Influences of Rootstocks on Fruit Quality of ‘Henderson’ Grapefruit

Bu araştırmada, Yerli turunç (Citrus aurantium L. var. “Yerli”), Carrizo and Troyer sitranjları (Citrus sinensis Osb. x Poncirus trifoliata Raf. var. “Troyer” and “Carrizo”), Swingle sitrumelo (Citrus paradisi Macf. x Poncirus trifoliata Raf.), Volkameriana (Citrus volkameriana Tan. and Pasq.) gibi bazı önemli turunçgil anaçlarının Henderson altıntopunun meyve kalitesi üzerine etkileri incelenmiştir. Çalışma 2013 yılında Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümünde 1997 yılında 8 x 8 m aralıklarla dikilmiş parselde yürütülmüştür. Değişik anaçların etkilerini görmek için meyve ağırlığı, meyve çapı, indeks, kabuk kalınlığı, meyve suyu, suda çüzünebilir kuru madde miktarı, titre edilebilir asit miktarı ve suda çözünebilir kuru madde /asit oranı incelenmiştir. En küçük meyve boyutu Troyer sitranjı anacı üzerine aşılı ağaçlardan elde edilirken diğer anaçlar üzerine aşılı olanların meyve boyutu aynı alt grupta bulunmuştur. Anaçlar toplam asit içeriğini önemli derecede etkilemiş ve en yüksek asit miktarı içeren meyveler Troyer sitranjı ve swingle sitrumelo anaçları üzerine aşılı olanlarda bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, toplam çözünebilir kuru madde üzerine de önemli bir anaç etkisi vardır ve en yüksek miktar Troyer sitranjı üzerine aşılı ağaçların meyvelerinden elde edilmiştir

Influences of Rootstocks on Fruit Quality of ‘Henderson’ Grapefruit

In this study, the effects of some important citrus rootstocks such as local sour orange (Citrus aurantium L. var. “Yerli”), Carrizo and Troyer citranges (Citrus sinensis Osb. x Poncirus trifoliata Raf. var. “Troyer” and “Carrizo”), Swingle citrumelo (Citrus paradisi Macf. x Poncirus trifoliata Raf.), Volkameriana (Citrus volkameriana Tan. and Pasq.) on fruit quality of Henderson grapefruit were investigated. The experiment was conducted in 2013 at the Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cukurova on the trees planted as 8 x 8 m in 1997. Fruit weight, diameter, index, rind thickness, juice content, total soluble solids, titratable citric acid, and TSS/TA ratio were determined in order to see the effects of various rootstocks. The smallest fruit size was obtained from the scion on Troyer citrange whereas fruit sizes of scion on the other rootstocks were in the same subset. Rootstock significantly affected total acid content and the highest total acid content of fruits was found with Troyer citrange and Swingle citrumelo. Also, there was a significant rootstock effect on total soluble solids, highest for fruits from the trees on Troyer citrange

