Development and Survival of Chrysoperla carnea on Two Different Preys

et Özet Özet Bu çalışmada, Aphis fabae ve Aspidiotus nerii üzerinde beslenen Chrysoperla carnea’nın ergin öncesi dönemlerinin gelişme süreleri, yaşam ve ölüm oranları, sıcaklığı 26±0.0 °C’ye, nemi % 60±1’e ve fotoperiyodu 16:8 aydınlık-karanlığa ayarlanmış iklim kabinlerinde belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar istatistik olarak SPSS 21.0, JMP 8.0 ve CurveExpertPro 1.6.8 programları kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçta, A. fabae ve A. nerii ile beslenen C. carnea ‘nın yumurta, 1. larva, 2. larva, 3. larva, pupa ve toplam gelişme süreleri sırasıyla 3.00-3.00, 2.95-4.77, 2.803.77, 4.47-5.36, 6.53-7.10 ve 19.62-23.40 gün olarak hesaplanmıştır. Yumurta açılma süresi dışında tüm biyolojik dönemlerin gelişme sürelerinin istatistik olarak birbirinden farklı olduğu saptanmıştır. Her iki av üzerinde beslenen avcının biyolojik gelişme dönemlerinin zamana bağlı yaşam eğrileri Weibull dağılımı ile ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Her iki populasyonun Weibull dağılım parametreleri sırasıyla c için 0.55 ve 0.55, b için 64.18 ve 29.91 olarak hesaplanmıştır

Development and Survival of Chrysoperla carnea on Two Different Preys

AbstractAbstractAbstract In this study, development periods and survivals of Chrysoperla carnea larvae fed on Aphis fabae and Aspidiotus nerii were investigated in climate cabinets with 26±0.0 °C temperature, 60±1 % humidity and 16: 8 hours light-dark period conditions. Results were statistically evaluated by SPSS 21.0, JMP 8.0 and Curve Expert Pro 1.6.8 package programs. As a result of the study, average periods of egg, 1st instar, 2nd instar, 3rd instar, pupa and total development of C. carnea fed on A. fabae and A. nerii were 3.00-3.00, 2.95-4.77, 2.80-3.77, 4.47-5.36, 6.53-7.10 and 19.62-23.40 days, respectively. Results of the statistical analysis showed that there were significant differences among all biological periods except egg period of C. carnea. Weibull distribution was fitted to survival rate of development periods of both C. carnea populations which was developed on two preys. Survival curves was fitted to Holling’s type III life curves for both populations because of the high mortality at the development periods. Parameters of Weibull distribution equation were calculated as c = 0.55, 0.55; b = 64.18, 29.91 for both populations which were used as prey of A. fabae and A. nerii, respectively

