2= 0.6 m) and one active water extraction root depth (D 3= 0.4–0.9 m) were investigated. A mineral fertilizer (F1), an organomineralfertilizer (F2), and organic + mineral fertilizer (F3) were considered as the subtreatments in the experiments carried out in a completelyrandomized block split-split plots design with 3 replications. Despite the lower nitrogen and phosphorus quantities applied, the F2treatment produced the same sugar beet root yield (95.31 t/ha) as F1 (88.59 t/ha) and F3 (94.56 t/ha) treatments. The irrigation waterrequirements of D1 for two years were 22.8% and 27.6% greater than the D2 and D3 treatments, respectively. Irrigation water useefficiencies of D2 and D3 treatments were higher than D1. Digestion and recoverable sugar percent and Na, K, and N contents of rootswere not affected significantly by the treatments. Using organomineral fertilizers would offer various advantages for disposing of hugeurban waste deposits and returning organic matter to agricultural areas. Use of active root water extraction depth or 0.60-m root depthfor irrigation applications will also contribute to efficient use of water resources and improve the income of sugar beet farmers due toreduced irrigation costs.
___
- Allen RG, Pereira Raes LS, Smith M (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration.
Guidelines for Computing Crop Requirements. Rome, Italy:
FAO.
Davidoff B, Hanks RJ (1989). Sugar beet production as influenced by
limited irrigation. Irrigation Science 10: 1-17.
- Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1986). Yield Response to Water. Rome,
Italy: FAO.
Erie LJ, French OF (1968). Water management of fall planted sugar
beets in Salt River Valley of Arizona. Transactions of the ASAE
11: 792-795.
- Ertaş MR (1984). Konya ovası koşullarında sulama suyu miktarında
yapılan kısıntının şeker pancarı verimine etkileri. Konya,
Turkey: Konya Bölge Toprasu Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü
(in Turkish)
Evett SR (2007). Soil water and monitoring technology. In: Lascano
RJ, Sojka RE (editors). Irrigation of Agricultural Crops.
Madison, WI, USA: Agronomy Monographs, pp. 25-84.
- Faberio C, de Santa Olalla FM, Lopez R, Dominguez A (2003).
Production and quality of the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)
cultivated under controlled deficit irrigation conditions in a
semi-arid climate. Agricultural Water Management 62: 215-
227. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00097-0
- Howell TA, Cuenca RH, Solomon KH (1992). Crop yield response. In:
Hoffman GJ, Howell TA, Solomon KH (editors). Management
of Farm Irrigation System. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASAE, pp. 95-
122.
- James LG (1988). Principles of Farm Irrigation System Design. New
York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
- Kale S, Sönmez B, Madenoğlu S, Avağ K, Türker U et al. (2017). Effect
of irrigation regimes on carbon isotope discrimination, yield
and irrigation water productivity of wheat. Turkish Journal of
Agriculture and Forestry 41: 50-58.
- Karaş E, Cengiz A, Yalçın G, Ateş Ö (2012). Eskişehir koşullarında
farklı bitki sıklığı ile potasyum uygulamasının şeker
pancarının verim ve kalitesine etkisi. In: Proceedings of the
1st International Anatolian Sugar Beet Symposium, Kayseri,
Turkey, pp. 103-110 (in Turkish).
- Katerji N, Mastrorilli M (2009). The effect of soil texture on the
water use efficiency of irrigated crops: results of a multi-year
experiment carried out in the Mediterranean region. European
Journal of Agronomy 30: 95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.07.009
- Keller J, Bliesner RD (1990). Sprinkle and Trickle Irrigation. Caldwell,
NJ, USA: Blackburn Press.
Kiymaz S, Ertek A (2015a). Yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta
vulgaris L.) at different water and nitrogen levels under the
climatic conditions of Kırşehir, Turkey. Agricultural Water
Management,158: 156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.05.004
- Kiymaz S, Ertek A (2015b). Water use and yield of sugar beet (Beta
vulgaris L.) under drip irrigation at different water regimes.
