Biochemical content in fruits of peach and nectarine cultivars

Biochemical content in fruits of peach and nectarine cultivars

In Turkey, there is an increasing interest for peach and nectarine fruits due to their sensory properties and nutritional values. The large diffusion of new peach and nectarine cultivars requires the knowledge of all fruit characteristics in connection with the cultivation area to satisfy market demand. This study seeks to determine fruit quality attributes and nutraceutical values of 7 commercially important peach (Glohaven, Dixired, Cresthaven, Redhaven, Merrill Gem Free, June Gold, and Jefferson) and 4 nectarine cultivars (Nectared4, Granstin, Cherokee, and Royal Glo) grown in Malatya region of Turkey. The fruits were evaluated for their phenolic compounds (protocatechuic, rutin, quercetin, gallic acid, catechin, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, syringic acid, p - coumaric acid, o - coumaric acid, phloridzin, and ferulic acid), organic acids (citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, and fumaric acid), vitamin C, and specific sugars (glucose, fructose, and sucrose). The results showed that peach and nectarine cultivars grown in the Malatya region exhibit an appreciable quality, but there are significant differences in quality properties of the fruits in different cultivars. Rutin (73549 mg kg(-1)), caffeic acid (70.142 mg kg(-1)), catechin (146.609 mg kg(-1)), and chlorogenic acid (211.879 mg kg(-1)) were major phenolic compounds in peach and nectarine fruits. Citric acid and malic acid were dominant organic acids in fruits of peach and nectarine cultivars.

