Drought stress responses of seedlings of two oak species (Quercus cerris and Quercus robur)

Öz Effects of drought stress on growth, predawn xylem water potential (ψpd), osmotic solutes (soluble sugar and proline), and stomatal conductance were assessed in two oak (Quercus cerris L. and Quercus robur L.) seedlings. Seedlings of both species were subjected to three drought treatments with the following irrigation intervals: well-watered (control: irrigation every 2-3 days), moderate drought stress (irrigation every 15 days), and severe drought stress (irrigation every 30 days). Drought-stressed seedlings of Q. cerris and Q. robur had more negative predawn xylem water potential than their well-watered seedlings. In Q. cerris, root collar diameter and root dry weights were negatively influenced by drought, while height, shoot dry weight, and root:shoot ratios were unaffected. Height and shoot dry weight of drought-stressed Q. robur were decreased, while root:shoot ratio increased. Drought caused significant decreases in stomatal conductance of both species. Q. cerris seedlings sustained higher stomatal conductance compared with Q. robur. Proline and soluble sugar increased in response to drought stress. Q. robur had a higher proline accumulation than Q. cerris. These findings suggested that the Q. cerris and Q. robur seedlings showed a drought stress adaptive mechanism either by restricting their growth or increasing root:shoot ratio or by decreasing water loss (reduced stomatal conductance) and accumulating of osmotic solutes.

___

Abrams MD (1990). Adaption and responses to drought in Quercus species of North America. Tree Physiol 7: 227-238.

Akıncı S, Lösel DM (2012). Plant Water-Stress Response Mechanisms. In: Rahman IMM, editor. Water Stress. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, pp. 15-42.

Arend M, Brem A, Kuster TM, Günthardt-Goerg MS (2012). Seasonal photosynthetic responses of European oaks to drought and elevated daytime temperature. Plant Biol 15: 169-176.

Arend M, Kuster T, Günthardt-Goerg M S, Dobbertin M (2011). Provenance-specific growth responses to drought and air warming in three European oak species ( Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Q. pubescens ). Tree Physiol 31: 287-297.

Atta HAE, Aref IM, Ahmed AI, Khan PR (2012). Morphological and anatomical response of Acacia ehrenbergiana Hayne and Acacia tortilis (Forssk) Haynes subspp. raddiana seedlings to induced water stress. Afr J Biotechnol 11: 10188-10199.

Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39: 205-207.

Bhaskara GB, Yang T, Verslues PE (2015). Dynamic proline metabolism: importance and regulation in water limited environments. Front Plant Sci 6: 484.

Blum A (1996). Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. Plant Growth Regul 20: 135-148.

Chavarria G, Pessoa dos Santos H (2012). Plant water relations: absorption, transport and control mechanisms. In: Montanaro G, Dichio B, editors. Advances in Selected Plant Physiology Aspects. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, pp. 105-132.

Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003). Understanding plant response to drought-from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30: 239-264.

Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco JP, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osorio ML, Carvalh I, Faria T, Pinheiro C (2002). How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot 89: 907-916.

Cotrozzi L, Remorini D, Pellegrini E, Landi M, Massai R, Nali C, Guidi L, Lorenzini G (2016). Variations in physiological and biochemical traits of oak seedlings grown under drought and ozone stress. Physiol Plant 157: 69-84.

Deligoz A, Bayar E, Yazici N (2016). Responses of growth, water relations and compatible solutes contents to repeated drought stress in Cedrus libani . Fresen Environ Bull 25: 3760-3767.

Deligoz A, Gur M (2015). Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses to drought stress of Stone pine ( Pinus pinea L.) seedlings. Acta Physiol Plant 37: 243.

Dickson R, Tomlinson PT (1996). Oak growth, development and carbon metabolism in response to water stress. Ann For Sci 53: 181-196.

Doğan S, Tüzer M (2011). Küresel iklim değişikliği ve potansiyel etkileri. CÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 12: 21-34 (in Turkish).

Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956). Alorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28: 350-356.

Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009). Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29: 185-212.

Fort C, Fauveau ML, Muller F, Label P, Granier A, Dreyer E (1997). Stomatal conductance, growth and root signaling in young oak seedlings subjected to partial soil drying. Tree Physiol 17: 281- 289.

Fotelli MN, Radoglou KM, Constantinidou HIA (2000). Water stress responses of seedlings of four Mediterranean oak species. Tree Physiol 20: 1065-1075.

Franco JA, Martínez-Sánchez JJ, Fernández JA, Bañón S (2006). Selection and nursery production of ornamental plants for landscaping and xerogardening in semi-arid environments. J Hort Sci Biotechnol 81: 3-17.

Kulac S, Nzokou P, Guney D, Cregg BM, Turna I (2012). Growth and physiological response of Fraser fir ( Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir.) seedlings to drought stress: seasonal and diurnal variations in photosynthetic pigments and carbohydrate concentration. Hortscience 47: 1512-1519.

