Investigation of the Possibilities for After Harvest Ripening the Fruits of Cape Gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) Depending on the Applied Agrotechnology

Anahtar Kelimeler:

-

Investigation of the Possibilities for After Harvest Ripening the Fruits of Cape Gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) Depending on the Applied Agrotechnology

The main goal of the present study was to establish the possibilities for posy-harvest ripening of fruit of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). Some part of the cape gooseberry fruit can not ripen until the end of the growing season. Therefore, it is necessary to be carried out the studies in relation with after harvest ripening. This results on an increase in overall productivity. The experiments were carried out with two genotypes of cape gooseberry – first Bulgarian variety Plovdiv and Columbian ecotype Obrazec 1. The plants were grown by different technological approaches and date of sowing: with pricked out and non-pricked out seedling, by direct sowing outside. In the end of vegetation normal development fruits, without damage and injuries, but unripe fruits were placed for after harvest ripening in ambient conditions. In a period of 7 days the quantity of ripening and damaged fruits, the content of dry matter and sugars and weight of the fruits were established. The highest percentage of after harvest ripe fruits for variety Plovdiv was found in variants with non pricked out of seedlings in sowing date on 15 and 30.03 and with direct sowing outside on 15.04 - 67.0, 52.56 and 57.34%, respectively. For Obrazec 1 these values was the highest for direct sowing outside on 1.04 and 15.04 – 72.67% and 67.56%, while for non-pricked out seedling it was observed at sowing on 15.03 62.67%. Dry matter and sugar content increased, while the fruit weight decreasesd. The periods for economic efficiency of after harvest ripening were 21 days for Obrazec 1 and 35 days for Plovdiv

Keywords:

cape gooseberry, after harvest ripening, chemical components, technology fruit,

PDF

___

Antonova, G., Mihov, K., Pevicharova, G., 2014.
Broccoli Variety – IZK Iskra. Plant science, vol. LI, No. 4-5, 109-112. (Bg) Baumann, T.W., Meier, C.M., 1993. Chemical defense by withanolides during fruit in Physalis peruviana.
Christov, Ch., 2010. Cape goosverry - Physalis peruviana L. In: Seeds of rare and unknown fruits and vegetables. www.hobi-semena.com
(available of March, 2010) (Bg). 1,02 15,0 2 2,03 1,03 15,0 3 2 1 7 14 21 28 35 days 2 1 7 14 21 28 35 42 days 2 1 7 14 21 28 35days
Chernook, L.G., 1997. Tomato, pepper, eggplant, cape gooseberry. In: Series Vit., pp 288 (Ru).
FAO, 2001. FAO/WHO Food Standards. Codex
Standard for Cape gooseberry Codex Stan 226–2001. Available http://www.codexalimentarius. net/web/standard_list.jsp (accessed May 21, 2007). cial Standards. at
Fischer, G., Lüdders, P., 1997. Developmental changes of carbohydrates in cape gooseberry
(Physalis peruviana L.) fruits in relation to the calyx and the leaves. Agronomia Colombiana 14:95–107. Fischer, G., Ebert, G., Lüdders, P., 2000. Provitamin
A carotenoids, organic acids and ascorbic acid content peruviana L.) ecotypes grown at two tropical altitudes. Acta Horticulturae 531:263–267. Fowel J., Cohen, 1992. Practicle statistics for field biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2 (Physalis
Fowel J., Cohen, 1992. Practicle statistics for field biology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 223.
Haytova, D., Gergova, A., 2011. Biological behavior of patissons, grown in culture by seedlings,
Scientific research on the Union of scientists in Bulgaria-Plovdiv, series C. Technics and Tachnologies, vol.VІІІ., Union of Scientists Session 11-12 November 2010 pp.196-199. (Bg).
Panayotov, N., 2009. “Plovdiv” – the first Bulgarian variety of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). Agricultural Science, 1: 1, Agricultural
University, Plovdiv, 9 - 12. Prasad, I.D. 1979. Effect of nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potash on growth, yield and quality of cape-gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). M.Sc.
(Ag.)Thesis submitted in R.A.U., Bihar, Pusa Sahoo, D., P. Mahapatra, A.K. Das, N.R. Sahoo., 200 Effect of nitrogen and potassium on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Var. Utkal Kumari. Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 31 (3&4), 264-266
Sarangi, D., Sarkar, T.K., Roy, A.K., Jana, S.C., and Chattopadhyay, T.K., 1989. Physicochemical changes during growth of cape gooseberry fruit (Physalis peruviana L.). Progressive Horticulture 21:225–228.
Sarkar, T.K., Pradhan, U., Chattopadhyay, T.K., 19 Storability and quality changes of capegooseberry packaging and stage of maturity. influenced by Stambolova, M., Chopaneva, T., Argirova, T., 1978.
Handbook for biochemistry practice. Zemizdat, Sofia, 187. (Bg) Trinchero, G.D., Sozzi, G.O., Cerri, A.M., Vilella, F., Fraschina, A.A., 1999. Ripening related changes in ethylen poroduction, respitaion rate goldenberry
Solanceous species. Poistharvest Biology and Technology, 16 (2), 139-145. activity in a (Physalsi peruviana. L.),