___

  • Abidi W, Jiménez S, Moreno MA, Gogorcena Y (2011). Evaluation of antioxidant compounds and total sugar content in a nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] progeny. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12: 6919-6935.
  • Andreotti C, Ravaglia D, Ragaini A, Costa G (2008). Phenolic compounds in peach (Prunus persica) cultivars atharvest and during fruit maturation. Annals of Applied Biology 153: 11-23.
  • Aubert C, Gunata Z, Ambid C, Baumes R (2003). Changes in physicochemical characteristics and volatile constituents of yellow– and white–fleshed nectarines during maturation and artificial ripening. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 3083-3091.
  • Barut E (1999). Adaptations of different nectarine varieties to Bursa region. Proceedings of the 3rd National Congress on Horticulture, (NCH’1999), Ankara, Turkey, pp: 729-732.
  • Bassi D, Selli R (1990). Evaluation of fruit quality in peach and apricot. Advances in Horticultural Science 4: 107-112.
  • Bevilacqua AE, Califano AN (1989). Determination of organic acids in dairy products by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Food Science 54:1076-1076.
  • Butiuc-Keul A, Coste A, Farkas A, Cristea V, Isac V et al. (2019). Molecular characterization of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) genotypes originating from three complementary conservation strategies. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 43: 464-477.
  • Cantin CM, Moreno MA, Gogorcena Y (2009a). Evaluation of the antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds, and vitamin c content of different peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57: 4586-4592.
  • Cantin CM, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA (2009b). Analysis of phenotypic variation of sugar profile in different peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89: 1909-1917.
  • Cemeroglu B (2007). Food analysis. Ankara, Turkey: Food Technology Society Publication, pp. 168-171.
  • Chang S, Tan C, Frankel E, Barrett D (2000) Low–density lipoprotein antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds and polyphenol oxidase activity in selected clingstone peach cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48: 147-151.
  • Colaric M, Veberic R, Stampar F, Hudina M (2005). Evaluation of peach and nectarine fruit quality and correlations between sensory and chemical attributes. Journal of the Scienceof Food and Agriculture 85: 2611-2616.
  • Crozier A, Jaganath IB, Clifford MN (2009). Dietary phenolics: Chemistry, bioavailability and effects on health. Natural Product Research, 26: 1001-1043.
  • Del Rio D, Rodriguez - Mateos A, Spencer JPE, Tognolini M, Borges G et al. (2013). Dietary (poly) phenolics in human health: Structures, bioavailability, and evidence of protective effects against chronic diseases. Antioxidant Redox Signaling 18: 1818-1892.
  • Ercisli S, Orhan E, Esitken A, Yildirim N, Agar G (2008a). Relationships among some cornelian cherry genotypes (Cornus mas L.) based on RAPD analysis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55: 613-618.
  • Ercisli S, Akbulut M, Ozdemir O, Sengul M, Orhan E (2008b). Phenolic and antioxidant diversity among persimmon (Diospyrus kaki L.) genotypes in Turkey. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition 59: 477-482.
  • Esti M, Messia MC, Sinesio F, Nicotra A, Conte L et al. (1997). Quality evaluation of peaches and nectarines by electrochemical and multivariate analyses: relationships between analytical measurements and sensory attributes. Food Chemistry 60: 659-666.
  • FAO (2018). Food Agriculture Organization. Statistical Data Base. Rome, Italy: FAO.
  • Font i Forcada C, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA (2013). Fruit sugar profile and antioxidants of peach and nectarine cultivars on almond × peach hybrid rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae 164: 563-572.
  • Gil MI, Tomas-Barberan FA, Hess-Pierce B, Kader AA (2002). Antioxidant capacities, phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and vitamin C contents of nectarine, peach, and plum cultivars from California. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50: 4976-4982.
  • Guney M, Kafkas S, Koc A, Aras S, Keles H et al. (2019). Characterization of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) accessions by simple sequence repeat markers. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 43: 69-79.
  • Halasz J, Pedryc A, Ercisli S, Yilmaz KU, Hegedus A (2010). S-genotyping supports the genetic relationships between Turkish and Hungarian apricot germplasm. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 135 (5): 410-417.
  • Kuden AB, Comlekcioglu S, Sarier K, Imrak B, Kuden A (2018). Peach breeding studies in Turkey and the evaluation of peach and nectarine hybrids. In: Soneji J. (editor). Breeding and Health Benefits of Fruit and Nut Crops. London, UK: IntechOpen Limited, pp. 315-454.
  • Melgarejo P, Salazar DM, Artes F (2000). Organic acids and sugars composition of harvested pomegranate fruits. European Food Research and Technology 211: 185-190.
  • Orazem P, Stampar F, Hudina M (2011). Quality analysis of “Redhaven” peach fruit grafted on 11 rootstocks of different genetic origin in a replant soil. Food Chemistry 124: 1691- 1698.
  • Ozturk I, Ercisli S, Kalkan F, Demir B (2009). Some chemical and physico-mechanical properties of pear cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology 8(4): 687-693.
  • Polat AA, Caliskan O, Kamiloglu O (2012). Performance of some peach and nectarine cultivars under east Mediterranean (Hatay/Turkey) conditions. Acta Horticulturae 940:407-414.
  • Rodriguez-Delgado MA, Malovana S, Perez JP, Borges T, Garcia Montelongo FJ (2001). Separation of phenolic compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography with absorbance and fluorimetric detection. Journal Chromatography A 912: 249-257.
  • Rossato SB, Haas C, Raseira MCB, Moreira JCF, Zuanazzi JAS (2009). Antioxidant potential of peels and fleshes of peaches from different cultivars. Journal of Medicinal Food 12: 1119-1126.
  • Sahin U, Anapali O, Ercisli S (2002). Physico-chemical and physical properties of some substrates used in horticulture. Gartenbauwissenschaft 67(2): 55-60.
  • Thakur A, Singh Z (2012). Responses of ‘Spring Bright’ and ‘Summer Bright’ nectarines to deficit irrigation: Fruit growth and concentration of sugars and organic acids. Scientia Horticulturae 135: 112-119.
  • Tomas-Barberan FA, Gil MI, Cremin P, Waterhouse AL, Hess-Pierce B et al. (2001). HPLC–DAD–ESIMS Analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches, and plums. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49: 4748-4760.
  • Yarilgaç T, Balta F, Balta MF, Muradoglu F, Şen SM (2004). Physical and chemical attributes of peach cultivars grown under ecological in Van. European Journal of Horticultural Science 69 (3): 111-116.
  • Zhao X, Zhang W, Yin X, Su M, Sun C et al. (2015). Phenolic composition and antioxidant properties of different peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] cultivars in China. International Journal of Molecular Science 16 (3): 5762-5778.