Effect of Al compounds on soil pH and bioavailability of Al in two acid soils

Two aluminum compounds, AlCl3 and Al(OH)3, were used to determine the effect of Al compounds on pH and bioavailability of Al in 2 acid soils. Both soils were incubated for periods of 3, 10, and 30 days. Al-tolerant (ET8) and Al-sensitive (ES8) wheat seedlings were used as a testing plant to confirm bioavailability of Al3+ in soil solution. Both soils were acidified through the addition of Al compounds to detect the maximum Al3+ toxicity level of these compounds. The results showed that the AlCl3 compound increased the bioavailability of Al3+ in soil solutions. In contrast, AlCl3 decreased bulk soil pH. This combination of high levels of extractable Al and low pH decreased the root proliferation of both ES8 and ET8. However, Al(OH)3 did not change soil pH, the bioavailability of Al, or the root length of either ES8 or ET8. These findings indicated that Al(OH)3 did not increase Al3+ activity in soil solutions. It can be concluded from this study that AlCl3 and a short incubation period can be used to manipulate soil pH and the bioavailability of Al in soil for further study. However, Al(OH)3 cannot be used to manipulate soil pH or the bioavailability of Al in soil.

Effect of Al compounds on soil pH and bioavailability of Al in two acid soils

Two aluminum compounds, AlCl3 and Al(OH)3, were used to determine the effect of Al compounds on pH and bioavailability of Al in 2 acid soils. Both soils were incubated for periods of 3, 10, and 30 days. Al-tolerant (ET8) and Al-sensitive (ES8) wheat seedlings were used as a testing plant to confirm bioavailability of Al3+ in soil solution. Both soils were acidified through the addition of Al compounds to detect the maximum Al3+ toxicity level of these compounds. The results showed that the AlCl3 compound increased the bioavailability of Al3+ in soil solutions. In contrast, AlCl3 decreased bulk soil pH. This combination of high levels of extractable Al and low pH decreased the root proliferation of both ES8 and ET8. However, Al(OH)3 did not change soil pH, the bioavailability of Al, or the root length of either ES8 or ET8. These findings indicated that Al(OH)3 did not increase Al3+ activity in soil solutions. It can be concluded from this study that AlCl3 and a short incubation period can be used to manipulate soil pH and the bioavailability of Al in soil for further study. However, Al(OH)3 cannot be used to manipulate soil pH or the bioavailability of Al in soil.