Liang J, Zhang J (1999). The relations of stomatal closure and reopening to xylem ABA concentration and leaf water potential during soil drying and rewatering. Plant Growth Regul 29: 77-86.

Liang X, Zhang L, Natarajan SK, Becker DF (2013). Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxid Redox Signal 19: 998- 1011.

Liu C, Liu Y, Guo K, Fan D, Li G, Zheng Y, Yu L, Yang R (2011). Effect of drought on pigments, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzymes in six woody plant species in karst habitats of southwestern China. Environ Exp Bot 71: 174-183.

Lopushinsky W (1990). Seedling moisture status. In: Rose R, Campbell SJ, Landis TD, editors. Proceedings, Target seedling symposium, Combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report. RM–200: 123-138.

Manes F, Vitale M, Donato E, Giannini M, Puppi G (2006). Different ability of three Mediterranean oak species to tolerate progressive water stress. Photosynthetica 44: 387-393.

Öztürk NZ (2015). Bitkilerin kuraklık stresine tepkilerinde bilinenler ve yeni yaklaşımlar. Türk Tarım-Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 3: 307-315 (in Turkish).

Öztürk S (2013). Türkiye Meşeleri Teşhis ve Tanı Kılavuzu. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Orman Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları (in Turkish).

Peguero-Pina JJ, Sancho-Knapik D, Morales F, Flexas J, Gil-Pelegrín E (2009). Differential photosynthetic performance and photoprotection mechanisms of three Mediterranean evergreen oaks under severe drought stress. Funct Plant Biol 36: 453-462.

Popović Z, Milanović S, Miletić Z, Smiljanić M (2010). Photosynthetic efficiency of Pedunculate oak seedlings under simulated water stress. Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry 101: 139-150.

Provost GL, Domergue F, Lalanne C, Campos PR, Grosbois AG, Bert D, Meredieu C, Danjon F, Plomion C, Gion J (2013). Soil water stress affects both cuticular wax content and cuticle-related gene expression in young saplings of maritime pine ( Pinus pinaster Ait). BMC Plant Biology 13: 95.

Raftoyannis Y, Radoglou K (2002). Physiological responses of beech and sessile oak in a natural mixed stand during a dry summer. Ann Bot 89: 723-730.

Ranney TG, Bassuk NL, Whitlow TH (1991). Osmotic adjustment and solute constituents in leaves and roots of water-stressed cherry ( Prunus ) trees. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 116: 684-688.

Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED (1965). Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148: 339-346.

Shvaleva AL, Silva FCE, Breia E, Jouve L, Hausman JF, Almeida MH, Maroco JP, Rodrigues ML, Pereira JS, Chaves MM (2005). Metabolic responses to water deficit in two Eucalyptus globulus clones with contrasting drought sensitivity. Tree Physiol 26: 239-248.

Stojnić S, Pekeč S, Kebert M, Pilipović A, Stojanović D, Stojanović M, Orlović S (2016). Drought effects on physiology and biochemistry of pedunculate oak ( Quercus robur L.) and hornbeam ( Carpinus betulus L.) saplings grown in urban area of Novi Sad, Serbia. South-east European forestry 7: 57-63.

Struve DK, Ferrini F, Fini A, Pennati L (2009). Relative growth and water use of seedlings from three Italian Quercus species. Arboric Urban For 35: 113-121.

Szabados L. Savouré A (2010). Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci 15: 89-97.

Valladares F, Sánchez-Gómez D (2006). Ecophysiological traits associated with drought in Mediterranean tree seedlings: individual responses versus interspecific trends in eleven species. Plant Biol 8: 688-697.

Vasques A, Chirino E, Vilagrosa A, Ramón Vallejo V, Jacob Keizer J (2013). The role of seed provenance in the early development of Arbutus unedo seedlings under contrasting watering conditions. Environ Exp Bot 96: 11-19.

Vasques AR, Pinto G, Dias MC, Correia CM, Moutinho-Pereira JM, Vallejo VR, Santos C, Keizer JJ (2016). Physiological response to drought in seedlings of Pistacia lentiscus (mastic tree). New For 47: 119-130.

Verbruggen N, Hermans C (2008). Proline accumulation in plants: a review. Amino Acids 35: 753-759.

Wu M, Zhang WH, Ma C, Zhou JY (2013). Changes in morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses to different levels of drought stress in Chinese cork oak ( Quercus variabilis Bl.) seedlings. Russ J Plant Physl 60: 681-692.

Xu Z, Zhou G, Shimizu H (2010). Plant responses to drought and rewatering. Plant Signal Behav 5: 649-654.

Zang U, Goisser M, Häberle K, Matyssek R, Matzner E, Borken W (2014). Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis, rhizosphere respiration, and fine-root characteristics of beech saplings: a rhizotron field study. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177: 168-177.