Ufuk ALPKAYA, Oya ERKUT ATILGAN, Manolya AKIN, Salih PINAR

Relation between balance loss in floor exercises by male gymnasts and anthropometric features and balance

Bu çalışmanın amacı 17. Uluslararası Boğaziçi artistik cimnastik şampiyonasına katılan erkek cimnastikçilerin yer serisi denge kayıplarıyla laboratuvar ortamındaki denge test sonuçları ve bazı antropometrik özelliklerin ilişkisini incelenmiştir. Bu araştırmaya 15 erkek gönüllü cimnastikci katılmıştır (yaş= 19.93±2,98, antrenman yaşı 12,87±3,68). Yer serisindeki denge kayıplarının analizi için, seriler videoya çekilmiş ve videolar tekrar seyredilerek her cimnastik hareketindeki denge kaybı değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca statik – dinamik denge, vücut ağırlığı, boy, kulaç, bacak ve gövde uzunlukları ölçülmüştür. Verilerin analizinde Pearson Korelasyon katsayısı kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, yer serisindeki denge kayıplarıyla static – dinamik denge test sonuçları arasında istatistiksel bir ilişki bulunmamıştır (p>0,05). Antrenman yaşı, boy, kilo, kulaç, gövde ve bacak uzunluklarıyla yer hareketleri denge kaybı arasında da bir ilişki bulunmamıştır (p>0.05). Ancak dinamik denge test sonucuyla kilo arasında (r=-0,565; p

This study aims at looking into the relationship between losses of balance in floor exercises performed by male gymnasts at 17th International Bosporus Gymnastics Tournament and some of the anthropomorphic characteristics and the balance tests given under laboratory conditions. 15 male gymnasts volunteered for this research, (aged= 19.93 ± 2.98, training years12.87±3.68). In order to analyze the losses of balance in floor exercises, the floor routines were recorded by video, and each loss of balance following each gymnastic element was evaluated. Also static – dynamic balance, body weight, height, arm span, leg and torso lengths were measured. Pearson Correlation coefficient was used for analyzing the relations between the data findings. It was found that there was no statistical relation between the losses of balance in floor exercises and static-dynamic balance test results (p>0.05). Also no correlation was found between floor exercise losses of balance and number of training years, height, body weight, arm span, torso length, and leg length (p>0.05). But it was observed that there was a negative correlation between dynamic balance test and body weight (r=-0.565 p<0.05) and between static balance with closed eyes and age (r=0.582 (p<0.05). A reasonable explanation for these results are that keeping one's balance after the element in artistic gymnastics is more likely to be a result of the technical mastery.

Keywords:

Artistic gymnastics; balance; balance loss; anthropomorphic characteristics.,

PDF

___

1. Asseman F, Caron O, Cremieux J. Is there a transfer of postural ability from specific to unspecific postures in elite gymnastics? Neuroscience Letters, 2004; 358, 83-86.
2. Boswell B. Comparison of two methods of improving dynamic balance of mentally retarded children. Percept Mot Skills 1991, 73: 759-764.
3. Brüggemann GP. Biomechanics of gymnastics techniques. Sport Sci Rev, 1994; 3(2): 79-120.
4. Crawfort SM. Anthropometry, Measurement in Pediatric Exercise Science. (Ed. Docherty, D), Human Kinetics, Champaign USA. 1996; 17-46.
5. Davlin C D. Dynamic balance in high level athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2004; 98(3): 1171-1176.
6. Federation International Gymnastic. FIG Judges Specific Rules for Mens Artistic Gymnastics. FIG. Retrieved December, 2012; 28-76.
7. Franks IM. The effects of experience on detection and location of performance differences in a gymnastics technique. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1993; 64(2): 277-231.
8. Gabbard C. Lifelong Motor Development. Wm C. Brown Pub.1st Ed, USA, 1992: 21-45.
9. Golomer E, Dupui P, Monad H. Sex-linked differences in equilibrium reactions among adolescents performing complex Sensory-motor Tasks. J Physiol, 1997; 91(2): 49-55.
10. Halilaj B, Vehapi S. Relationship between explosive and repetitive strength and different gymnastics elements. Sportekspert, 2009; 2(2): 69-73.
11. Jemni M, Sands, WA, Friemel F, Stone MH, Cooke CB. Any effect of gymnastics training on upper body and lower body aerobic and international male gymnastics. J Strength Cond Ass, 2006; 20(4): 899-907.
12. Johnson RE, Kirkendall DR., Gruber JJ. Measurement and Evaluation for PE. USA: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1987; 65-98.
13. Kruczkowski D. Investigation of balance in trials specific to artistic gymnastics. Medsportpress, 2007; (13): 1, 95-99.
14. Lohman TG, Roche A.F, Martorell, R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Human Kinetics Illinois. 1998; 3-55.
15. Mac Nitt-Gray J, Racquejo P, CostaK, Mathiyakomo W. Landing success rate during the artistic gymnastics competition of the 2000 Olympic Games: Implication for improved gymnastics/Mat interaction (www.coachesinfo.com), 2009.
16. Marinsek M. Landing characteristics in mens floor exercise on European championships 2004. Science of Gymnastics, 2006; 1(1): 31-39.
17. Marinsek M. Basic landing characteristics and their application in artistic gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics, 2011; 2(2): 59-67.
18. Nakamura T, Kato S, Watanabe Y A. Case study on the forward handspring of beginning gymnasts. In Bulletin of Health and sports sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1999; 22(1): 33-42.
19. Paillard T, Noe F, Riviere T, Marion V, Montoya R, Philippe, D. Postural performance and strategy in the unipedal stance of soccer players at different levels of competition. J. Athl Train, 2006; 41(2): 172-176.
20. Polishchuc T, Mosakowska M. The balance and jumping ability of artistic gymnastics competitors of different ages. Medsportpress, 2007; 1(13): 100-103,.
21. Robertson S, Elliott D. Specificity of learning and dynamic balance. Res Q Exerc Sport, 1996; 67(1): 69- 75.
22. Suchilin NG, Arkaev, LI. Gymnastics-How to create championships. 1st Ed. Meyer& Meyer Sport Uk. Ltd. 2004: 55-81.
23. Vandorpe B, Vandendriessche J, Vaeyens R, Pion J, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R. Lenoir Factors discriminating gymnasts by competitive level. Int. J. Sport Med, 2011; 32: 591-597,
24. Vuillerme N, Nougier V. Attentional demand for regulating postural sway: the effects of expertise in gymnastics. Brain Research Bulletin, 2004; 63: 161- 165.
25. Vuillerme N, Teasdale N, Nougier V. The effect of expertise in gymnastics. Neuroscience Letters, 2001; 311(2), 83-86.
26. Yoshiaki T, Dunn JH, Blucker E. Techniques used in high-scoring and low scoring vault performed by elite male gymnasts. Sport Biomechanics, 2003; 2(2): 141-162.
27. Zivcic KM, Omrcen D. The analysis of the influence of teaching methods on the Acquisition of the landing phase in forward handspring. Science of Gymnastics, 2010; 1(1): 21-30.