___

  • Ahn SJ, Matsumoto H (2006) The role of the plasma membrane in the response of plant roots to aluminum toxicity. Plant Signal Behav 1: 37-45.
  • Alva AK, Kerven GL, Edwards DG, Asher CJ (1991) Reduction in toxic aluminum to plants by sulfate complexation. Soil Sci 152: 351-359.
  • Arsenault JL, Pouleur S, Messier C, Guay R (1995) WinRHIZO™, a root- measuring system with a unique overlap correction method. Hort Sci 30: 906.
  • Bache BW (1974) Soluble aluminium and calcium-aluminium exchange in relation to the pH of dilute calcium chloride suspensions of acid soils. J Soil Sci 25: 320-332.
  • Budavari S (1989) The Merck Index, 11th ed. Merck, New Jersey, USA.
  • Chang R (2010) Chemistry. McGraw Hill, New York, USA.
  • Curtin D, Smillie GW (1995) Effects of incubation and pH on soil solution and exchangeable cation ratios. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59: 1006-1011.
  • Fisher JA, Scott BJ (1987) Response to selection for aluminium tolerance. In: Priorities in Soil/Plant Relations Research for Plant Production (Eds. PGE Searle and BG Davey). University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, pp. 135-137.
  • Iqbal MT, Sale P, Tang C (2010) Phosphorus ameliorates aluminium toxicity of Al-sensitive wheat seedlings. In: Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 92- 95.
  • Isbell, RF (2002) The Australian Soil Classification. CSIRO, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kerven GL, Edwards DG, Asher CJ, Hallman PS, Kokot S (1989) Aluminium determination in soil solution. II. Short-term colorimetric procedures for the measurement of inorganic monomeric aluminium in the presence of organic acid ligands. Aust J Soil Res 27: 91-102.
  • Magistad OC (1925) The aluminum content of the soil solution and its relation to soil reaction and plant growth. Soil Sci 20:181-226.
  • Menzies NW, Bell LC (1988) Evaluation of the influence of sample preparation and extraction technique on soil solution composition. Aust J Soil Res. 26: 451-464.
  • Menzies NW, Bell LC, Edwards DG (1991) Effects of incubation time and filtration technique on soil solution composition with particular reference to inorganic and organically complexed Al. Aust J Soil Res 29: 223-238.
  • Milne CJ, Kinniburgh DG, de Wit JCM, van Riemsdijk WH, Koopal LK (1995) Analysis of proton bonding by a peat humic acid using a simple electrostatic model. Geo Cos Acta 59: 1101-1112.
  • Perdue EM (1985) Acidic functional groups of humic substances. In: Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment and Water (Eds. GR Aiken, DM McKnight, RL Wershaw, P MacCarthy). Wiley, New York, USA, pp. 493-526.
  • Richens DT (1997) The Chemistry of Aqua Ions. Wiley, New York, USA.
  • Robinson RA, Britton HTS (1931) The amphoteric nature of aluminium hydroxide. J Chem Soc: 2817-2820.
  • Serrano E (2003) Banana soil acidification in the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica and its relationship with increased aluminium concentrations. In: Banana Root System: Towards a Better Understanding for its Productive Management, Proceedings of an International Symposium (Eds. DW Turner, F Rosales), San Jose, Costa Rica, pp. 142-148.
  • Skyllberg U (1999) pH and solubility of aluminium in acidic forest soils: a consequence of reactions between organic acidity and aluminium alkalinity. Eur J Soil Sci 50: 95-106.
  • Soon YK (1993) Fractionation of extractable aluminum in acid soils: a review and a proposed procedure. Com Soil Sci Plant Anal 24:1683-1708.
  • Tanaka A, Tadano T, Yamamoto K, Kananura N (1987) Comparison of toxicity to plants among Al3+, AlSO4+ and AlF complex ions. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 33: 43-55.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Some quality characteristics of selected durum wheat (Triticum durum) landraces

Abdulvahit SAYASLAN, Mehmet KOYUNCU, Ahmet YILDIRIM, Tuğba Eserkaya GÜLEÇ

Prohexadione-Ca and young cane removal treatments control growth, productivity, and fruit quality of the Willamette raspberry

Milena M. POLEDICA, Jasminka M. MILIVOJEVIC

Morphological diversity of the Turkish apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm in the Irano-Caucasian ecogeographical group

Kadir Uğurtan YILMAZ, Sevgi Paydaş KARGI, Salih KAFKAS

Effect of some botanicals for the management of plant-parasitic nematodes and soil-inhabiting fungi infesting chickpea

Rose RIZVI, İrshad MAHMOOD, Sartaj Ali TIYAGI, Zehra KHAN

Effect of irrigation on processing tomato yield and antioxidant components

Lajos HELYES, Andrea LUGASI, Zoltán PEK

A predictive model for the effects of temperature on the germination period of flax seeds (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Orhan KURT

Comparison of essential oil components of wild and field grown Salvia cryptantha Montbert & Aucher ex Benthan, in Turkey

Arif İPEK, Bilal GÜRBÜZ, M. Ümid BİNGÖL, Fatmagül GEVEN, Gençay AKGÜL

Abdur RAB, İhsan-ul HAQ

Comparison of essential oil components of wild and field grown Salvia cryptantha Montbert & Aucher ex Benthan, in Turkey

Arif İPEK, Bilal GÜRBÜZ, M. Ümid BİNGÖL, Fatmagül GEVEN, Gençay AKGÜL

Exploring the growth potential of Albizia procera and Leucaena leucocephala as influenced by magnetic fields

Muhammad Ayyoub TANVIR, Zia-ul- HAQ, Abdul HANNAN, Muhammad Farrakh NAWAZ, Muhammad Tahir SIDDIQUI, Amer SHAH