Differences in some physical and chemical properties of wheat grains from different parts within the spike

There is not enough information on the distribution of grain components from different areas within a spike of wheat. The aim of this study was to determine how grain position affects some physical and chemical properties of grains. Grain size, thousand-grain and hectoliter weight, Zeleny sedimentation, falling number, wheat color, grain hardness, wet and dry gluten contents, and protein and ash contents were determined in grains from different parts of the spike (bottom, middle, and top) in Karasu-90, Palandöken-97, Yıldırım, Bezostaya-1, and Doğu-88 wheat varieties. Grain position in the spike had a significant effect on some physical and chemical properties of grains. The protein content of grains increased from the top to the bottom of the spike. Grains from the middle portion of wheat spikes were larger than those from the top and bottom portions. The lowest dry gluten values were obtained from the top part while the highest values were determined in the bottom of the spike. In addition, significant differences were observed among grain positions within the spike based on hectoliter weights.

Differences in some physical and chemical properties of wheat grains from different parts within the spike

There is not enough information on the distribution of grain components from different areas within a spike of wheat. The aim of this study was to determine how grain position affects some physical and chemical properties of grains. Grain size, thousand-grain and hectoliter weight, Zeleny sedimentation, falling number, wheat color, grain hardness, wet and dry gluten contents, and protein and ash contents were determined in grains from different parts of the spike (bottom, middle, and top) in Karasu-90, Palandöken-97, Yıldırım, Bezostaya-1, and Doğu-88 wheat varieties. Grain position in the spike had a significant effect on some physical and chemical properties of grains. The protein content of grains increased from the top to the bottom of the spike. Grains from the middle portion of wheat spikes were larger than those from the top and bottom portions. The lowest dry gluten values were obtained from the top part while the highest values were determined in the bottom of the spike. In addition, significant differences were observed among grain positions within the spike based on hectoliter weights.

