A Study on the Changes of Colostrum Quality, Milk Constituents and Somatic Cell Count after Calving in Holstein Friesian Cows

A Study on the Changes of Colostrum Quality, Milk Constituents and Somatic Cell Count after Calving in Holstein Friesian Cows

Colostrum quality produced by dairy cows varies considerably. The amount of immune protein content in colostrum has also high specific gravity. In this study, the specific gravity of colostrum (SGC) produced by 32 Holstein-Friesian cows with different parities in the first five milking after calving, and additionally, the fat content (FC), non-fat dry matter content (NFDMC) and somatic cell count (SCC) in the milk samples taken in the first five milking and on the fifth and 10th day milking of lactation were determined. The effects of parity and milking order on SGC, FC, NFDMC and Log10SCC were detected to be statistically significant. Parity x milking order interaction effect was found to be significant for SGC, FC and NFDMC, but its effect on Log10SCC was insignificant. Cows with three and upper parities had higher SGC, FC, NFDMC, and Log10SCC than cows in the first and second parities. While SGC (1055.09±1.20 mg/mL), FC (6.36±0.12%) and NFDMC (18.17±0.37%) obtained at the first milking decreased gradually in advancing milking, Log10SCC (5.90±0.028) level increased. The correlation coefficients of SGC with FC, NFDMC, and Log10SCC were low-medium, the coefficients between FC and NFDMC were moderately too high in the first three milking, and decreased and approached zero in advancing milking. It was observed that SGC remained high even in the fourth milking in some cows, especially in the third and higher parities. In conclusion, it has been revealed that not only colostrum obtained from the first milking, but also quality colostrum produced in subsequent milking can be used in calf feeding in dairy cattle farms. However, all this depends on the adoption of the strategy of determining the quality of colostrum with the help of a colostrometer in dairy cattle farms.

___

  • Ali AKA, Shook GE. 1980. Optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. J. Dairy Sci., 63: 487-490.
  • Barlowska J, Litwinczuk Z, Wolanciuk A, Brodziak A. 2009. Relationship of somatic cell count to daily yield and technological usefulness of milk from different breeds of cows. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 12(1): 75-79.
  • Bartier AL, Windeyer MC, Doepel L. 2015. Evaluation of on- farm tools for colostrum quality measurement. J Dairy Sci., 98:1878–84.
  • Blood DC, Studdert VP, Gay CC. 2007. Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary, Third edition. Elsevier limited. Chase CCL, Hurley DJ, Reber AJ. 2008. Neonatal immune development in the calf and its impact on vaccine Response. Vet Clin Food Anim, 24: 87–104.
  • Deluyker HA, Gay JM, Weaver LD. 1993. Interrelationships of somatic cell count, mastitis and milk yield in a low somatic cell count herd. J. Dairy Sci., 76: 3445-3452.
  • Doğan Z, Koç A. 2014. Effects of different weaning age and housing system on the growth performances of Holstein- Friesian calves. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences Special Issue, 2:1646-1653.
  • Drikic M, Windeyer C, Olsen S, Fu Y, Doepel L, De Buck J. 2018. Determining the IgG concentrations in bovine colostrum and calf sera with a novel enzymatic assay. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 9:69.
  • EAS, 164. 2006. Determination of Fat Content (Routine method). Second Edition 2006. https://law.resource.org/pub/eac/ibr/ eas.164.2006.pdf (accessed 20 may 2020).
  • Forsbäck L. 2010. Bovine Udder Quarter Milk in Relation to Somatic Cell Count, Focus on Milk Composition and Processing Properties. PhD Thesis (Unpublished), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Uppsala.
  • Geiger AJ. 2020. Colostrum: back to basics with immunoglobulins. Journal of Animal Science, 98: 126–132, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa142.
  • Hopkins FM, Dean DF, Greene W. 1984. Failure of passive transfer in calves: Comparison of field diagnosis methods. Modern Veterinary Practice, 65(8): 625-628.
  • Hoyraz M, Sezer R, Demirtaş M, Koç A. 2014. Determination of colostrum quality and constituents of Holstein-Friesian cows. X. National Animal Science Student Congress. 23-26 April, Kayseri, TURKEY.
  • Hurley WL. 2013. Lactation Biology. http://classes.ansci.uiuc. edu/ansc438/Milkcompsynth/ milkcompsynthresources.html (R.T.: 15.09.2013).
  • Karslı MA, Evci Ş. 2018. The ımportance of cattle and calf nutrition in preventing calf losses. Lalahan Hay. Araşt. Enst. Derg., 58 (Special Issue): 23-34.
  • Koç A. 2008. A study of somatic cell counts in the milk of Holstein-Friesian cows managed in Mediterranean climatic conditions. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 32(1): 13-18.
  • Koç A. 2015. Effects of somatic cell count and various environmental factors on milk yield and foremilk constituents of Red-Holstein cows. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21: 439-447
  • McGuirk SM, Collins M. 2004. Managing the production, storage, and delivery of colostrum. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract., 20:593–603.
  • Moran J. 2005. Calf Rearing. A Practical Guide. Second Edition. Landlinks Press, 150 Oxford Street (PO Box 1139) Collingwood, Viv, 3066, Australia.
  • Morin DE, McCoy GC, Hurley WL. 1997. Effects of quality, quantity and timing of colostrum feeding and addition of a dried colostrum supplement on immunoglobulin G1 absorption in Holstein bull calves. J. Dairy. Sci., 80:747-753.
  • Nikodémusz E, Bedö S, Pickler A, Szép P. 1994. Variations in milk somatic cell count and haematologic values of dairy cows during lactation. Acta Vet. Hung., 42: 131-139.
  • IDF, 1995. International Dairy Federation. Enumeration of Somatic Cells. FIL-IDF Standard no. 148A IDF, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Okuyucu IC, Erdem H. 2016. Non-genetic factors affecting colostrum quality and effects of barning type and colostrum quality on growth performance of Holstein calves. Academia Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(4): 47-60.
  • Phipps AJ, Beggs DS, Murray AJ, Mansell PD, Pyman MF. 2017. Factors associated with colostrum immunoglobulin G concentration in Northern-Victorian dairy cows. Australian Veterinary Journal, 95:7
  • Robison JD, Stott GH, DeNise SK. 1988. Effects of passive ımmunity on growth and survival in the dairy heifer. J Dairy Sci., 71:1283-1287
  • Santos JEP, Cerri RLA, Ballou MA, Higginbotham GE, Kirk JH. 2004. Effect of timing of first clinical mastitis occurrence on lactation and reproductive performance of Holstein dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 2004: 80: 31-45.
  • Schombee WS. 2011. Survey of Colostrum Quality and Management Practices on Commercial Dairy Farms in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Master of Science. University of South Africa.
  • Sederevičius A, Balsytė J, Lukauskas K, Kazlauskaitė J, Biziulevičius GA. 2006. An enzymatic cow immunity- targeted approach to reducing milk somatic cell count: 3. A comparative field trial. Food and Agricultural Immunology, 17: 2006 - Issue 1.
  • Stelwagen K, Carpenter E, Haigh B, Hodgkinson A, Wheeler TT. 2009. Immune components of bovine colostrum and milk. J. Anim. Sci., 87:3-9.
  • Uetake K. 2013. Newborn calf welfare: A review focusing on mortality rates. Animal Science Journal, 84:101–105. doi: 10.1111/asj.12019.
  • Yaylak E, Güley Z, Sayan Y, Kulay T. 2018. The colostrum quality and composition of Simmental and Brown Swiss heifers. Biosci. J., Uberlândia, 34(2): 368-377
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The Effect of Different Salinity Levels on Germination Development of Some Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Varieties

