Integration of SWOT Analysis with Remote Sensing Method as a Sustainable Planning and Management tool for Protected Areas

Protected areas are one the most important nature conservation landscapes and during the last few decades, the importance of natural areas have been considered as a priority for lifestyle preferences of people around the world. Karatepe Aslantaş National Park is one of the examples for these protected areas in Turkey, however; there have been limited studies focusing on the preservation and development of a socioeconomic plan for the aforementioned national park. Therefore, this study aims to develop planning and management priorities of Karatepe Aslantaş National Park and determine tourism potential towards future-oriented conservation. In this regard, a SWOT analysis was performed to develop sustainable planning and design proposals. To determine the historical transformation of a protected area and its surroundings, Land use/land cover-change (LUCC) detection was performed using Landsat 7 ETM and Landsat TIRS/OLI satellites images of the study area for the years 1990 and 2018. The results showed that in 1990, the mixed forest class dominated the study area (2376.6 ha), likewise, it was the most effective land cover class in 2018 (2178.14 ha). Agricultural land with natural vegetation class occupied the second largest area for both 1990 and 2018 with 1264.72 ha and 880.13 ha, respectively. A marked decrease was found for the transitional woodland/shrubs cover (565.8 ha in 1990 to 330.35 ha in 2018). Among the all land use classes, the highest percentage of change was found for broad-leaved forest cover at 200% between 1990 and 2018, while the lowest percentage of change occurred to water bodies with 8.82% in the same time frame. Regarding the findings, management proposals have been developed to conserve the protected area considering its tourism potential and archeological heritage values. Therefore, it is recommended that the lack of planning and management strategies needs to be fulfilled as a legal commitment by government agencies.

PDF

___

Atasoy M. 2018. Monitoring the urban green spaces and landscape fragmentation using remote sensing: a case study in Osmaniye, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(12): 713. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-7109-1

Atasoy M. 2019. Assessing the impacts of land-use/land-cover change on the development of urban heat island effects. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00535-w.

Baz I, Geymen A, Er SN. 2009. Development and application of GIS-based analysis/synthesis modeling techniques for urban planning of Istanbul Metropolitan Area. Advances in Engineering Software, 40(2): 128-140.

Cengiz T. 2007. Tourism, an ecological approach in protected areas: Karagöl-Sahara National Park, Turkey. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(3): 260-267.

CLC. 2019. Copernicus Land Monitoring Service. Available from: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-landcover [Accessed: 10.12.2019].

Çeşmeci N, Tekeli EK. 2018. Göreme Tarihi Milli Parkı'nın sürdürülebilir turizm açısından değerlendirilmesi. TURAN Center for Strategic Researches, 10(40): 148.

Demir S, Esbah H, Akgün AA. 2016. Quantitative SWOT analysis for prioritizing ecotourism-planning decisions in protected areas: Igneada case. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 23(5): 456-468.

DKMP. 2019. General Directorate of Natural Conservation and National Parks. Available from: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr /DKMP/Sayfalar/EN/AnaSayfa.aspx [Accessed:15.12.2019].

Doğanay S, Alım M, Altaş NT. 2009. A Sample for the environmental protection implementation in Turkey: National Parks. 1st International Symposium on Sustainable Development, Sarajevo, June 9-10, International Burch University, 223-230.

Eker Ö, Demircioğlu H. 2016. An application of travel-cost method and willingness to pay surveys for Karatepe Aslantaş National Park in Turkey. 1st International Mediterranean Science and Engineering Congress, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey, October 26-28, Çukurova University, 1316- 1321.

Güngör S, Arslan M. 2004. Turizm ve rekreasyon stratejileri için SWOT analizi, görsel kalite değerlendirmesi, turizm tesislerinin beğenilirliği ve turizm tesisleri durum analizi uygulaması; Beysehir İlçesi örneği. SÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(33):68-72.

Hayes TM. 2006. Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development, 34(12): 2064-2075.

Kintz DB, Young KR, Crews-Meyer KA. 2006. Implications of land use/land cover change in the buffer zone of a national park in the tropical Andes. Environmental Management, 38(2): 238-252.

Le Saout S, Hoffmann M, Shi Y, Hughes A, Bernard C, Brooks TM, Bertzky B, Butchart SH, Stuart SN, Badman T, Rodrigues AS. 2013. Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science, 342(6160): 803-805.

Lewis E, MacSharry B, Juffe‐Bignoli D, Harris N, Burrows G, Kingston N, Burgess ND. 2019. Dynamics in the global protected‐area estate since 2004. Conservation Biology, 33(3): 570-579.

Naughton-Treves L, Holland MB, Brandon K. 2005. The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30: 219-252.

Nordh H, Østby K, 2013. Pocket parks for people–A study of park design and use. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(1): 12- 17.

Rezazadeh S, Jahani A, Makhdoum M, Meigooni HG. 2017. Evaluation of the strategic factors of the management of protected areas using SWOT Analysis-Case study: Bashgol Protected Area-Qazvin Province. Open Journal of Ecology, 7(1): 55-68.

Scolozzi R, Schirpke U, Morri E, D'Amato D, Santolini R. 2014. Ecosystem services-based SWOT analysis of protected areas for conservation strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 146: 543-551.

WDPA. 2019. World Database on Protected Areas, Protected Planet Live Report 2020. UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and NGS: Cambridge UK; Gland, Switzerland; and Washington, D.C., USA, ISBN: 978-92-807-3721-9.