SEVGİ ÇALIŞKAN, RAMAZAN İLHAN AYTEKİN, Ayten Kübra YAĞIZ, CANER YAVUZ

Bazı Fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Çeşitlerinde Tam ve Kısıtlı Sulama Uygulamalarının Tane Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi

Bu çalışma, tam ve kısıtlı sulamanın farklı fasulye çeşitlerinden elde edilen tohumların yaş ve kuru tohum ağırlığı, su alma kapasitesi, su alma indeksi, kuru ve ıslak hacim, şişme kapasitesi, şişme indeksi, protein oranı ve pişme süresi gibi kalite özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri ve Teknolojileri Fakültesi Laboratuvarında yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada sekiz farklı fasulye çeşidi (Yunus 90, Cihan, Göynük 98, Batalla, Alberto, Arslan, Zirve, Noyanbey 98) kullanılmıştır. Deneme, tesadüf bloklarında bölünmüş parseller deneme desenine göre 3 tekrarlamalı olarak kurulmuştur. Çalışma sonucunda, incelenen tüm özellikler bakımından uygulamalar ve çeşitler arasında istatistiksel anlamda farklılıklar meydana gelmiştir. Kısıtlı sulama uygulamasından elde edilen tohumlar, incelenen tüm özellikler bakımından daha düşük değerler vermiştir. Kuru ve yaş ağırlık, su alma kapasitesi ve indeksi, şişme kapasitesi ve indeksi, kuru ve yaş hacim, pişme süresi ve protein oranı üzerine çeşitlerin istatistiki etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmamızda pişme süresinin tane iriliği ile ilişkili olduğu; iri taneli çeşitlerde pişme süresinin arttığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca çalışmada, generatif dönemde ortaya çıkabilecek su kısıntısının kuru fasulyede tohum kalitesini olumsuz etkilediği, bu dönemde topraktaki yarayışlı su kapasitesinin %50’nin altına düşürülmemesi gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Effect of Full and Limited Irrigation Treatments on Seed Quality of Some Common Bean Cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

The aim of the study is to determine the seed quality of different dry bean genotypes, grown under full and limited irrigation conditions. The study was conducted at Nigde Omer Halisdemir University laboratories. Eight different dry bean cultivars (Yunus 90, Cihan, Goynuk 98, Batalla, Alberto, Arslan, Zirve, Noyanbey 98) were used in the study. The study was established with 3 replications according to randomized split-plot design. Quality characters like dry and wet seed weight, water uptake capacity, water uptake index, dry and wet volume, swelling capacity and swelling index, cooking time and protein content were determined. In conclusion, statistically significant differences among applications and cultivars were observed in terms of the all parameters examined. The grains obtained from the limited irrigation plots, had lower values in terms of all evaluated properties. Differences between dry and wet weight, water uptake capacity and index, dry and wet volume, cooking time and protein content between cultivars were statistically significant. In the study, correlation between cooking time and grain size was determined, and it was concluded that enlarging in grains size increases the cooking time. In addition, it was concluded that limited irrigation in the reproductive period had a negative effect on seed quality of different dry bean cultivars and it should not be lowered below 50% of the water capacity in the soil during this period.