Agricultural Water Management 158: 225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.
agwat.2015.05.005
- Köksal ES (2006). Determination of the effects of different irrigation
level on sugarbeet yield, quality and physiology using infrared
thermometer and spectroradiometer. PhD, Ankara University
Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- Köksal ES, Yıldırım YE (2011). Using Crop water stress index for
determination of sugar beet irrigation time. Anadolu Journal
of Agricultural Sciences 26 (1): 57-62 (in Turkish with an
abstract in English).
- Mahmoodi R, Maralian H, Aghabarati A (2008). Effects of limited
irrigation on root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris
L.). African Journal of Biotechnology 7 (24): 4475-4478.
- Makinde EA (2007). Effects of an organo-mineral fertilizer
application on the growth and yield of maize. Journal of
Applied Science Research 3 (10): 1152-1155.
- Ortiz JN, de Juan JA, Tarjuelo JM (2010). Analysis of water aplication
uniformity from a center pivot and its effect on sugar beet (Beta
vulgaris L.) yield. Biosystem Engineering 105: 367-379.
- Sahin U, Anapali O, Ercisli S (2002). Physico-chemical and
physical properties of some substrates used in horticulture.
Gartenbauwissenschaft 67 (2): 55-60.
- Sahin U, Kiziloglu FM, Anapali O, Okuroglu M (2007). Determining
crop and pan coefficients for sugar beet and potato crops
under cool season semiarid climatic conditions. Journal of
Agronomy and Crop Science 193: 146-152. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-
037X.2006.00248.x
- Sahin U, Ors S, Kiziloglu MF, Kuslu Y (2014). Evaluation of water use
and yield responses of drip-irrigated sugar beet with different
irrigation techniques. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research
74 (3): 302-310. doi: 10.4067/S0718-58392014000300008
- Sarafi E, Siomos A, Tsouvaltzis P, Chatzissavvidis C, Therios I
(2018). Boron and maturity effects on biochemical parameters
and antioxidant activity of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)
cultivars. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 42: 237-
247.
- Sarı S, Aksakal EL, Angın İ (2017). Influence of vermicompost
application on soil consistency limits and soil compatibility.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 41: 357-371.
- Sinclair TR, Rufty TW (2012). Nitrogen and water resources
commonly limit crop yield increases, not necessarily plant
genetics. Global Food Security 1 (2): 94-98.
- Smith GH, Chaney K, Murray C, Le MS (2015). The effect of
organo-mineral fertilizer applications on the yield of winter
wheat, spring barley, forage maize and grass cut for silage.
Journal of Environmental Protection 6: 103-109. doi: 10.4236/
jep.2015.62012
- Süheri S, Topak R, Yavuz D (2008). Effect of different irrigation
regimes applied in different growth stages on root and sugar
yield of sugar beet. In: Proceedings of Groundwater and
Drought in Konya Closed Basin, Konya, Turkey, pp. 342-354
(in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- Sunulu S, Sunulu C, Soygeniş AF (2012). Kahramanmaraş Merkez
koşullarında kışlık şeker pancarı yetiştirme olanakları. In:
Proceedings of the 1st International Anatolian Sugar Beet
Symposium, Kayseri, Turkey, pp. 165-172 (in Turkish).
- Topak R, Süheri S, Acar B (2010). Comparison of energy of irrigation
regimes in sugar beet production in a semi-arid region. Energy
35: 5464-5471. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.018
- Topak R, Süheri S, Acar B (2011). Effect of different drip irrigation
regimes on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield, quality and water
use efficiency in Middle Anatolian, Turkey. Irrigation Science
29: 79-89. doi: 10.1007/s00271-010-0219-3
- Uçan K, Gençoğlan C (2004). The effect of water deficit on yield and
yield components of sugar beet. Turkish Journal of Agriculture
and Forestry 28: 163-172.
- Winter SR (1989). Sugarbeet yield and quality response to irrigation,
row width and stand density. Journal of Sugarbeet Research 26
(1): 26-33.
- Yıldırım O (1990). Sugar Beet Yields Response to Surface Drip
and Subsurface Irrigation Methods. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara
Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi (in Turkish with an abstract in
English).