Effect of Drought on the Yield Components of Common Winter Wheat Cultivars

Anahtar Kelimeler:

-

Effect of Drought on the Yield Components of Common Winter Wheat Cultivars

Drought is a typical frequent phenomenon for Bulgaria occurring with variable severity every 5 or 6 years. Since the end of the 20th century a tendency has been observed toward lower amount of rainfalls and warmer weather during the vegetation period. Therefore special attention is to be paid to the tolerance of the cultivars and their ability to preserve to a high degree their high productivity under drought as well. This investigation was carried out under greenhouse construction at the Laboratory Complex of Dobrudzha Agricultural Institute – General Toshevo (DAI). Fifteen common winter wheat cultivars were tested for three years in two variants – under conditions of severe and long-lasting drought and under regular watering. The plants from the drought variant were watered only once after planting and were grown under progressive drought till harvest. The check variant was watered at planting and during the vegetation soil moisture close to the optimal was maintained. The traits related to productivity were investigated: date to heading, stem height, number of spikes per row, number of grains per spike, 1000 kernel weight, weight of grain per spike. Using principal component analysis (PCA), the behavior of the cultivars under long-lasting drought, their productivity and the components determining it were studied. The yield from a row in the watered variant was determined mostly by the number of spikes per row, the grain size and the productivity of the spike. Under drought, the productivity of the spike became most important for yield, followed by number of spikes, grain size and number of grains per spike. The highest level of stress did almost linear the relation of grain weight per spike with grain weight per row. Cultivars Ludogorie, Progress, Karat, Kristy, Antitsa and Galateya were referred to the category of the drought-resistant standard Yantur. Under watering, these cultivars gave yields exceeding the average value of the investigated group, cultivars Kristy and Ludogorie being with the highest production potential

___

  • Alexandrov V., 2002. Climate variability and change on the Balkan peninsula. Ecology and future, I, No 2-4, 26-30 (in Bg)
  • Alexandrov V. (ed.), 2010. Climatic changes, NIMH, BAS (in Bg).
  • Slavov N., Georgieva V., 2002. Changes of the climate and the drought processes and degradation of lands in Bulgaria, Agriculture plus, № 9, 8-9 (in Bg).
  • Anwar J., Subhani G.M., Hussain M., Ahmad J., Hussain M., Munir M., 2011. Drought tolerance indices and their correlation with yield in exotic wheat genotypes, Pak. J. Bot., 43(3), 1527-1530.
  • Farshadfar F., and Sutka J. 2002. Screening drought tolerance criteria in maize. Acta Agron. Hung., 50(4), 411-416.
  • Farshadfar E., Sheibanirad A., Soltanian M., 2014. Screening landraces of bread wheat genotypes for drought tolerance in the field and laboratory. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, Vol. 3(3), 304- 311.
  • Fernandez G.C.J., 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on "Adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress, Tainan, Aug. Publication. Taiwan, 257-270. 1991, AVRDC
  • Fischer R.A., Maurer R., 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars I. Grain yield responses, Aust. J. Agric. Res., 29, 897-912.
  • Ginkel M., Calhoun D.S., Gebeyehu G., Miranda A., Tian-you C., Pargas Lara R., Trethowan R.M., Sayere K., Crossa J., Rajaram S., 1998. Plant traits related to yield of wheat in early, late, or continuous drought conditions. Euphytica 100, 109-121.
  • Habibpour M., Ahmadizadeh M., Shahbazi H., 2012. Assessment relationship between agro-morphological traits and grain yield in bread wheat genotypes under drought stress Biotechnology, Vol. 11(35), 8698-8704.
  • Khan A.J., Azam F., Ali A., 2010. Relationship of morphological traits and grain yield in recombinant inbred wheat lines grown under drought conditions. Pak. J. Bot., 42(1), 259-267.
  • Kazandjiev V., Georgieva V., Joleva D., Tsenov N., Roumenina E., Filchev L., Dimitrov P., Jelev G., 2011. Climate variability and change and conditions for winter wheat production in northeast Bulgaria, Field Crops Studies 7(2), 195-220 (Bg).
  • Khavarinejad M.S., Babajanov A.V., 2012. Study of drought tolerance indices on spring wheat in International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, Vol. 3(2), 268-278.
  • Khayatnezhad M., Zaefizadeh M., Gholamain R., 2011. Factor analysis of yield and other traits of durum wheat under drought stress and Ecophysiology, 3(2011), 23-27. Plant
  • Mollasadeghi V., Shahryari R., Imani A.A., Khayatnezhad M., 2011. Factor analysis of wheat quantitative traits on yield under terminal drought. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 10(2), 157-159.
  • Tsenov N., Ivanova A., Atanasova D., Petrova T., Tsenova E., 2012. Breeding indices for assessment of drought tolerance of winter bread wheat. Field Crops Studies 8(1), 65-74 (Bg)
  • Yan W, Rajcan I, 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario, Crop Science 42, 11-20.
Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-3647
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Mevlüt AKÇURA