Effects of Using Hazelnut Husk, Wood Shaving and of the Mixture at Different Thicknesses on Broiler Performances, Some Organ Weights, Foot-Pad Dermatitis and Litter Traits

This study was carried out to determine the effects of the use of hazelnut husk (HH), wood shavings (WS) and the mixture of 50% hazelnut husk + 50% wood shavings (MIX) in two different thicknesses (4 and 8 cm) as a litter material in broiler production. The experiment was carried out as a factorial experimental design (3 litter type and 2 thickness) and stocking density was 10 chickens per m2. At 6 wk. of age, the effect of litter types and thicknesses on broiler live weights, feed efficiency, and livability, were not significant. Also, no differences were found in terms of gizzard, digestive tract, abdominal fat and edible internal organ weight percentages. While carcass yield varied between litter groups, there was no difference between litter thicknesses. The litter moisture levels at the end of the trial were not affected the litter type and litter thickness, while the foot pad dermatitis (FPD) rates were significantly affected. The highest FPD levels were determined in the HH litter and 4 cm thickness. As a result, the use of HH, WS and MIX of them with a thickness of 4 and 8 cm had no effect on other traits except for FPD levels. It has been observed that these litter materials may be used successfully in broiler production and use of 8 cm thickness litter has minor positive effects except that the cost of litter has doubled.

PDF

___

Chakma S, Miah MY, Ara A, Kawsar MH. 2012. Feasibility of using fallen tea leaves as litter in broiler rearing. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 41(1): 52-54. doi: 10.3329/bjas.v41i1.11978.
Cohuo-Colli JM, Salinaz-Ruiz J, Hernandez-Cazares AS, Hidalgo-Contreras JV, Brito-Damian VH, Velasco-Velasco J. 2018. Effect of litter density and foot health program on ammonia emissions in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 27: 198-205. doi: 10.3382/japr/pfx058.
Ekstrand C, Algers B, Svenberg J. 1997. Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 31: 167-174. doi: 10.1016/S0167- 5877(96)01145-2.
El-Deek AA, Al-Harthi MA, Khalifah MM, Elbanoby MM, Alharby T. 2011. Impact of newspaper as bedding material in arid land on broiler performance. Egyptian Poultry Science, 31(4): 715-725.
Garces APJT, Afonso SMS, Chilundo A, Jairoce CTS. 2017. Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 49: 369-374. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1202-7.
Lima RC, Freitas ER, Gomes HM, Cruz CEB, Fernandes DE. 2018. Performance of broiler chickens reared at two stocking densities and coir litter with different height. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, 49(3): 1-14. doi: 10.5935/1806-6690. 20180059.
Mayne RK. 2005. A review of the aetiology and possible causative factors of foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys and broilers. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 61: 256-267. doi: 10.1079/WPS200458.
Moesta A, Knierum U, Briese A, Hartung J. 2008. The effect of litter condition and depth on suitability of wood shavings for dust bathing behavior. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 115: 160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.005.
Monira KN, Islam MA, Alam MJ, Wahid MA. 2003. Effect of litter materials on broiler performance and evaluation of manureal value of used litter in late autumn. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences, 16: 555-557. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2003.555.
Munir MT, Belloncle C, Irle M, Federighi M. 2019. Wood based litter in poultry production: A review. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 75: 1-12. doi: 10.1017 /S0043933918000909.
Musa WI, Sa’idu L, Kaltungo BY, Abubakar UB, Wakawa AM. 2012. Poultry litter selection, management and utilization in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 6: 44-55. doi: 10.3923/ajpsaj.2012.44.55.
Nowaczewski S, Rosisnski A, Markiewicz M, Kontecka H. 2011. Performance foot-pad dermatitis and haemoglobin saturation in broiler chickens kept on different types of litter. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 75: 132-139.
Ramadan SGA, Mahboub HDH, Helal MA, Gaafar KM. 2013. Behaviour, welfare and performance of broiler chicks reared on different litter materials. Assiust Veterinary Medical Journal, 59: 9-18.
Sarica M, Cam MA. 1998. The effect of reused litter materials on broiler performances and litter properties. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 22: 213-219.
Sarica M, Cam MA. 2000. Potential of hazelnut husks as a broiler litter material. British Poultry Science, 41: 541-543. doi: 10.1080/713654977.
Sarica M, Cam MA, Karacay N. 1996. Fındık zurufunun etlik piliç üretiminde altlık materyali olarak değerlendirilmesi. Fındık ve Diğer Kabuklu Meyveler Sempozyumu. Bildiriler 226-234, 10-11 Ocak, Samsun.
Sarica M, Selcuk E. 1993. Yerde yetiştirilen bıldırcınların çeşitli verim özellikleri üzerine değişik altlık materyallerinin etkileri. Turkish Veterinary and Animal Science, 17: 133-138.
Shao D, He J, Lu J, Wang Q, Chang L, Shi SR, Bing TH. 2015. Effect of sawdust thickness on growth performance, environmental condition, and welfare quality of yellow broilers. Poultry Science, 94: 1-6. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu003.
Shepherd EM, Fairchild BD, Ritz CW. 2017. Alternative bedding materials and litter depth impact litter moisture and foot pad dermatitis. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 26: 518- 528. doi: 10.3382/japr/pfx024.
Sogunle OM, Ogunjimi BA, Fanimo AO. 2006. Effect of litter depth on performance of three strains of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 5: 1155-1157. doi: 10.5958/2277-940X.2017.00102.4.
Tercic D, Zolger M, Pestotnik M. 2014. Effect of different litter materials on foot pad dermatitis, hocking born and feather coverage in broiler chickens. Acta Agriculturae Slovenice, 106(2): 97-101.
Toledo TDSD, Pich CS, Roll AAP, Dai Pra MA, Leivas Leite F, Gonçalves Xavier E, Roll VFB. 2019. The effect of litter materials on broiler performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Poultry Science, 60(6): 605-616. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2019.1639143.
Willis WL, Murray C, Talbott C. 1997. Evaluation of leaves as a litter material. Poultry Science, 76: 1138-1140. doi: 10.1093/ps/76.8.1138.
Yamak US, Sarica M, Boz MA, Ucar A. 2016. Effect of reusing litter on broiler performance, foot-pad dermatitis and litter quality in chickens with different growth rates. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1): 85-91. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2015.13957.
Zikic D, Djukic-Stojcic M, Bjedov S, Peric L, Stojanovic S, Uscebrka G. 2017. Effect of litter development and severity of foot-pad dermatitis and behaviour of broiler chickens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 19(2): 247-254. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0396