___

  • Bevington, K.B. and Cullis, B.R., 1990. Evaluation of rootstocks for Marsh and Davis grapefruit in the Murray Region
  • Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30(3): 405-411. 2014.
  • Organization. FAOSTAT.
  • Database. http://faostat.fao.org.
  • Davies FS, Albrigo LG (1994). Citrus. Crop Protection Science in Horticulture, No: 2, CAB International, Redwood Books, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK. p. 254.
  • Ferguson, L. and Chao, C. T. 2000. Performance of ‘Okitsu Wasi’ and ‘Dobashi Beni’ satsuma mandarins on eight
  • California’s Central Valley. Proc. Int. Soc. Citricult. 133:125-129.
  • in Georgiou, A. and Gregoriou, C. 1999. Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Shamouti’
  • rootstocks in Cyprus. Sci. Hortic. 80:113-121.
  • fourteen Incesu, M., Çimen B., Yesiloglu T. and Yilmaz B., 2013. Rootstock effects on yield, fruit quality, rind and juice color of Moro blood orange. Journal of food, Agriculture & Environment. Vol. 11 (3&4): 867-871.
  • Jimenez R, Frometa E, Garcia E (1987). Effects of six rootstocks on quality of frost Eureka. Cienc. Tec. Agric. Citricos y Otros Frutales, 10(1): 73-81.
  • Lawrence FP, Bridges D (1974). Rootstocks in for
  • Cooperative Extension Service, Ins. of Food
  • University of Florida, Gainesville, p. 13. Florida and
  • Sciences, McCollum, T.G., Bowman, K.D., and castle, W.S., 2002. Effects of rootstock on fruit quality and postharvest behavior of Marsh grapefruit. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 115:44-46.
  • Ochoa, F., Mendt, R., Quintero, D., Sanchez, P., Gomez, K. and Romero, G. 1998. Evaluation of Citrus Tristeza Virus tolerant Rootstocks budded with Washington
  • http://www.ivia.es/iocv/archivos/Pro
  • ceedingsX/10th113_115.pdf.Accessed :25.06.2013. pp. 113-115.
  • Orange. Ramin, A.A., and Alirezanezhad, A., 2005. Effects of citrus rootstocks on fruit yield and quality of Ruby Red and Marsh grapefruit. Fruits, Vol.60 : 311- 317.
  • Shafieizargar, A., Awang, Y., Jurimi, A. and Othman, R. 2012. Yield and fruit quality of ‘Queen’ orange grafted on different rootstocks in Iran. AJCS 6:777-783.
  • Stover E., Pelosi, R., Burton, M., Cliento, S., and Ritenour, M., 2004. Performance of Oroblanco and Melogold Pummelo x
  • Rootstocks on a calcareous, Poorly Drained Soil. Hortscience 39 (1): 28- 32. on
  • Nine Tuzcu, Ö. 1990. Main Citrus Varieties Cultivated in Turkey. Publications of Mediterranean
  • Mersin, Turkey. Nurol Matbaası. Ankara. 74 p.
  • Unions, Tuzcu, Ö., Kaplankıran, M., Yesiloğlu, T., Düzenoğlu, S., Bahçeci, I., 1992. Effects of Some Citrus Rootstocks on the Yield and Quality of the Congress
  • 10th International Citrus Congress, 17 – 21 September 2005, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 82-84. M.
  • Citrus Özsan, 1979. Türkiye
  • turunçgil yetiştiriciliğinin dünyadaki yeri ve önemi. Akdeniz bölgesi bahçe bitkileri yetiştiriciliğinde sorunlar ve çözüm yolları
  • araştırmalar simpozyumu. İncekum, Alanya Antalya, Turkey, pp. 40-46.
  • Yildirim, B., Yeşiloğlu, T., Uysal-Kamiloğlu, M., İncesu, M., Tuzcu, Ö. and Çimen, B. 2010. Fruit yield and quality of Santa
  • rootstocks in Adana (Turkey). African Journal 5(10):1077-1081. on seven of Research
Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-3647
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Mevlüt AKÇURA
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Technological Investigations for Improvement of Grapevine Propagation Material Production in Bulgaria. Part II. Testing of Agritechnical Practices in Vine Nursery

Emil TSVETANOV, Neli Prodanova – MARINOVA, Hrisanta ENCHEVA, Violeta DIMITROVA, Anatoli ILIEV

Application Of The Intero Model For The Assesment Of The Soil Erosion Intensity And Runoff Of The River Basin Dragovo Vrelo, Montenegro

Velibor SPALEVIC, Milic CUROVIC, Vjekoslav TANASKOVİC, Nevenka DJUROVİC, Tom LENAERTS, Jan NYSSEN

Effect of Interstocks In Photosynthesis and Growth Rates for ‘Navelina’ Orange And ‘Kütdiken’ Lemon

Muge U. KAMILOGLU, Turgut YESILOGLU

Genetic and Phenotypic Variability of Grain Mass per Spike in Wheat under Different Dose of Nitrogen Nutrition

Desimir KNEZEVIC, Veselinka ZECEVIC, Danijela KONDIC, Sretenka MARKOVIC, Andrej SEKULARAC

Effect of Commercial Lipase and Protease Enzymes from Microbiological Sources on Properties of White Cheese

Oya Berkay KARACA, Mehmet GÜVEN

Agronomic Effect and Economic Efficiency of Long-Term Mineral Fertilization with Optimal Norm of Nitrogen Fertilization with Different PK Norms and Ratios on Wheat Productivity

Netcho NANKOV, Margarita NANKOVA, Genoveva BANKOVAATANASOVA

Meat Characteristics, Fatty Liver Weight and Blood Biochemical Parameters in Force-Feeding Geese

Vasko GERZILOV, Petar PETROV

Inheritance of the Traits – Seed’s Color and Plant Habitus, in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Cross

Vladimir KRASTEV, Diana SVETLEVA, Dimitar GENCHEV

Van–Gevaş Ekolojik Koşulların Da Bazı Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) Çeşitlerinin İkinci Ürün Olarak Yetiştirilmesi

Fatih ERDİN, Haluk KULAZ

Yasen F1 – New Bulgarian Pepper Variety

Velichka TODOROVA, Yanina ARNAUDOVA