___

  • References References References
  • Atlıhan, R., M.S. Özgökçe, M.B. Kaydan, 2001. pruni Hyalopterus
  • Aphididae) ile beslenen avcı böcek Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)’nı n bazı biyolojik özellikleri üzerine araştırmalar. Türk. Entomol. Derg., 25(3): 223-230. Batool,
  • Mamoon-ur-Rashid, Masood Khan Khattak and Syed Safeer Abbas, 2014. Effect of Prey Density on Biology and Functional Response of
  • (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Pakistan J. Zool., vol. 46(1), pp. 129-137. (Hom.: Asma Khalid Abdullah,
  • Muhammad Chrysoperla carnea
  • (Stephens) Daane, K. M., K. S. Hagen and N. J. Mills, 1998. Predaceous insects for insects and mite control. In Mass-Reared Natural Enemies: Application, Regulation and Needs. pp: 61– 115.
  • Deevey, E. S. 1947.Life tables for natural populations. Q.Rev. Biol. 22: 283‹314. Honda et al. (1998),Toyoshima (2006),van den Meiracker, 1999).
  • Gautam, S., Singh, A.K., Gautam, R.D., 2009. Comparative life table analysis of chrysopids reared on Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley in laboratory. J. Biol. Control, 23(4): 393–402.
  • Hodle, M.S. and Robinson, L., 2004. Evaluation of factors influencing augmentative releases of Chrysoperla carnea for control of Scirtothrips perseae in California avocado orchards. Biological Control 31, 268–275.
  • Jeppson, L. R., H. H. Keifer, E. W. Baker, 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. University of California Press, California, 615 p.
  • Jokar, M., Zarabi, M., 2012. Investigation effect three diets on life table parameters Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory Conditions. Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci., 5(1): 107-114.
  • Kasap, İ., Aktuğ, Y., Atlıhan, R. 2002. Avcı Böcek Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)’nın Bazı Biyolojik Özellikleri Üzerine
  • Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi (J. Agric. Sci.), 2003, 13(1): 49-53.
  • Lingren, P.D., and G. L. Green, 1984. Suppression and management of cabbage looper populations. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 1684, 152p
  • Lingren, P. D., R. L. Ridgway, and S. L. Jones. 1968. Consumption by several common arthropod predators of eggs and larvae of two Heliothis species that attack cotton. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 61 (3) : 613-8.
  • McMurtry, J. A., C. B. Huffaker, M. Van de Vrie, 1970. Ecology of Tetranychid Mites and Their Natural Enemies: I Tetranychid Enemies: Their Biological Characters and the Impact of Spray Practices. Hilgardia, 40 (11):331-390.
  • Özbesnili, E. and Özsisli, T. 2011. Determination of the Biological Traits of Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on Aspidiotus hedericola Leonardi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Türkiye IV. Bitki Koruma Kongresi Bildirileri 28-30 Haziran 2011, Kahramanmaraş, 438.
  • Pinder J.E., Wiener J.G. & Smith M.H. 1978. The Weibull distribution: a new method of summarizing survivorship data. Ecology 59: 175–179.
  • Ridgway, R. L., S. L. Jones, 1968. Field – cage releases of Chrysopa carnea for supression of population of bollworm and the tobocco budworm on cotton. J. Econ. Entomol., 61 (4): 892-897.
  • Sattar, M. (2010). Investigations on Chrysoperla (Stephens) carnea
  • Chrysopidae) as a biological control agent against cotton pests in Pakistan. Sindh Agriculture University, Tando jam. PhD. Thesis, 193 p.
  • (Neuroptera: Sattar, M., Hamed, M., Nadeem, S., 2007. Predatory potential of Chrysoperla carnea Sstephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) against cotton mealy bug. Pak. Entomol. Vol. 29, No.2, 103- 106.
  • Stark, S. B., F. Whitford, 1987. Functional response of Chrysopa
  • Chrysopidae) larvae feeding on Heliothis virescens (Lep.: Noctuidae) eggs on cotton in field cages. Entomophaga, 12 (5): 521-527.
  • Anila Nisar Syed, Muhammad Ashfaq and Sherbaz Khan, 2005. Comparison of development and predation
  • (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on different densities of two hosts (Bemisia tabaci and Amrasca devastans). Pak. Entomol. Vol. 27, No.1, 41-44.
  • carnea Tauber, M. J., C. A. Tauber, K. M. Daane and K. S. Hagen,
  • predators: recent lessons from green lacewings
  • Chrysopidae:Chrysoperla). Am. Entomol. 46: 26–38.
  • of (Neuroptera: Yoldaş , Z., 1994. İ ki farklı avla beslenen Chrysoperla carnea
  • Chrysopidae)’nın biyolojisi üzerinde araş tı rmalar. Türkiye III. Biyolojik Mücadele Kongresi Bildirileri , 25-28 ocak, İ zmir, Türkiye Entomoloji Derneğ i yayı nları No: 7, 375-380. (Neuroptera:
Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-3647
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Mevlüt AKÇURA
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluating Yield And Yield Components Of Pure Lines Selected From Bread Wheat Landraces Comparatively Along With Registered Wheat Cultivars In Canakkale Ecological Conditions

Onur HOCAOĞLU, Mevlüt AKÇURA

Current Situation of Almond Cultivation in Turkey and World

Ümran Eldoğan Ahmet Şahan And Nergi ÇOBAN

Different Interstock Lengths Effects on ‘Star Ruby’ Grapefruit and ‘Kütdiken’ Lemon for Some Plant Nutrient Elements

Bilge YILMAZ, Turgut YEŞILOĞLU, Meral İNCESU, Berken ÇIMEN, Müge KAMILOĞLU

The Efficacy of Aminoethoxyvinylglycine (ReTain) For Improving Fruit Set on ‘0900 Ziraat’ Sweet Cherry

Erdal AĞLAR, Lynn E. LONG, Burhan ÖZTÜRK, Onur SARAÇOĞLU, Kenan YILDIZ, Medeni KARAKAYA

INSPIRE Directives assessment of multiple geospatial information for vegetable production

Vera STEFANOVA, Zhulieta ARNAUDOVA, Dimka HAYTOVA, Tatyana BILEVA

Seed Germination, Growth and Morphological Parameters of Betonica bulgarica Deg. et Neic. Cultivated under Different Conditions

Galia PANAYOTOVA, Neli GROZEVA, Dimitar PAVLOV, Mima TODOROVA, Marya GERDZHIKOVA

Rural Tourism in the Republika Srpska: Political Framework and Institutional Environment

Sinisa BERJAN, Hamid El BILALI, Gordana RADOVIC, Borko SORAJIC, Noureddin DRIOUECH, Adriana RADOSAVAC

Xanthomonas gardneri – Characterization and Resistance of Bulgarian Tomato Varieties

Kamelia ALEKSANDROVA, Daniela GANEVA, Nevena BOGATZEVSKA

Advances of Green Roofs for Environment in Urban Areas

Serpil ÖNDER

Local monitoring program for invasion of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the Dam lake Zhrebchevo, Bulgaria

Stefka STOYANOVA, Galin NİKOLOV, Katya VELİCHKOVA, Alexander ATANASOFF, Sevdegul MUMUN