Mehmet Zeki Koçak, Orhan Kurt, Merve Göre

The Effect of Hatching System and Egg Weight on Hatching Traits in Turkish Geese: Hatch time, Hatchability and Gosling Quality Traits

Mehmet Akif Boz, Musa Sarıca, Kadir Erensoy, Ahmet Uçar

Alkali Extraction of Dietary Fiber from Trigonella-foenum graecum L. Seeds (Dietary Fiber of Fenugreek Seeds)

İzzet Türker, Hilal İşleroğlu, Sedanur Daştan

Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Litsea floribunda Gamble, Leaf and Bark Extract

Karthik Madhayan, Sunder Suganya, Venkadachalam Balamurugan

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Its Pathogenicity

Nida Nur Urgancı, Gamze Koçer Alaşalvar, Zeliha Yıldırım, Nazife Yılmaz

Invasion of Fall armyworm [Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)] (JE Smith ,1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidanead) Management Strategies in Maize Fields of Nepal

Dolma Diki Sherpa, Neha Sah, Ishan Gautam, Shobha Pokhrel, Gautam Bahadur Khadka, Sachindra Dev Upadhyaya, Rashmi Khanal

Analysis of Clade V MLO Gene Expressions in Hazelnut Leaves during Exposure to Powdery Mildew

Ulku Baykal, Kadriye Özcan

Antimicrobial Activity of Garlic (Allium Sativum L.) in The Preservation of Merguez, A Traditional Algerian Sausage

Abed Hanane, Rouag Noureddine, Nasri Meriem

The Effect of Roasting on Volatile Compounds of Ground Coffee and Turkish Coffee Brew

Ceyda Dadalı

Adoption-Diffusion Model of Farm Innovations: Its Applicability to Radical Terraces Project in Rwanda

Emmanuel Murwanashyaka, Preston Orieko Chitere, James Gichuru Kariuki