Different Interstock Lengths Effects on ‘Star Ruby’ Grapefruit and ‘Kütdiken’ Lemon for Some Plant Nutrient Elements

Bu çalışma farklı çeşit ve ara anaç uzunluklarının Kütdiken limon (KL) ve Star Ruby (SR) altıntopunun yaprak besin içeriği üzerine etkilerini belirlemek için yürütülmüştür. Faklı uzunluklardaki SR (5, 10, 20 ve 40 cm) Kütdiken limonu için ara anaç olarak ve benzer uzunluklardaki Minneola tanjelo (MT)’da SR için ara anaç olarak kullanıldı. Her iki çeşit için de Turunç (SO) anaç olarak kullanıldı. SO üzerine aşılı KL ve SR çeşitleri kontrol uygulaması olmuştur. Yaprak besin elementi konsantrasyonu [Fosfor (P), potasyum (K), kalsiyum (Ca), magnezyum (Mg), mangan (Mn), demir (Fe), çinko (Zn), bakır (Cu)] 2010 yılı sezonunda belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar farklı ara anaç uzunluğunun microelement içeriği üzerine belirgin bir etkiye sahip olmadığı ancak, KL’nun yapraklarında Mn içeriği üzerine önemli etkilerinin olduğunu göstermiştir. En yüksek Mn içeriği KL/SR-20 cm/SO; en düşük ise KL/SR-10 cm/SO kombinasyonunda bulunmuştur. Star Ruby altıntopunda ara anaç uzunluğu arasındaki farklılıklar P ve Ca için önemli bulunmuştur. En yüksek P içeriği SR/SO (kontrol), SR/MT-10 cm/SO ve SR/MT-40 cm/SO ağaçlarında saptanmıştır. Ca içeriği de en yüksek olarak SR/SO (kontrol), SR/MT-20 cm/SO, SR/MT-40 cm/SO ve SR/MT-5 cm/SO kombinasyonlarında belirlenmiştir. En yüksek K içeriğini KL/SO (kontrol) ağaçlarında bulunmuş ve bunu KL/SR-10 cm/SO kombinasyonu izlerken , en düşük K içeriği ise KL/SR-5 cm/SO’nın yapraklarında saptanmıştır

Different Interstock Lengths Effects on ‘Star Ruby’ Grapefruit and ‘Kütdiken’ Lemon for Some Plant Nutrient Elements

This study was conducted to determine the effects of different varieties and the lengths of interstock on leaf nutrient concentrations of Kütdiken lemon (KL) and Star Ruby grapefruit (SR). SR with different lengths (5, 10, 20 and 40 cm) was used as interstock for KL and Minneola tanjelo (MT) with same lengths was used as interstock for SR. Sour orange (SO) was used as rootstock for both species. KL and SR scions grafted on SO were used as control treatments. Leaf nutrient element concentrations [phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu)] were determined in season 2010. The results indicated that the different lengths of interstock had no obvious effects on the contents of microelement but had noted significant effects in the contents of Mn in KL leaves. (Mn) was the highest on KL/SR-20 cm/SO and the lowest on KL/SR-10 cm/SO. Differences among interstock length were important for P and Ca content of Star Ruby and the highest P content were found SR/SO (control), SR/MT-10 cm/SO and SR/MT-40 cm/SO trees. The content of Ca was determined as the highest in the leaves of SR/SO (control), SR/MT-20 cm/SO, SR/MT-40 cm/SO and SR/MT-5 cm/SO. The KL/SO (control) trees have given the highest K content followed by KL/SR-10 cm/SO, whereas the lowest K content was obtained in the leaves of KL/SR-5 cm/SO