PDF

___

Anonim 2018a. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul
Anonim 2018b. Tohumluk Tescil Sertifikasyon Merkezi Müdürlüğü, Tarımsal Değerleri Ölçme Denemeleri Teknik Talimatı. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/ Belgeler
Al-Shaibani NA. 2009. Influence of Early Water Deficit on Seed Yield and Quality of Faba Bean under Arid Environment of Saudi Arabia. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 5(5):649-654.
Amir Y, Haenni A, Youyou A. 2007. Physical and biochemical differences in the composition of the seeds of Algerian leguminous crops. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 20(6): 466-471.
Ashraf M, Iram A. 2005. Drought stress induced changes in some organic substances in nodules and other plant parts of two potential legumes differing in salt tolerance. Flora, 200:535-546.
Anton AA, Ross KA, Beta T, Fulcher RG, Arntfıeld SD. 2008. Effect of pre-dehulling treatments on some nutritional and physical properties of navy and pinto beans (Phaselus vulgaris L.). Food Science and Technology, 41(5): 771- 778.
Bozoğlu H, Sözen Ö. 2007. Some Agronomic Properties of the Local Population of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Artvin Province, Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 31 (5): 327-334.
Barros M, Prudencio SH. 2016. Physical and chemical characteristics of common bean. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 37(2):751-762.
Bhatty RS. 1984. Relationship Between Physical and Chemical Characters and Cooking Quality in Lentil. Journal of Agric. and Food Chem., 32(5): 1161-1166.
Bishnoi S, Khetarpaul N. 1993. Variability in physico-chemical properties and nutrient composition of different pea cultivars. Food Chemistry, 47,:371-373.
Costa EGA, Monıcı KSQ, Reıs SMPM, Olıveıra AC. 2006. Chemical composition, dietary fiber and resistant starch contents of raw and cooked pea, common bean, chickpea and lentil legumes. Food Chemistry, 94(3): 327-330.
Çulha G, Bozoğlu H. 2017. Amazon ve Sırma Börülce Çeşitlerinin Tane Kalitesine Farklı Kültürel Uygulamaların Etkisi. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 20 (Özel Sayı):362- 366.
Dornbos DL. Jr. Mullen RE, Shibles RM. 1989. Drought stress effects during seed fill on soybean seed germination and vigor. Crop Sci. 29:476–480.
Egli DB, TeKrony DM, Heitholt JJ, Rupe J. 2005. Air temperature During Seed Filling and Soybean Seed Germination and Vigor. Crop Science, 45:1329-1335.
Ercan R, Atlı A, Köksel H, Dağ A. 1994. Cooking Quality and Composition of Dry Beans Grown in Turkey. GIDA, 19(5):313-316.
Fageria NK, Melo LC, Ferreira EPB, Oliveira JP, Knupp AM. 2014. Dry Matter, Grain Yield, and Yield Components of Dry Bean as Influenced by Nitrogen Fertilization and Rhizobia. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 45:111–125.
Ferreira CD, Ziegler V, Paraginski RT, Vanier NL, Elias MC, Oliveira M. 2017. Physicochemical, antioxidant and cooking quality properties of long-term stored black beans: effects of moisture content and storage temperature. International Food Research Journal, 24(6): 2490-2499.
Fresneau C, Ghashghaie J, Cornic G. 2007. Drought effect on nitrate reductase and sucrose-phosphate synthase activities in wheat (Triticum durum L.): role of leaf internal CO2. Journal Experimental Botany, Advance Access:1-10.
Gathu WE, Njage PMK. 2012. Physical characterization of new advanced drought tolerant common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) lines for canning quality. American Journal of Food Technology, 7(2): 22-28.
Ghanbari AA, Shakiba MR, Toorchi M, Choukan R. 2013a. Nitrogen changes in the leaves and accumulation of some minerals in the seeds of red, white and chitti beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) under water deficit conditions. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 7: 706–712.
Ghanbari AA, Mousavi SH, Mousapour Gorjı A, Rao I. 2013b. Effects of Water Stress on Leaves and Seeds of Bean. Turkish Journal of Fıeld Crops, 18(1):73-77.
Golezani GK, Oskooyi MR. 2012. Effect of water supply on seed quality development in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris var.). International Journal of Plant Production, 2(2): 117-124.
Graham PH, Ranallı P. 1997. Common bean. Field Crops Research, 53(1-3): 131-146.
Gubbels GH, Khan SH. 1991. Effect of seed quality on cooking quality and yield of subseque. crop of field pea. Can J. Plant Sci., 71: 857-859.
Kınacı G, Akın R, Kınacı E. 2008. Farklı Sulama Rejimlerinin Kuru Fasulyenin (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Fiziksel Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri. C.B.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2): 179-186.
Heatherly LG. 1993. Drought stress and irrigation effects on germination of harvested soybean seed. Crop Sci., 33: 777–781.
Montoya CA, Leterme P, Vıctorıa NF, Toro O, Souffrant WB, Beebe S, Lalles JP. 2008. Susceptibility of phaseolin to in vitro proteolysis is highly variable across common bean varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris). Journal Agricultural of Food Chemistry, 56(6): 2183-2191.
Muller FM. 1967. Cooking quality of pulses. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture, 18: 292–295.
Nunez Barrios A, Hoogenboom G, Nesmith DS. 2005. Drought stress and distribution of vegetative and reproductive traits of a bean cultivar. Sci. Agric. Piracicaba, Braz., 62: 18-22.
Nciri N, El Mhamdi F, Ismail HB, Mansour AB, Fennira F. 2015. Physical Properties of Three White Bean Varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Grown in Tunisia. Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture, 9(11): 195-200.
Rezene Y, Gebeyehu S. Zelleke H. 2011. Genetic variation for drought resistance in small red seeded common bean genotypes. Afr. Crop. Sci. J. 19: 303-312.
Rharrabti Y, Villegas D, Garcia Del Moral LF, Aparicio N, Elhani S, Royo C. 2001 Environmental and genetic determination of protein content and grain yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Plant Breed., 120: 381–388.
SAS. 1996. SAS Institute Inc., SAS/STAT Software: Chances and Enhancements Through Release 6.11. SAS Inst. Inc., Carry, NC, USA.
Saha S, Singh G, Mahajan V, Gupta HS. 2009. Variability of nutritional and cooking quality in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as a function of genotype. Plant Foods Human Nutr., 64: 174–180.
Saucedo CMC, Córdova-Téllez L, González-Hernández VA, Delgado-Alvarado A, Santacruz-Varela A, García-de los Santos G. 2009. Physiological performance, yield, and quality of dry bean seeds under drought stress. Interciencia, 34(10).
Sefa-Dedah S, Stanley DW. 1979. Textural implications of the microstructure of legumes. Food Technology, 33: 77–83.
Shımelıs EA, Rakshıt SK. 2005. Proximate composition and physico-chemical properties of improved dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L,) varieties grown in Ethiopia. Journal of Food Science, 38(4): 331-338.
Singh SP. 1995. Selection for water-stress tolerance in interracial populations of common bean. Crop Science, 35: 118–124.
Singh SP. 2007. Drought resistance in the race Durango dry bean landraces and cultivars. Agron. J., 99: 1219–1225.
Smicklas KD, Mullen RE, Carlson RE, and Knapp AD. 1992. Soybean seed quality response to drought stress and pod position. Agron. J., 84:166–170.
Szilagyi L. 2003. Influence of Drought on Seed Yield Components in Common Bean. Bulgarian Journal Plant Physiology, Special Issue, 320-330.
Sozen Ö, Karadavut U, Akççura M. 2017. Determination of the Some Yield Components of Dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes in Different Environments. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, 3 (5): 3755-3769.
Şehirali S, Atlı A. 1993. Fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)’ de Pisme Özellikleri. Tekirdag Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 161, Arastırmalar: 59.
Wang N, Hatcher DW, Tyler RT, Toews R, Gawalko EJ. 2010. Effect of cooking on the composition of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Food Research International, 43: 589-594.
Wani I.A, Sogi DS, Wani AA, Gill BS. 2017. Physical and cooking characteristics of some Indian kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Journal of Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 16: 7-15.
Williams PC, Nakoul H, Singh KB. 1987. Relationship between cooking time and physical characteristics in chickpea. J. Sci. Food Agric., 34: 492–497.