___

  • Ali A, Atkins I, Rooney L, Porter K (1969) Kernel dimensions, weight, protein content and milling yield of grain from portions of the wheat spike. Crop Sci 9: 329-330.
  • American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) (1983) Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 8th ed. Method 56-81. AACC, St Paul, MN, USA.
  • American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) (2000) Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 10th ed. Methods 08-01, 44-15A, 46-11A. AACC, St Paul, MN, USA.
  • Bramble T, Dowell FE, Herrman TJ (2006) Single-kernel near- infrared protein prediction and the role of kernel weight in hard red winter wheat. Am Soc Agr Biol Eng 22: 945-949.
  • Bramble T, Herrman TJ, Loughin T, Dowell F (2002) Single kernel protein variance structure in commercial wheat fi elds in western Kansas. Crop Sci 42: 1488-1492.
  • Calderini D, Ortiz-Monasterio I (2003) Grain position aff ects grain macronutrient and micronutrient concentrations in wheat. Crop Sci 43: 141-151.
  • D’Egidio MG (2001) Composition and quality of durum wheat and pasta products. In: Durum Wheat, Semolina and Pasta Quality: Recent Achievements and New Trends (Eds. J Abecais, JC Autran, P Feillet). INRA, Paris, pp. 93-112.
  • Elgün A, Ertuğay Z, Certel M, Kotancılar HG (1999) Guide Book for Analytical Quality Control and Laboratory for Cereal and Cereal Products. Atatürk Univeristy Press, Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Huebner FR, Kaczkowski J, Bietz JA (1990) Quantitative variation of wheat proteins from grain at diff erent stages of maturity and from diff erent spike locations. Cereal Chem 67: 464-470.
  • İlker E, Altınbaş M, Tosun M (2009) Selection for test weight and kernel weight in high yielding wheat using a safety-fi rst index. Turk J Agric For 33: 37-45.
  • International Association for Cereal Science and Technology (ICC) (2000) Th e Standard Methods of the ICC, 2000 ed. ICC Standard No. 137⁄1, Approved 1982 and Revised 1994. ICC, Vienna, Austria.
  • International Association of Cereal Chemistry (IACC) (1972) International Association of Cereal Chemistry Standard No. 115-116. IACC, St Paul, MN, USA.
  • Ktenioudaki A, Butler F, Gallagher E (2010) Rheological properties and baking quality of wheat varieties from various geographical regions. J Cereal Sci 51: 402-408.
  • Magness JR, Markle GM, Compton CC (1971) Food and Feed Crops of the United States: A Descriptive List Classifi ed According to Potentials for Pesticide Residues. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  • Mares D, Mrva K (2008) Late-maturity α-amylase: low falling number in wheat in the absence of preharvest sprouting. J Cereal Sci 4: 6-17.
  • Miller CL (2003) Variation in Single Kernel Hardness within the Wheat Spike. BS Th esis. Kansas State University, College of Agriculture, p. 32.
  • Morris CF, Campbell KG, Kin GE (2005) Kernel texture diff erences among US soft wheat cultivars. J Sci Food Agr 85: 1959-1965.
  • Mut Z, Aydin N, Bayramoglu HO, Ozcan H (2010) Stability of some quality traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes. J Environ Biol 31: 489-495.
  • Roccia P, Ribotta PD, Perez GT, Leon AE (2009) Infl uence of soy protein on rheological properties and water retention capacity of wheat gluten. LWT-Food Sci Technol 42: 358-362.
  • Slaughter DC, Norris KH, Hruschka WR (1992) Quality and classifi cation of hard red wheat. Cereal Chem 69: 428-432.
  • Snape J, Fish L, Leader D, Bradburne R, Turner A (2005) Th e impact of genomics and genetics on wheat quality improvement. Turk J Agr For 29: 97-103.
  • Sozinov AA, Poperelya FA (1980) Genetic classifi cation of prolamines and its use for plant breeding. Ann Technol Agric 29: 229-245.
  • Zapotoczny P, Majewska K (2010) A comparative analysis of colour measurements of the seed coat and endosperm of wheat kernels performed by various techniques. Int J Food Prop 13: 75-89.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Investigating rainfall erosivity indices in arid and semiarid climates of Iran

Elaheh Moussavi KIASSARI, Davood NIKKAMI, Mohammad Hossein MAHDIAN, Ebrahim PAZIRA

Identification of species of Vicia subgenus Vicia (Fabaceae) using chloroplast DNA data

Nadia HAIDER, Imad NABULSI, Nizar MIRALI

Characterization of sunflower testing environments in Serbia

Gordana R. BRANKOVIC, Igor M. BALALIC, Miroslav Z. ZORIC, Vladimir J. MIKLIC

The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the seedling growth of four hybrid cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cultivars

Şefik TÜFENKÇİ, Semra DEMİR, Suat ŞENSOY, Hüsameddin ÜNSAL, Emre DEMİRER

Spot blotch resistance in derivatives of European winter wheat

Zilvinas LIATUKAS, Vytautas RUZGAS

Identification and purity testing of maize hybrids with one parent in common by ultrathin-layer isoelectric focusing of seed salt-soluble proteins

Xiao-yue DOU, Min YAN, Yu-feng XU, Khalid HUSSAIN, Yuan-Zhi LIU, Feng LIN

Differences in some physical and chemical properties of wheat grains from different parts within the spike

Hüseyin BOZ, Kamil Emre GERÇEKASLAN, Mehmet Murat KARAOĞLU

Pattern analysis of multi-environment yield trials in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Soner YÜKSEL, Mevlüt AKÇURA

Mating system in natural populations of Taurus cedar (Cedrus libani A.Rich.)

Behiye Banu BİLGEN, Yusuf KURT, Nuray KAYA

Incidence and genetic stability of Potato spindle tuber pospiviroid in potato in Turkey

Üftade GÜNER, Hikmet Murat SİPAHİOĞLU, Mustafa USTA