___

  • Bevington, K.B. and Cullis, B.R., 1990. Evaluation of rootstocks for Marsh and Davis grapefruit in the Murray Region of New South Wales. Australian Agriculture 30(3): 405-411. Experimental
  • FAO 2014. Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org. Database.
  • Davies FS, Albrigo LG (1994). Citrus. Crop Protection Science in Horticulture, No: 2, CAB International, Redwood Books, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK. p. 254.
  • Ferguson, L. and Chao, C. T. 2000. Performance of ‘Okitsu Wasi’ and ‘Dobashi Beni’ satsuma mandarins on eight different rootstocks in California’s Central Valley. Proc. Int. Soc. Citricult. 133:125-129.
  • Georgiou, A. and Gregoriou, C. 1999. Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Shamouti’ orange on fourteen rootstocks in Cyprus. Sci. Hortic. 80:113-121.
  • Incesu, M., Çimen B., Yesiloglu T. and Yilmaz B., 2013. Rootstock effects on yield, fruit quality, rind and juice color of Moro blood orange. Journal of food, Agriculture & Environment. Vol. 11 (3&4): 867-871.
  • Jimenez R, Frometa E, Garcia E (1987). Effects of six rootstocks on quality of frost Eureka. Cienc. Tec. Agric. Citricos y Otros Frutales, 10(1): 73-81.
  • Lawrence FP, Bridges D (1974). Rootstocks for Citrus in Florida. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Ins. of Food and agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, p. 13.
  • McCollum, T.G., Bowman, K.D., and castle, W.S., 2002. Effects of rootstock on fruit quality and postharvest behavior of Marsh grapefruit. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 115:44-46.
  • Ochoa, F., Mendt, R., Quintero, D., Sanchez, P., Gomez, K. and Romero, G. 1998. Evaluation of Citrus Tristeza Virus tolerant Rootstocks budded with Washington Navel Orange. http://www.ivia.es/iocv/archivos/Proceedin gsX/10th113_115.pdf.Accessed:25.06.2013. pp. 113-115.
  • Ramin, A.A., and Alirezanezhad, A., 2005. Effects of citrus rootstocks on fruit yield and quality of Ruby Red and Marsh grapefruit. Fruits, Vol.60 : 311-317.
  • Shafieizargar, A., Awang, Y., Jurimi, A. and Othman, R. 2012. Yield and fruit quality of ‘Queen’ orange grafted on different rootstocks in Iran. AJCS 6:777-783.
  • Stover E., Pelosi, R., Burton, M., Cliento, S., and Ritenour, M., 2004. Performance of yolları ve yapılması gereken
  • Yildirim, B., Yeşiloğlu, T., Uysal-Kamiloğlu, M., İncesu, M., Tuzcu, Ö. and Çimen, B. 2010. Fruit yield and quality of Santa Teresa lemon on seven rootstocks in Adana (Turkey). African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(10):1077-1081.
Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-3647
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Mevlüt AKÇURA
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Results and Perspectives of Breeding by Resistance to Loose Smut in Barley

Toshka POPOVA

Influence of Treatment with Post-Emergence Herbicides on Productivity of Barley Emon, Lardeya and Orfey

Dina ATANASOVA, Vasilina MANEVA

Evaluation of Antalya Province With Regards to Soil and Water Resources

Harun KAMAN, Murat YAVAŞ

Multi-criteria evaluation for sustainable horticulture

Vera STEFANOVA, Zhulieta ARNAUDOVA, Dimka HAYTOVA, Tatyana BILEVA

Evaluation of Morphological Manifestations of New Bulgarian Kohlrabi Variety Grown in The Conditions of Organic Crop Production

Galina ANTONOVA, Stefan NEYKOV, Lilia KRASTEVA, Petar CHAVDAROV

Effect of Calcium and Boron on the Ion Status, Carbohydrate and Proline Content, Gas Exchange Parameters and Growth Performance of Pomegranate cv. Wonderful Plants Grown Under NaCl Stress

Eleana SARAFI, Christos CHATZISSAVVIDIS, Ioannis THERIOS

Xanthomonas gardneri – Characterization and Resistance of Bulgarian Tomato Varieties

Kamelia ALEKSANDROVA, Daniela GANEVA, Nevena BOGATZEVSKA

Breeding assessment of several economic and biological traits in winter two-row barley

Milka Dimitrova – DONEVA, Borjana DYILGEROVA, Darina VALCHEVA, Dragomir VALCHEV, Toschka POPOVA, Margarita GOCHEVA

Seed Germination, Growth and Morphological Parameters of Betonica bulgarica Deg. et Neic. Cultivated under Different Conditions

Galia PANAYOTOVA, Neli GROZEVA, Dimitar PAVLOV, Mima TODOROVA, Marya GERDZHIKOVA

Management of Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Greenhouse Cucumbers Using Microbial Products

Vinelina YANKOVA, Dima MARKOVA, Mladen NAIDENOV, Boyan ARNAOUDOV